Advertisement

Experimental Techniques

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 75–84 | Cite as

Optimization of Single Point Incremental Forming Process Using Ball Nose Tool

  • R.B. AzhiriEmail author
  • F. Rahimidehgolan
  • F. Javidpour
  • R.M. Tekiyeh
  • S.M. Moussavifard
  • A.S. Bideskan
Article
  • 53 Downloads

Abstract

In the present work, an attempt is made to study effect of tool geometry on incremental forming performance of annealed aluminum 5052. Here, type of the tool, feed rate and step down are considered as process input parameters and their effects on forming height and surface roughness are studied. Total numbers of 18 experiments have been carried out according to full factorial experimental design. In order to find optimal parameter setting, adaptive network based fuzzy inference system has been associated with simulated annealing algorithm. Here, the optimal results were selected to maximize the forming height and minimize the surface roughness. The obtained results revealed that using the ball nose tool significantly enhances the formability and surface quality due to conversion of sliding friction to rolling type. In addition, it is found that selection of ball nose tool as well as feed rate of 200 mm/min and step down of 0.4 mm causes achievement of desired quality characteristics.

Keywords

Single point incremental forming Ball nose tool Formability Surface roughness Optimization Artificial intelligence 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Cerro I, Maidagan E, Arana J, Rivero A, Rodriguez PP (2006 Jul 3) Theoretical and experimental analysis of the dieless incremental sheet forming process. J Mater Process Technol 177(1–3):404–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rattanachan K, Chungchoo C (2009) Formability in single point incremental forming of dome geometry. Asian International Journal of Science and Technology in Production and Manufacturing Engineering 2(4):57–63Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fratini L, Ambrogio G, Di Lorenzo R, Filice L, Micari F (2004) Influence of mechanical properties of the sheet material on formability in single point incremental forming. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 53(1):207–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Henrard C, Bouffioux C, Eyckens P, Sol H, Duflou JR, Van Houtte P, Van Bael A, Duchene L, Habraken AM (2011) Forming forces in single point incremental forming: prediction by finite element simulations, validation and sensitivity. Comput Mech 47(5):573–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Strano M (2005) Technological representation of forming limits for negative incremental forming of thin aluminum sheets. J Manuf Process 7(2):122–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jackson K, Allwood J (2009) The mechanics of incremental sheet forming. J Mater Process Technol 209(3):1158–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim TJ, Yang DY (2000) Improvement of formability for the incremental sheet metal forming process. Int J Mech Sci 42(7):1271–1286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Micari F, Ambrogio G. A common shape for conducting incremental forming tests. In1st Incremental Forming Workshop, University of Saarbrucken 2004 Jun (Vol. 9)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Iseki H, Naganawa T (2002) Vertical wall surface forming of rectangular shell using multistage incremental forming with spherical and cylindrical rollers. J Mater Process Technol 130:675–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mostafanezhad H, Menghari HG, Esmaeili S, Shirkharkolaee EM (2018) Optimization of two-point incremental forming process of AA1050 through response surface methodology. Measurement:21–28Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Asghari SA, Shamsi Sarband A, Habibnia M (2017) Optimization of multiple quality characteristics in two-point incremental forming of aluminum 1050 by grey relational analysis. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci:0954406217693658Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Al-Obaidi A, Kräusel V, Landgrebe D (2016) Hot single-point incremental forming assisted by induction heating. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82(5–8):1163–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Amini S, Gollo AH, Paktinat H (2017) An investigation of conventional and ultrasonic-assisted incremental forming of annealed AA1050 sheet. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90(5–8):1569–1578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Magee J, De Vin LJ (2002) Process planning for laser-assisted forming. J Mater Process Technol 120(1–3):322–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Azhiri RB, Teimouri R, Baboly MG, Leseman Z (2014) Application of Taguchi, ANFIS and grey relational analysis for studying, modeling and optimization of wire EDM process while using gaseous media. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71(1–4):279–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Teimouri R, Baseri H (2015) Forward and backward predictions of the friction stir welding parameters using fuzzy-artificial bee colony-imperialist competitive algorithm systems. J Intell Manuf 26(2):307–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Teimouri R, Baseri H (2014) Optimization of magnetic field assisted EDM using the continuous ACO algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 14:381–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Teimouri R, Amini S (2018 May) Forward and reverse mapping of multiresponses turning process using adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system and simulated annealing algorithm. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 232(10):1746–1758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Teimouri R, Ashrafi H (2017) Optimization of hydroforming process for deep drawing of AA7075 using finite element simulation and response surface methodology. Trans Indian Inst Metals 70(9):2265–2275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    El-Khabeery MM, El-Axir MH (2001) Experimental techniques for studying the effects of milling roller-burnishing parameters on surface integrity. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41(12):1705–1719CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • R.B. Azhiri
    • 1
    Email author
  • F. Rahimidehgolan
    • 2
  • F. Javidpour
    • 3
  • R.M. Tekiyeh
    • 4
  • S.M. Moussavifard
    • 5
  • A.S. Bideskan
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Texas at DallasDallasUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringBu-Alisina UniversityHamedanIran
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of North CarolinaCharlotteUSA
  4. 4.Department of Mechanical EngineeringK.N Toosi University of TechnologyTehranIran
  5. 5.Fooladyar Cooperative CompanyNeyshabourIran
  6. 6.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of TabrizTabrizIran

Personalised recommendations