Hague Journal on the Rule of Law

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 27–47 | Cite as

Framing the Court: Political Reactions to the Ruling on the Declaration of Sovereignty of the Catalan Parliament

Article
First Online:

Abstract

This article analyses the reactions by political actors to the ruling of the Spanish Constitutional Court on the Declaration of Sovereignty of the Catalan parliament. It is suggested that political framings of the ruling can be classified into the legalist, attitudinal and institutional academic models of judicial behaviour. As will be shown, these models have a normative dimension, with implications for the ideal of the rule of law. These implications are skilfully captured and exploited by political actors as part of a wider battle for the framing of the ruling. The rule of law thus becomes politicised as a result of the tension around the judicialisation of the so-called Catalan ‘sovereignist process’.

Keywords

Rule of law Spanish Constitutional Court Catalonia Framing theory Judicial decision-making 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Agranoff R, Ramos Gallarín JA (1997) Toward federal democracy in Spain: an examination of intergovernmental relations. Publius 27:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aja E, Colino C (2014) Multilevel structures, coordination and partisan politics in Spanish intergovernmental relations. Comp Eur Polit 12:444–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alter K (1998) Explaining national court acceptance of European Court jurisprudence: a critical evaluation of theories of legal integration. In: Slaughter AM et al (eds) The European Court and national courts: doctrine and jurisprudence. Hart Publishing, London, pp 225–250Google Scholar
  4. Bailey MA, Maltzman F (2011) The constrained court. Law, politics and the decisions the justices make. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  5. Baird V, Gangl A (2006) Shattering the myth of legality: the impact of the media’s framing of Supreme Court procedures on perceptions of fairness. Polit Psychol 27:597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bassok O, Dotan Y (2013) Solving the countermajoritarian difficulty? Int J Const Law 11:13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bogoch B, Holzman-Gazit Y (2008) Mutual bonds: media frames and the Israeli High Court of Justice. Law Soc Inq 33:53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chong D, Druckman JN (2007) Framing theory. Annu Rev Polit Sci 10:103–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clayton CW (1999) The Supreme Court and political jurisprudence: new and old institutionalisms. In: Gillman H, Clayton CW (eds) Supreme Court decision-making: new institutionalist approaches. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 15–41Google Scholar
  10. Dyevre A (2010) Unifying the field of comparative judicial politics: towards a general theory of judicial behavior. Eur Polit Sci Rev 2:297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferret Jacas J (2011) Nació, símbols i drets historics. Revista d’Estudis Autonòmics i Federals 12:44Google Scholar
  12. Gillman H, Clayton CW (1999) Supreme Court decision-making: new institutionalist approaches. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  13. Hopkin J (2009) Devolution and party politics in Britain and Spain. Party Polit 15:179–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kyritsis D (2012) Constitutional review in representative democracy. Oxf J Leg Stud 32:297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Landau D (2005) The two discourses in Colombian constitutional jurisprudence: a new approach to modeling judicial behavior in Latin America. George Wash Int Law Rev 37:687Google Scholar
  16. Lax JR (2011) The new judicial politics of legal doctrine. Annu Rev Polit Sci 14:131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Martí D (2013) The 2012 Catalan election: the first step towards independence? Reg Federal Stud 23:507–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Martinez-Herrera E (2002) From nation-building to building identification with political communities: consequences of political decentralization in Spain, the Basque Country, Catalonia and Galicia. Eur J Polit Res 41:421–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moreno L (1997) Federalization and ethnoterritorial concurrence in Spain. Publius 27:65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moreno L (2002) Decentralization in Spain. Reg Stud 36:399–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nelson T, Kinder DR (1996) Issue frames and group-centrism in American public opinion. J Polit 58:1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nicholson S, Howard RM (2003) Framing support for the Supreme Court in the aftermath of Bush v. Gore. J Polit 65:676–677Google Scholar
  23. Redher B (2007) What is political about jurisprudence? Courts, politics and political science in Europe and the United States, MPIfG Discussion Paper 07/5Google Scholar
  24. Rosenfeld M (2001) The rule of law and the legitimacy of constitutional democracy. South Calif Law Rev 74:1307Google Scholar
  25. Sala G (2014) Federalism without adjectives in Spain. Publius 44:109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Segal J, Spaeth H (2002) The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model revisited. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shapiro M (2002) The success of judicial review and democracy. In: Shapiro M, Stone Sweet A (eds) On Law politics and judicialization. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Spaeth H (2010) Reflections about judicial politics. In: Caldeira G et al (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  29. Tremblay LB (2003) General legitimacy of judicial review and the fundamental basis of constitutional law. Oxf J Legal Stud 23:525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Viver Pi-Sunyer C (2011) El Tribunal Constitucional, ¿’Sempre, només…i indiscutible’? La funció constitucional dels estatuts en l’àmbit de la distribución de competències segons la STC 31/2010. Revista d’Estudis Autonòmics i Federals 12:363Google Scholar
  31. Wedeking J (2010) Supreme Court litigants and strategic framing. Am Polit Sci Rev 54:617CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations