Economia e Politica Industriale

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 323–330 | Cite as

Innovation policies: the national and regional dimensions

  • Philippe LaredoEmail author


The article discusses the article by Lucchese, Nascia and Pianta (this volume). It does so from the standpoint of innovation policy mixes. We highlight four main points. First most discussions on innovation policies underestimate the central role played by public investment banks (with their tools to support firm innovation). Second we have witnessed a massive move from sectoral policies to procedural policies and indirect, criteria based policy instruments (such as tax credits or support to investments in machinery) no longer focused on industries as such but on firm innovation capacity. Third higher education constitutes probably the most important framework condition supporting innovation and this raises important questions on the overall funding of universities and on their role in vocational training. Fourth I argue that the more procedural policies become, the greater the need for place-based policies, discussing thus the importance of regional innovation policies and the role of ‘clusters’, a missing dimension in the overview of Italian policies provided by Lucchese, Nascia and Pianta.


Innovation policy Regional policy Italy 

JEL Classification

E6 L5 O4 


  1. Edquist, C. (2011). Design of innovation policy through diagnostic analysis: Identification of systemic problems (or failures). Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(6), 1725–1753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., & Laranja, M. (2011). Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), 702–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Georghiou, L., Edler, J., Uyarra, E., & Yeow, J. (2014). Policy instruments for public procurement of innovation: Choice, design and assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 86, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Henriques, L. (2006). The dynamics of a national system of innovation and the role of the non-profit space: Portugal as a Research Laboratory. Paris: École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris.Google Scholar
  5. Kohler, C., Larédo, P., & Rammer, C. (2012). Fiscal incentives for business R&D, NESTA-MIOIR Compendium of evidence on the effectiveness of innovation policy intervention, p 36.
  6. Lhuillery, S., Marino, M., & Parrotta, P. (2013). Evaluation de l’impact des aides directes et indirectes à la R&D en France. Rapport pour le Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche, Paris, p 50 + annexes.Google Scholar
  7. OECD. (2014). Examen des politiques d’innovation de la France, Paris, OECD, p 294.Google Scholar
  8. Piganiol, P., Herz, K., Major, R., Ramsey, N. F., Schmidt, E. I., Schultz, T. W., & Steacie, E. W. R. (1963). Science and the policies of governments, the implications of science and technology for national and international affairs. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université Paris Est (Ecole des Ponts, IFRIS)ParisFrance
  2. 2.University of Manchester (MBS, MIOIR)ManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations