Evolutionary Psychological Science

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 87–97 | Cite as

Why Men Stay Single? Evidence from Reddit

  • Menelaos ApostolouEmail author
Research Article


In Western societies, a substantial proportion of the adult population does not have an intimate partner. The current paper puts forward an evolutionary theoretical framework, where people stay single for three main reasons, namely the mismatch between ancestral and modern conditions has resulted in several individuals lacking the adaptations necessary for attracting and retaining mates, individuals can increase their fitness by opting out of relationships, and individuals have constraints that prevent them from attracting a mate. The paper attempted to identify the reasons that drive men to be single and to investigate whether they were consistent with the proposed theoretical framework. More specifically, 13,429 responses from a recent Reddit thread were analyzed, and 6794 responses were coded and classified in 43 categories. Among the most frequent reasons that men indicated for being single included poor flirting skills, low self-confidence, poor looks, shyness, low effort, and bad experience from previous relationships.


Singlehood Mismatch problem Mate choice Mating performance Mating 



The author would like to thank Georgia Kapitsaki and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback which enabled the improvement of this work.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.


  1. Apostolou, M. (2007). Sexual selection under parental choice: The role of parents in the evolution of human mating. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 403–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apostolou, M. (2008). Parent-offspring conflict over mating: The case of beauty. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 303–315.Google Scholar
  3. Apostolou, M. (2010). Sexual selection under parental choice in agropastoral societies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Apostolou, M. (2012). Sexual selection under parental choice: evidence from sixteen historical societies. Evolutionary Psychology, 10, 504–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Apostolou, M. (2014). Sexual selection under parental choice: the evolution of human mating behaviour. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  6. Apostolou, M. (2015a). Past, present and why people struggle to establish and maintain intimate relationships. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 9, 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Apostolou, M. (2015b). Sexual dysfunctions in men: an evolutionary perspective. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 1, 220–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Apostolou, M. (2016a). An evolutionary account of the prevalence of personality traits that impair intimate relationships. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 140–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Apostolou, M. (2016b). Feeling good: an evolutionary perspective on life choices. New York: Rutledge.Google Scholar
  10. Apostolou, M. (2016c). Size did not matter: an evolutionary account of the variation in penis size and size anxiety. Cogent Psychology, 3, 1147933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Apostolou, M. (2017). Why people stay single: an evolutionary perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 111, 263–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bowles, S. (2009). Did warfare among ancestral hunter-gatherers affect the evolution of human social behaviors? Science, 324, 1293–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Breslin, P. A. S. (2013). An evolutionary perspective on food and human taste. Current Biology, 23, R409–R418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Broude, G. J., & Green, S. J. (1983). Cross-cultural codes on husband-wife relationships. Ethnology, 22, 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buss, D. M. (2017). The evolution of desire: strategies of human mating (4th ed.). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Coontz, S. (2006). Marriage, a history: how love conquered marriage. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  17. Crawford, C. (1998). Environments and adaptations: Then and now. In C. Crawford & D. L. Krebs (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 275–302). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. DePaulo, B. M. (2017). What no one ever told you about people who are single. TEDx Talk. Retrieved from:
  19. DePaulo, B. M., & Morris, W. L. (2005). Singles in society and in science. Psychological Inquiry, 16, 57–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fales, M. R., Frederick, D. A., Garcia, J. R., Gildersleeve, K. A., Haselton, M. G., & Fisher, H. E. (2016). Mating markets and bargaining hands: mate preferences for attractiveness and resources in two national U.S. studies. Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 78–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Flinn, M. V. (1988). Daughter guarding in a Trinidadian village. In L. Betzig, M. Mulder, & P. Turke (Eds.), Human reproductive behaviour (pp. 189–200). London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gallup, (2015). Fewer young people say I do to any relationship. Retrieved from:
  23. Ghiglieri, M. P. (1999). The dark side of man: tracing the origins of male violence. Reading: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
  24. Gray, P. B., Garcia, J. R., Crosier, B. S., & Fisher, H. E. (2015). Dating and sexual behavior among single parents of young children in the United States. Journal of Sex Research, 52, 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gray, P. B., Franco, C., Garcia, J. R., Gesselman, A. N., & Fisher, H. E. (2016). Romantic dating attitudes and behaviors among single parents in the U.S. Personal Relationships, 23, 491–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guo, Q., Li, Y., & Yu, S. (2017). In-law and mate preferences in Chinese society and the role of traditional cultural values. Evolutionary Psychology, July–September, 1–11.Google Scholar
  27. Jones, G. (2012). Late marriage and low fertility in Singapore: the limits of policy. The Japanese Journal of Population, 10, 89–101.Google Scholar
  28. Keegan, J. (2004). A history of warfare. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  29. Keeley, L. (1996). War before civilization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lever, J., Frederick, D. A., & Peplau, L. A. (2006). Does size matter? Men’s and women’s views on penis size across the lifespan. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 7, 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Maner, J., & Kenrick, D. T. (2010). When adaptations go awry: functional and dysfunctional aspects of social anxiety. Social Issues and Policy Review, 4, 111–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mautz, B. S., Wong, B. B. M., Peters, R. A., & Jennions, M. D. (2013). Penis size interacts with body shape and height to influence male attractiveness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 6925–6930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morrison, T. G., Morrison, M. A., & Bradley, B. A. (2007). Correlates of gay men’s self-reported exposure to pornography. International Journal of Sexual Health, 19, 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Office for National Statistics. (2016). Population estimates by marital status and living arrangements, England and Wales: 2002 to 2015. Retrieved from:
  35. Perilloux, C., Fleischman, D. S., & Buss, D. M. (2011). Meet the parents: parent-offspring convergence and divergence in mate preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pew Research Center. (2006). Internet & American life project, Online Dating Survey 2005. Retrieved from:
  37. Pew Research Center. (2013). Online dating & relationships. Retrieved from:
  38. Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  39. Prause, N., Park, J., Leung, S., & Miller, G. (2015). Women’s preferences for penis size: a new research method using selection among 3d models. PLoS One, 10, e0133079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rosenfeld, M. J., Reuben, J. T., & Falcon, M. (2015). How couples meet and stay together, waves 1, 2, and 3: public version 3.04, plus wave 4 supplement version 1.02 and wave 5 supplement version 1.0 [computer files]. Stanford: Stanford University Libraries.Google Scholar
  41. Statistics Canada. (2017). Families, households and marital status: Key results from the 2016 census. Retrieved from:
  42. Ta, V. P., Gesselman, A. N., Perry, B. L., Fisher, H. E., & Garcia, J. R. (2017). Stress of singlehood: Marital status, domain-specific stress, and anxiety in a national U.S. sample. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 36, 461–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1988). The evolution of war and its cognitive foundations. Institute for Evolutionary Studies Technical Report, 88, 1–15.Google Scholar
  44. Trivers, R. L. (1985). Social evolution. Menlo Park: Benjamin/Cummings.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of NicosiaNicosiaCyprus

Personalised recommendations