Hague Journal on the Rule of Law

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 5–19 | Cite as

Illiberal, Democratic and Non-Arbitrary?

Epicentre and Circumstances of a Rule of Law Crisis
Article

Abstract

In recent years, diverse threats across multiple countries to the Rule of law have been brought to the attention of the European Commission. Focus has mainly centred on the Article 7 TEU procedure. This paper argues that EU oversight should be considered as having regard to its internal premises and credibility; the question can be posed whether EU censorship is affected by a ever-encroaching weakness that currently characterises the present relationships between States and regional or supranational orders, whose authority is met at times with resistance. Zooming out from the daily threats to the Rule of law in so-called illiberal or populist governments, this paper scrutinises some usual theoretical tools and conceptual frameworks, namely the connection between arbitrariness and the Rule of law on one hand, and the Rule of law and the overall idea of public law on the other. It suggests that the present crisis is part of a seismic shift of the main components of the idea of public law that underpin the modern and contemporary state. After examining further case law and evidence of arbitrariness and non-arbitrariness that exceeds the features of the Rule of law, this paper challenges the conviction that a generic notion of arbitrariness can capture the problem of illiberal governmental actions, or justify the European Union attitude in responding to a ‘Rule of law crisis’.

Keywords

Democracy Illiberal democracies Rule of law Public law European Union law Populism Financial crisis 

References

  1. Bentham J (1970) Of laws in general. In: Burns JH, Hart HLA (eds) The collected works of Jeremy Bentham. The Athlone, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Carp R (2014) The struggle for the rule of law in Romania as an EU member state: the role of the cooperation and verification mechanism. Utrecht Law Rev 10(1). http://www.utrechtlawreview.org. URN:NBN:NL:UI:10-1-115809. Accessed June 2017
  3. Cassese S (2009) Il diritto globale. Einaudi, TorinoGoogle Scholar
  4. Cassese S (2010) Lo Stato fascista. Il Mulino, BolognaGoogle Scholar
  5. Chalmers D (2016) Crisis reconfiguration of the European constitutional state. In: Chalmers D, Jachtenfuchs M, Joerges C (eds) The end of eurocrats’ dream. Adjusting to European diversity. CUP, Cambridge, pp 266–298Google Scholar
  6. Closa C (2016) Reinforcing EU monitoring of the rule of law. Normative arguments, institutional proposals and the procedural limitations. In: Closa C, Kochenov D (eds) Reinforcing rule of law oversight in the European Union. CUP, Cambridge, pp 15–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Closa C, Kochenov D (eds) (2016) Reinforcing rule of law oversight in the European Union. CUP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. De Felice R (2005) Le interpretazioni del fascismo. Laterza, BariGoogle Scholar
  9. De Secondat Baron de Montesquieu Ch (2012) Pensée. In: Clark R (trans) My thoughts. Liberty Fund, Indianapolis. http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/montesquieu-my-thoughts-mes-pensees-1720-2012. Accessed June 2017
  10. Fuller LL (1969) The morality of law, rev edn. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  11. Habermas J (1996) Between facts and norms. Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy, translated by William Rehg. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Habermas J (1998) Remarks on legitimation through human rights. Philos Soc Crit 24(2–3):157–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Habermas J (2015) Democracy in Europe: why the development of the EU into a Transnational democracy is necessary and how it is possible. Eur Law J 21(4):546–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Habermas J ([1981] 1986)) Law as medium and law as institution [trans Theorie des kommunicativen Handelns] bd. II, Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, pp 522–547. In: Teubner G (ed) Dilemmas of law in the welfare State (reprint 2011). de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 203–220Google Scholar
  15. Howarth D (ed) (2015) Ernesto Laclau: post-Marxism, populism and critique. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Hume D ([1751, 1777 ed] 1912) Enquiry concerning the principles of morals, Open Court Pub., Chicago, at https://archive.org/details/enquiryconcern00hume. Accessed June 2017
  17. Joerges C (2007) How the rule of law might survive the new turn to governance. Working Paper no 9, RECON, 2Google Scholar
  18. Joerges C (2016) Integration through law and the crisis of law in Europe’s emergency. In: Chalmers D, Jachtenfuchs M, Joerges C (eds) The end of eurocrats’ dream. Adjusting to European diversity. CUP, Cambridge, pp 299–338Google Scholar
  19. Kant I ([1797] 1996) Metaphysical first principles of the doctrine of right. In: Mary G (trans) The metaphysics of morals (repr. 2003). Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Kilpatrick C (2015) On the rule of law and economic emergency: the degradation of basic legal values in Europe’s bailouts. Oxford J Legal Stud 35(2):325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kingsbury B, Krisch N (2006) Introduction: global governance and global administrative law in the international legal order. Eur J Int’l L 17:13Google Scholar
  22. Krygier M (2016) The rule of law: pasts, presents, and two possible futures. Annu Rev Law Soc Sci 12:199–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laclau E (2013) The rhetorical foundations of society. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Locke J (1946) Two treatises on government. In: Gough JW (ed) Second treatise bk II. Of civil government, ch IX. Of the ends of political society and government. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. Loughlin M (2010) Foundations of public law. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Martin J (ed) (2013) Chantal Mouffe: hegemony, radical democracy, and the political. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. McIlwain CH (1940) Constitutionalism: ancient and modern. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, p 85Google Scholar
  28. Mouffe C (2013) Agonistics: thinking the world politically. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Palombella G (2010) The rule of law as an institutional ideal. In: Morlino L, Palombella G (eds) Rule of law and democracy. Brill, Leiden, pp 3–37Google Scholar
  30. Palombella G (2013) The (re)constitution of the public in a global arena. In: McAmlaigh C, Michelon C, Walker N (eds) After public Law?. OUP, Oxford, pp 286–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Palombella G (2016a) Beyond legality—before democracy Rule of law caveats in the EU two-level system. In: Closa C, Kochenov D (eds) Reinforcing rule of law oversight in the European Union. CUP, Cambridge, pp 36–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Palombella G (2016b) The rule of law at home and abroad. Hague J Rule Law 1:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pettit Ph (1997) Republicanism: a theory of freedom and government. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  34. Rawls J (1999) A theory of justice. Rev edn. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Reid Ph (2004) Rule of law. The Jurisprudence of liberty in the seventeenth and eighteenth century. North Illinois University Press, DeKalbGoogle Scholar
  36. Rousseau J-J (1997) The social contract and other later political writings, V, Gurevitch edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  37. Schmidt VA (2013) Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union revisited: input, output and ‘throughput’. Polit Stud 61(1):2–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Waldron J (2011) The rule of law and the importance of procedure. In: Fleming JE (ed) Getting to the rule of law (Nomos 50). New York University Press, New York, pp 3–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Walker N (2014) Intimations of global law. CUP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  40. Weiler JHH (2012) In the face of crisis: input legitimacy, output legitimacy and the political messianism of European integration. J Eur Integr 34(7):825–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weiler JHH (2016) Epilogue: living in a glass house: Europe, democracy and the rule of law. In: Closa C, Kochenov D (eds) Reinforcing rule of law oversight in the European Union. CUP, Cambridge, pp 313–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. West R (2011) The limits of process. In: Fleming (a cura di) JE (ed) Getting to the rule of law. New York University Press, New York, pp 32–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Scuola Sant’AnnaPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations