Mapping seabed sediments for Sharm Obhur using multibeam echosounder backscatter data
- 35 Downloads
The observed hydrographic surveying data from multibeam echosounder system (MBES) contains sounding and backscatter intensity data that can be utilized in many coastal and marine applications such as marine geological and environmental investigations. In this paper, the seabed sediments mapping for Sharm Obhur (Obhur Creek) was derived using backscatter intensity data. The backscatter data were radiometrically and geometrically corrected to produce a seabed backscatter mosaic for Sharm Obhur study area. Then, the angular response analysis was implemented to derive the seabed sediment’s grain size, classification (gravel, sand and mud) and associated confidence level values that identify the quality of the classification method implemented in this paper. It was shown that the mouth in the south of the Sharm Obhur mainly contains sand sediments, however, the north side of the Sharm Obhur contains mud sediments and gravel sediments can be seen in very small areas. Moreover, it was found that the successful rate of classification is 90% based on the estimated confidence values. To validate the derived seabed sedimentation map, a comparison was made between the grab sampling results reported in the literature and the seabed sediments types derived in this paper. The comparison showed that the derived seabed sediments results using angular response model agree with the grab sampling results. The advantage of mapping the seabed sedimentation using multibeam backscatter data over the grab sampling method is that it can provide the seabed sediment mapping for the entire area using the MBES due to its 100% coverage of the seabed.
KeywordsMBES Sharm Obhur Backscatter mosaic Angular response Sedimentation GEOCODER
This work was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The author, therefore, acknowledges with thanks DSR technical and financial support. In addition, many thanks to Abdullah Shaheen and Abdullah Alamoudy for their help in this manuscript.
- APL (1994) High-frequency ocean environmental acoustic models handbook (APL-UW TR 9407). Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
- APL (2000) High-frequency bistatic scattering model for elastic seafloors. Applied Physics Laboratory University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
- CARIS (2017) Training manual: backscatter imagery data processing CARIS HIPS and SIPS professional 10.4. Teledyne CARIS, Inc., Fredericton, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- Dufek T (2012) Backscatter analysis of multibeam sonar data in the area of the Valdivia Fracture Zone using GEOCODER in CARIS HIPS&SIPS and IVS3D Fledermaus. Master Thesis, Hafen City Universität HamburgGoogle Scholar
- Gheith A, Hariri M (2010) Assessment of marine ecosystem degradation based on studying the geological significances of bottom sediments in Sharm Obhur, North Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. JKAU: Mar Sci 21(2):89–108Google Scholar
- Hughes Clarke JE, Danforth BW, Valentine P (1997) Areal seabed classification using backscatter angular response at 95 kHz. In: NATO SACLANTCEN Conference Proceedings Series CP-45, high frequency acoustics in shallow water: pp 243–250Google Scholar
- Lurton X, Lamarche G (eds) (2015) Backscatter measurements by seafloor-mapping sonars. Guidelines and recommendations. vol Geohab Report. http://geohab.org/publications/. Accessed 30 Sep 2019