Experimentally Inducing Disgust Reduces Desire for Short-Term Mating
Short-term mating strategies involve casual sex, multiple partners, and short-time intervals before initiating intercourse. Such strategies should be difficult to implement in the presence of high levels of sexual disgust. Researchers have therefore suggested—and found evidence for—the hypothesis that individuals with a stronger proclivity for short-term mating have lower levels of sexual disgust. Here, we suggest a related hypothesis: inducing sexual disgust should reduce desire for short-term mating. Experiment 1 (N = 341) and experiment 2 (N = 361) investigated the effects of disgust induction on desire for short-term mating. Both studies found that inducing disgust reduces desire for short-term mating, and that the effect of sexual disgust is particularly strong. These results support the novel hypothesis advanced here and corroborate the broader hypothesis that reduced sexual disgust is a previously undiscovered design feature of short-term mating strategies.
KeywordsDisgust Emotions Evolutionary psychology Sexual disgust Mating Short-term mating
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- Al-Shawaf, L., & Lewis, D. M. (2013). Exposed intestines and contaminated cooks: Sex, stress, & satiation predict disgust sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(6), 698–702.Google Scholar
- Al-Shawaf, L., Conroy-Beam, D., Asao, K., & Buss, D. M. (2015a). Human emotions: An evolutionary psychological perspective. Emotion Review, 8, 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914565518.
- Al-Shawaf, L., Lewis, D. M., & Buss, D. M. (2018). Sex differences in disgust: Why are women more easily disgusted than men? Emotion Review, 10(2), 149–160.Google Scholar
- Buss, D. M. (2015). Evolutionary psychology: the new science of the mind, 5th Edition. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Curtis, V., De Barra, M., & Aunger, R. (2011). Disgust as an adaptive system for disease avoidance behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 366(1563), 389–401.Google Scholar
- de Jong, P. J., van Lankveld, J., Elgersma, H. J., & Borg, C. (2010). Disgust and sexual problems–Theoretical conceptualization and case illustrations. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 3(1), 23–39.Google Scholar
- de Jong, P. J., van Overveld, M., & Borg, C. (2013). Giving in to arousal or staying stuck in disgust? Disgust-based mechanisms in sex and sexual dysfunction. Journal of Sex Research, 50(3–4), 247–262.Google Scholar
- McIntyre, M., Gangestad, S. W., Gray, P. B., Chapman, J. F., Burnham, T. C., O'Rourke, M. T., & Thornhill, R. (2006). Romantic involvement often reduces men’s testosterone levels–but not always: the moderating role of extrapair sexual interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 642–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention (2011). 10 ways STDs impact women differently from men. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
- O’Shea, K.J., DeBruine, L.M., & Jones, B.C. (in press). Further evidence for associations between short-term mating strategy and sexual disgust. Personality and Individual Differences.Google Scholar
- Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., & Griskevicius, V. (2009). Microbes, mating, and morality: Individual differences in three functional domains of disgust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 103–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015474.Google Scholar