Advertisement

Hague Journal on the Rule of Law

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 317–339 | Cite as

Judicial Independence Under Authoritarian Rule: An Institutional Approach to the Legal Tradition of the West

  • Hans Petter GraverEmail author
Article
  • 449 Downloads

Abstract

The autonomy of legal institutions is put on the most severe test when they are under attack by other organs of the state. The article discusses the Western legal tradition from an institutional perspective and the concepts of ‘institutions’, ‘path dependence’ and ‘rule of law’. Under this perspective, legal institutions have an autonomous development with characteristics that must be explained by their evolutionary origins. The article seeks to demonstrate that institutional theory deserves closer attention when studying law and political power and to place more the refined notions of the Western legal tradition and the Rule of law from legal research into the theoretical approach of institutional theory. Based on the example of judicial independence in Nazi Germany it seeks to test the explanatory power of institutional theory to legal phenomena.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the Institute for Advanced Study, University of Durham, England for providing me with an excellent research environment for much of the time spent researching this article. I would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for helpful criticism and comments.

References

  1. Angermund R (1990) Deutsche richtershaft 1919–1945. Fischer, Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  2. Aubert V (1989) Continuity and development in law and society. Norwegian University Press, OsloGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell J (2013) Path dependence and legal development. Tul L Rev 87(4):787Google Scholar
  4. Berman HJ (1983) Law and revolution the formation of the western legal tradition. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Canevaro M (2017) The rule of law as the measure of political legitimacy in the Greek City States. Hague J Rule Law 9:211–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cole DS (2013) The varieties of comparative institutional analysis. Wis Law Rev 2013:383–409Google Scholar
  7. Conquest R (1968) Justice and the legal system in the USSR. The Bodley Head, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Craig PP (1997) Formal and substantive conceptions of the rule of law: an analytical framework. Public Law 1997:467–487Google Scholar
  9. David R, Brierley JEC (1985) Major legal systems in the world today, 3rd edn. Stevens, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Dicey AV (1982) Introduction to the study of the law of the constitution, 8th edn. Liberty Fund, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  11. Ertman T (1997) Birth of the leviathan: building states and regimes in medieval and early modern Europe. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Faundez J (2016) Douglass North’s theory of institutions: lessons for law and development. Hague J Rule Law 8:373–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fraenkel E (1941) The dual state a contribution to the theory of dictatorship. Oxford University Press, New York (republished by The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd, New Jersey, 2006) Google Scholar
  14. Fraser D (2005) Law after Auschwitz towards a jurisprudence of the holocaust. Carolina Academic Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  15. Fukuyama F (2011) The origins of political order from prehuman times to the French revolution. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Garbe D (2000) Im Namen des Volkes?! Die Rechtlichen Grundlagen der Militärjustiz im NS-Staat und ihre „Bewältigung“ nach 1945. In: Nolz B, Popp W (eds) Erinnerungsarbeit Grundlage einer Kultur des Friedens. Lit, MünsterGoogle Scholar
  17. Gloppen S, Wilson BM, Gargarellea R, Skaar E, Kinander M (2010) Courts and power in Latin America and Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Graver HP (2015) Judges against justice on judges when the rule of law is under attack. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  19. Graver HP (2018) Why Adolf Hitler spared the judges: judicial opposition against the Nazi state. German Law J (forthcoming) Google Scholar
  20. Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M (2009) Governance matters VIII aggregate and individual governance indicators 1996–2008. In: Policy research working paper 4978. The World Bank Development Research Group Macroeconomics and Growth Team. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/4170/WPS4978.pdf
  21. Koch HW (1989) In the name of the Volk political justice in Hitler’s Germany. I.B. Tauris, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Linder M (1987) The supreme labor court in Nazi Germany: a jurisprudential analysis. Vittorio Klostermann, Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  23. MacCormick N, Weinberger O (1986) An institutional theory of law new approaches to legal positivism. Kluwer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Magen A (2016) Cracks in the foundations: understanding the great rule of law debate in the EU. JCMS 54(5):1050–1061Google Scholar
  25. Maas H (2017) Furchtlose Juristen Richter und Staatsanwälte gegen das NS-Unrecht. C.H. Beck, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  26. Møller J (2017) Medieval origins of the rule of law: the Gregorian Reforms as critical juncture? Hague J Rule Law 9:265–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mrozek A, Śledzińska-Simon A (2017) Constitutional review as an indispensable element of the rule of law? Poland as the divided state between political and legal constitutionalism, VerfBlog, 2017/1/12. https://verfassungsblog.de/constitutional-review-as-an-indispensable-element-of-the-rule-of-law-poland-as-the-divided-state-between-political-and-legal-constitutionalism/
  28. North DC (1991) Institutions. J Econ Perspect 5(1):97–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. North DC (2005) Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ostrom E (2005) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  31. Pelikán J (ed) (1971) The Czechoslovak political trials, 1950–1954. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Pierson P (2000) Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. Am Political Sci Rev 94(2):251–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Prado M, Trebilcock M (2009) Path dependence, development, and the dynamics of institutional reform. Univ Toronto Law J 59:341–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rottleuthner H (1992) Steuerung der Justiz in der DDR. Krit Vierteljahr Gesetzgeb Rechtswiss 75:237–264Google Scholar
  35. Rass C, Quadflieg PM (2011) Nachkriegskarrieren von Wehrmachtjuristen Ganz normale Richter? Kriegserfarung und Nachkriegskarrieren von Divisionsrichtern der Wehrmacht. In: Perels J, Wette W (eds) Mit reinem Gewissen Wehrmachtrichter in der Bundesrepublik und ihre Opfer. Aufbau, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  36. Raz J (2009) The authority of law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  37. Reitter E (1976) Franz Gürtner, Politische biographie eines deutschen Juristen 1881–1941. Dunker & Humblot, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rundle K (2009) The impossibility of an exterminatory legality: law and the holocaust. Univ Toronto Law J 2009:65–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sanchez Urribarri RA (2011) Courts between democracy and hybrid authoritarianism: evidence from the Venezuelan Supreme Court. Law & Soc Inquiry 36:854–884.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2011.01253.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shapiro M (1982) Courts a comparative and political analysis. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  41. Tamanaha B (2004) On the rule of law history, politics, theory. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tamm D (2005) How nordic are the old nordic laws? In: Tamm D, Vogt H (eds) How nordic are the nordic medieval laws?. Medieval legal history I. University of Copenhagen Press, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  43. Voigt S (2012) How to measure the rule of law. Kyklos 65:262–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Waldron J (2012) The rule of law and the measure of property. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zweigert K, Kötz H (1998) Introduction to comparative law, 3rd edn. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Private LawUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations