Advertisement

Evolutionary Psychological Science

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 98–103 | Cite as

Are People Single by Choice? Involuntary Singlehood in an Evolutionary Perspective

  • Menelaos ApostolouEmail author
  • Irene Papadopoulou
  • Polyxeni Georgiadou
Research Article

Abstract

A substantial proportion of people living in Western societies do not have an intimate partner. The current research attempts to estimate the occurrence of people who are involuntary single—they want to be in an intimate relationship but they find it difficult to do so—in the Greek cultural context. Evidence from two independent studies (N = 1682) indicated that about half of the participants who were single, they were involuntary so. It was also found that, mating performance—how well people do in starting and keeping an intimate relationship—was a significant predictor of involuntary singlehood, with low scorers facing a higher probability to be involuntary single than high scorers.

Keywords

Involuntary singlehood Singlehood Mating Mating performance Mate choice 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Georgia Kapitsaki and one anonymous reviewer for their constructive feedback which enabled the improvement of this work.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Apostolou, M. (2014). Sexual selection under parental choice: the evolution of human mating behaviour. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  2. Apostolou, M. (2015). Past, present and why people struggle to establish and maintain intimate relationships. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 9, 257–269.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-018-0163-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apostolou, M. (2016). Feeling good: an evolutionary perspective on life choices. New York: Rutledge.Google Scholar
  4. Apostolou, M. (2017). Why people stay single: an evolutionary perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 111, 263–271.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Apostolou, M. (2018). Why men stay single? Evidence from Reddit. Evolutionary Psychological Science. Advance Online Publication, 122, 19–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.004.Google Scholar
  6. Apostolou, M., Shialos, M., Kyrou, E., Demetriou, A., & Papamichael, A. (2018). The challenge of starting and keeping a relationship: prevalence rates and predictors of poor mating performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 19–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Broude, G. J., & Green, S. J. (1983). Cross-cultural codes on husband-wife relationships. Ethnology, 22, 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buss, D. M. (2017). The evolution of desire: strategies of human mating (4th ed.). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Coontz, S. (2006). Marriage, a history: how love conquered marriage. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  10. Crawford, C. (1998). Environments and adaptations: then and now. In C. Crawford & D. L. Krebs (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 275–302). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Gallup, (2015). Fewer young people say I do to any relationship. Retrieved from: http://news.gallup.com/poll/183515/fewer-young-people-say-relationship.aspx
  12. Pew Research Center (2006). Internet & American life project, Online Dating Survey 2005. Retrieved from: http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media/Files/Reports/2006/PIP_Online_Dating.pdf.pdf
  13. Pew Research Center (2013). Online Dating & Relationships. Retrieved from: http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media/Files/Reports/2013/PIP_Online%20Dating%202013.pdf
  14. Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Puts, D. A. (2016). Human sexual selection. Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 28–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rosenfeld, M. J., Reuben, J. T. & Falcon, M. (2015). How couples meet and stay together, waves 1, 2, and 3: public version 3.04, plus wave 4 supplement version 1.02 and wave 5 supplement version 1.0 [computer files]. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Libraries.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of NicosiaNicosiaCyprus

Personalised recommendations