Hague Journal on the Rule of Law

, Volume 11, Issue 2–3, pp 295–299 | Cite as

A Normatively Inflected, Sociologically Aware Account of the Rule of Law

  • Theunis RouxEmail author

The rule of law is an ‘essentially contested’ concept, everyone now seems to agree.1 But in what sense might it also be an ‘ethically thick’ one,2 and what does Martin Krygier’s work teach us about the significance of this alternative way of seeing things?

In his influential adaptation of W. B. Gallie’s framework, Jeremy Waldron argued that, at the heart of the centuries-old dispute over the rule of law, was ‘the practicability of law being in charge in a society’. What was in contention was not so much rival accounts of a ‘complex exemplar’ of this ideal but rival ‘proposals’ for how the complex (and possibly intractable) problem of making law rule in society is to be resolved. That being so, the rule of law was best understood as a ‘solution-’ rather than an ‘achievement-concept’.3

In adapting Gallie’s framework in this way, Waldron situated his account of the rule of law firmly in the tradition of highly abstract, empirically disentangled Anglo-American political philosophy. As in...



  1. Dewey J (1929) The quest for certainty: a study of the relation of knowledge and action. Putnam, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Gallie WB (1955–1956) Essentially contested concepts. Proc Aristot Soc New Ser 56:167–198Google Scholar
  3. Krygier M (2012) Philip Selznick: ideals in the world. Stanford University Press, StanfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Krygier M (2013) Still a rule of law guy. Recht der Werkelijkheid 34:1–6Google Scholar
  5. Krygier M (2016) The rule of law: pasts, presents, and two possible futures. Annu Rev Law Soc Sci 12:199–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lieberman D (2012) Why law? Philip Selznick and the study of normative systems. Issues Legal Scholarship 10:33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Putnam H (2002) The collapse of the fact-value dichotomy and other essays. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Selznick P (1984) Leadership in administration: a sociological interpretation. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  9. Selznick P (2008) A humanist science: values and ideals in social inquiry. Stanford University Press, StanfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Waldron J (2002) Is the rule of law an essentially contested concept (in Florida)? Law Philos 21:137–164Google Scholar
  11. Waldron J (2006) The core of the case against judicial review. Yale Law J 115:1346–1406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Williams B (1985) Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Fontana, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Williams B (2005) In the beginning was the deed: realism and moralism in political argument. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Professor of Law, UNSW SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations