Advertisement

Modeling Earth Systems and Environment

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 1007–1019 | Cite as

Groundwater flow modelling of a micro-watershed in the upland area of East Godavari district, Andhra Pradesh, India

  • Yellapu Siva Prasad
  • Yellamelli Ramji Satyaji Rao
Original Article
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

In view of the progressive decline of groundwater levels in the majority of non-command upland area in the East Godavari district, Andhra Pradesh state, India, there is an urgency to augment groundwater in the non-command upland areas. Groundwater flow model is constructed for a micro-watershed of 50 km2 namely ‘Konda Kalava watershed’ of ‘Suddegedda river basin’ located in the non-command upland area of East Godavari district. The steady state groundwater flow model simulated to seven observation wells and calibrated for the month of April, 2018. The objective of the model is to assess input and output stresses and to identify the over-stressed areas within the basin. The water budget analysis has revealed that the total groundwater extraction by pumping wells is 83.3% and evapotranspiration loss is 5.7% of the total groundwater recharge in the basin. The groundwater flow following the topography and is towards the mainstream with a maximum velocity of 0.4 m/day. The results revealed that the southern part of the basin is experiencing huge aquifer stress due to over-dependence on deep bore wells. It is recommended that, for at least one season, the most affected dry areas which are under paddy cultivation are to be promoted irrigated dry crops such as maize and jowar. It is also suggested that, due to local high salinity in and around Vannepudi village at the central part of the basin, the horticulture cultivation is to be promoted by increasing the surface water resources. The artificial recharge structures have to be constructed at suitable areas in and around Vannepudi village in order to improve the groundwater quality in terms of high salinity and also to rise the groundwater table in the southern part of the basin.

Keywords

Groundwater Suddegedda Recharge Salinity  Khondalite 

References

  1. Ahmed I, Umar R (2009) Groundwater flow modelling of Yamuna–Krishni inter stream, a part of central Ganga Plain Uttar Pradesh. J Earth Syst Sci 118(5):507–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhaskara Rao G (2013) Groundwater brochure: East Godavari district, Andhra Pradesh. Central Ground Water Board Report, Government of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  3. CGWB (2015) Status of groundwater level scenario during pre-monsoon season-2015 (May), Andhra Pradesh, Central Ground Water Board Report, Government of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  4. CGWB (2016) Groundwater year book, Andhra Pradesh (2015–16), Central Ground Water Board Report, Government of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  5. Dinesh Kumar M, Sivamohan MVK, Niranjan V, Nitin B (2011) Groundwater management in Andhra Pradesh: time to address real issues, Institute for Resource Analysis and Policy ReportGoogle Scholar
  6. NIH (1993) Representative basin studies in Suddagedda basin network design and installation of equipment, National Institute of Hydrology report, Government of India, CS (AR)-146Google Scholar
  7. NIH (2000) Representative basin studies: hydrogological and geochemical studies of groundwater flow in Suddagedda basin, National Institute of Hydrology report, Government of India, CS/AR-26/1999-2000Google Scholar
  8. GEC (1997) A report on ground water resource estimation methodology-1997. Ministry of Water Resources, Government of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  9. GWD (2002) Estimation of groundwater resources in Andhra Pradesh, Ground Water Department Report. Govt. of Andhra Pradesh, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  10. Jackson JM (2007) Hydrogeology and groundwater flow model, Central catchment of Bribie Island, southeast Queensland. Dissertation, Queensland University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  11. Khadri SFR, Pande C (2016) Ground water flow modeling for calibrating steady state using MODFLOW software: a case study of Mahesh River basin, India, Model. Earth Syst Environ 2:39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Konikow LF, Bredehoeft JD (1974) Modeling flow and chemical quality changes in an irrigated stream-aquifer system. Water Resources Res 10(3):546–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kumar S, Choudhary MK, Nayak TR (2017) Groundwater modelling in Bina River basin, India using visual modflow. Int J Sci Res Dev 5(5):1398–1402Google Scholar
  14. Lachaal F, Gana S (2016) Groundwater flow modeling for impact assessment of port dredging works on coastal hydrogeology in the area of Al Wakrah (Qatar), model. Earth Syst Environ 2:201Google Scholar
  15. Mayer A, May W, Lukkarila C, Diehl J (2007) Estimation of fault zone conductance by calibration of a regional groundwater flow model: Desert Hot Springs, California. Hydrol J 15(6):1093–1106Google Scholar
  16. Mondal NC, Singh VP, Sankaran S (2011) Groundwater flow model for a tannery belt in southern India. J Water Resource Prot 3:85–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sathish S, Elango L (2015) Numerical simulation and prediction of groundwater flow in a coastal aquifer of southern India. J Water Resource Prot 7:1483–1494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Satyaji Rao YR, Vijaya Kumar SV, Seethapathi PV, Rao UVN, Rao SVN (1997) Estimation of infiltration rates in the Suddagedda basin, East Godavari district. Andhra Pradesh, National Institute of Hydrology Report, Government of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  19. Siva Prasad Y, Venkateswara Rao B (2018) Groundwater depletion and groundwater balance studies of Kandivalasa River Sub Basin, Vizianagaram District, Andhra Pradesh, India. Groundwater for Sustain Dev 6:71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Surinaidu L, Rao VVSG, Rao NS, Srinu S (2014) Hydrogeological and groundwater modeling studies to estimate the ground water inflows into the coal Mines at different mine development stages using MODFLOW, Andhra Pradesh, India. Water Resources Ind 7–8:49–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Takounjou FA, Rao VVSG, Ngoupayou NJ, Nkamdjou SL, Ekodeck GE (2009) Groundwater flow modelling in the upper Anga’a river watershed, Yaounde, Cameroon. Afr J Environ Sci Technol 3(10):341–352Google Scholar
  22. Thornthwaite CW (1948) An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geol Rev 38:55–94Google Scholar
  23. Varni MR, Usunoff EJ (1999) Simulation of regional scale groundwater flow in the Azul River basin, Buenos Aires province, Argentina. J Hydrogeol 7(2):180–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vijaya Kumar SV, Ramasastri KS, Vijay T (1994) Representative basin studies in Suddagedda basin: network design and installation of equipment. National Institute of Hydrology report, Government of IndiaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yellapu Siva Prasad
    • 1
  • Yellamelli Ramji Satyaji Rao
    • 1
  1. 1.Deltaic Regional CentreNational Institute of HydrologyKakinadaIndia

Personalised recommendations