Adult Attachment and Long-term Mate Preferences in Iran
Attachment research has investigated the ways in which individual differences in attachment influence relationship outcomes. Research on individual differences in attachment and mating preferences is lacking in non-Western cultures. The current study examined the relationships between attachment dimensions and long-term mate preferences in Iran. A sample of adults (N = 255; 54% women) completed measures of attachment and long-term mate preferences. Anxious attachment was positively correlated with women’s preferences for Education/Intelligence and Religiosity/Chastity, and positively associated with men’s preferences for Kindness/Dependability, Status/Resources, and Religiosity/Chastity in choosing a long-term mate. Avoidant attachment style was not related to long-term mate preferences in either sexes. Findings are discussed in the light of evolutionary perspectives on attachment and human mate preferences. Limitations and future directions are discussed.
KeywordsAttachment Mate preferences Romantic relationships Evolutionary psychology Iran
We thank Mohammad Atari for his assistance and thoughtful feedback in this study. We are grateful to Farzan Karimi-Malekabadi for his helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.
- Afshari, Z., Mootabi, F., & Panaghi, L. (2015). The mediating role of early maladaptive schemas in relation between attachment styles and marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 2, 59–70.Google Scholar
- Apostolou, M., Paphiti, C., Neza, E., Damianou, M., & Georgiadou, P. (2019). Mating performance: exploring emotional intelligence, the dark triad, jealousy and attachment effects. Journal of Relationships Research, 10.Google Scholar
- Atari, M., Chaudhary, N., & Al-Shawaf, L. (in press). Mate preferences in three Muslim-majority countries: sex differences and personality correlates. Social Psychological and Personality Science. Google Scholar
- Besharat, M. A. (2013). Adult Attachment Inventory: questionnaire, instruction and scoring key (Persian version). Developmental Psychology: Iranian Psychologists, 9, 318–321.Google Scholar
- Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1: Attachment. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2: Separation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3: Loss, sadness & depression. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Conroy-Beam, D., Goetz, C. D., & Buss, D. M. (2015). Why do humans form long-term mateships? An evolutionary game-theoretic model. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 51, pp. 1–39). Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Edelstein, R. S., & Shaver, P. R. (2004). Avoidant attachment: exploration of an oxymoron. Handbook of closeness and intimacy, 39, 7–412.Google Scholar
- Simpson, J. A., & Rholes, S. W. (2015). Attachment theory and research: New directions and emerging themes. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar