Advertisement

Evolutionary Psychological Science

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 416–425 | Cite as

The Price of Singlehood: Assessing the Impact of Involuntary Singlehood on Emotions and Life Satisfaction

  • Menelaos ApostolouEmail author
  • Ioanna Matogian
  • Georgia Koskeridou
  • Marios Shialos
  • Polixeni Georgiadou
Original Article

Abstract

A considerable proportion of people living in Western societies are single, i.e., they do not have an intimate partner. Recent research has indicated that about half of these instances are involuntary—people want to be in a relationship, but face difficulties in attracting partners. Within the context of an evolutionary theoretical framework, the current study aims to estimate the occurrence of involuntary singlehood in the Greek cultural context and to assess its impact on emotional wellbeing and on life satisfaction. Using an online sample of 735 Greek-speaking participants (431 women and 304 men), it was found that nearly 40% of those who were single were involuntarily so. It was also found that involuntary singles experienced significantly more negative emotions and lower life satisfaction than voluntary singles and people in a relationship.

Keywords

Singlehood Involuntary singlehood Emotions Life satisfaction Mating 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Apostolou, M. (2007). Sexual selection under parental choice: the role of parents in the evolution of human mating. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 403–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apostolou, M. (2010). Sexual selection under parental choice in agropastoral societies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apostolou, M. (2012). Sexual selection under parental choice: evidence from sixteen historical societies. Evolutionary Psychology, 10, 504–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Apostolou, M. (2015). Past, present and why people struggle to establish and maintain intimate relationships. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 9, 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Apostolou, M. (2016). Feeling good: An evolutionary perspective on life choices. New York: Rutledge.Google Scholar
  6. Apostolou, M. (2017a). Individual mate choice in an arranged marriage context: evidence from the standard cross-cultural sample. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 3, 193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Apostolou, M. (2017b). Why people stay single: an evolutionary perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 111, 263–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Apostolou, M. (2019). Why men stay single? Evidence from Reddit. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5, 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Apostolou, M., Papadopoulou, I., & Georgiadou, P. (2018). Are people single by choice: involuntary singlehood in an evolutionary perspective. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences. Advance Online Publication.Google Scholar
  10. Apostolou, M., Shialos, M., & Georgiadou, P. (2019). The emotional cost of poor mating performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 138, 188–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beckmeyer, J. J., & Cromwell, S. (2018). Romantic relationship status and emerging adult well-being. Emerging Adulthood. Advance Online Publication.Google Scholar
  12. Bowles, S. (2009). Did warfare among ancestral hunter-gatherers affect the evolution of human social behaviors? Science, 324, 1293–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Broude, G., & Greene, S. J. (1976). Cross-cultural codes on twenty sexual attitudes and practices. Ethnology, 15, 409–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buss, D. M. (2017). The evolution of desire: strategies of human mating (4th ed.). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Coontz, S. (2006). Marriage, a history: how love conquered marriage. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  16. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Figueredo, A. J., Sefcek, J. A., & Jones, D. N. (2006). The ideal romantic partner personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 431–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fordyce, M. W. (1988). A review of research on the happiness measures: a sixty second index of happiness and mental health. Social Indicators Research, 20, 355–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haselton, M., Buss, D. M., Oubaid, V., & Angleitner, A. (2005). Sex, lies, and strategic interference: The psychology of deception between the sexes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li, N. P., van Vugt, M., & Colarelli, S. M. (2017). The evolutionary mismatch hypothesis: implications for psychological science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 38–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the depression anxiety & stress scales (2nd ed.). Sydney: Psychology Foundation.Google Scholar
  22. Maner, J., & Kenrick, D. T. (2010). When adaptations go awry: functional and dysfunctional aspects of social anxiety. Social Issues and Policy Review, 4, 111–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pew Research Center. (2006). Internet & American life project, online dating survey 2005. Retrieved from: http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media/Files/Reports/2006/PIP_Online_Dating.pdf.pdf.
  24. Pew Research Center. (2013). Online dating & relationships. Retrieved from: http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media/Files/Reports/2013/PIP_Online%20Dating%202013.pdf.
  25. Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  26. Puts, D. A. (2016). Human sexual selection. Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 28–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosenfeld, M. J., Reuben, J. T., & Falcon, M. (2015). How couples meet and stay together, waves 1, 2, and 3: public version 3.04, plus wave 4 supplement version 1.02 and wave 5 supplement version 1.0 [Computer files]. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Libraries.Google Scholar
  28. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1988). The evolution of war and its cognitive foundations. Institute for Evolutionary Studies Technical Report, 88, 1–15.Google Scholar
  29. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2008). The evolutionary psychology of the emotions and their relationship to internal regulatory variables. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Johnes, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 114–137). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  30. Walker, R. S., Hill, K. R., Flinn, M. V., & Ellsworth, R. M. (2011). Evolutionary history of hunter-gatherer marriage practices. PLoS One, 6, e19066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1999). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule-expanded form. Iowa: the University of Iowa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of NicosiaNicosiaCyprus

Personalised recommendations