Advertisement

Experimental Techniques

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 81–89 | Cite as

Investigation on Wet Skid Resistance of Tread Rubber

  • J. WuEmail author
  • C. Zhang
  • Y. Wang
  • B. Su
  • B. Gond
Article
  • 63 Downloads

Abstract

Wet skid resistance is one of the basic properties for tread rubber, which plays an important role in driving performance of vehicles. Firstly, a new test device has been developed for testing wet skid resistance of tread rubber. Then, effect of filled nano silicon, water film depth, normal load and sliding velocity on friction properties of tread rubber have been studied, and contact pressure under different pavement parameters of Rsm, Ra also has been investigated. Finally, friction surface morphology of tread rubber has been investigated by OLYMPUS-DSX510 Optical Digital Microscope. Results indicate that nano silicon instead of silica (white carbon black) can significantly improve wet skid resistance with the same mechanical properties, replacement ratio of 40% is the best; friction coefficient of tread rubber block decreases when the normal load increases, however, it increases and then decreases when sliding velocity increases under dry and wet conditions; contact pressure increases with the increase of Rsm, however, it decreases when Ra increases.

Keywords

Wet skid resistance Tread rubber Finite element analysis Macro and micro properties 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is funded by the joint construction project of HIT and Weihai (2017DXGJ11), Major Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51790502) and Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation Youth Program (ZR2018QEE004).

References

  1. 1.
    Persson BNJ (2007) Wet adhesion with application to tree frog adhesive toe pads and tires. J Phys Condens Matter 19(37):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Persson BNJ (2011) Rubber friction and tire dynamics. J Phys Condens Matter 23(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rajesh R, Gridsada P, Damrongrit P, Jae YL (2012) Algorithms for real-time estimation of individual wheel tire-road friction coefficients. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 17(6):1183–1195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang Y, Wu Y, Li W, Zhang L (2011) Influence of filler type on wet skid resistance of SSBR/BR composites: effects from roughness and micro-hardness of rubber surface. Appl Surf Sci 257:2058–2065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alauddin A, Tighesusan L (2012) Asphalt pavements surface texture and skid resistance—exploring the reality. Can J Civ Eng 39(1):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Torbruegge S, Wies B (2015) Characterization of pavement texture by means of height difference correlation and relationtowetskid resistance. Journal of Traffic & Transportation Engineering 2(2):59–67Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kogbara RB, Masad EA, Kassem E, Scarpas A, Anupam K (2016) A state-of-the-art review of parameters influencing measurement and modeling of skid resistance of asphalt pavements. Constr Build Mater 114:602–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Minh-Tan D, Veronique C, Yannick B, Malal K (2014) Influence of thin water film on skid resistance. Journal of Traffic & Transportation Engineering 2:36–44Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hadiwardoyo SP, Sinaga ES, Fikri H (2013) The influence of Buton asphalt additive on skid resistance based on penetration index and temperature. Constr Build Mater 42(9):5–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Seta E, Nakajima Y (2000) Hydroplaning analysis by FEM and FVM effect of tire rolling and tire pattern on hydroplaning. Tire Sci Technol 28(30):140–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lorenz B, Oh YR, Nam SK, Jeon SH (2015) Rubber friction on road surfaces: experiment and theory for low sliding speeds. J Chem Phys 142(19):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang Y, Ma J, Zhang L, Wu Y (2011) Revisiting the correlations between wet skid resistance and viscoelasticity of rubber composites via comparing carbon black and silica fillers. Polym Test 30(5):557–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kane M, Edmondson V (2018) Modeling the bitumen scour effect: enhancement of a dynamic friction model to predict the skid resistance of rubber upon asphalt pavement surfaces subjected to wear by traffic polishing. Wear 400-401:100–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Skouvaklis G, Blackford JR, Koutsos V (2012) Friction of rubber on ice: a new machine, influence of rubber properties and sliding parameters. Tribol Int 49(11):44–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Venkatesh S (1975) Laboratory studies of the friction of rubber on ice. Tribol Int 8(2):51–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Charlton J, Yang J (1994) A review of methods to characterize rubber elastic behavior for use in finite element analysis. Rubber Chem Technol 67(3):481–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Amin AF, Wiraguna SI, Bhuiyan AR, Okui Y (2006) Hyperelasticity model for finite element analysis of natural and high damping rubbers in compression and shear. J Eng Mech 132(1):54–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yoon SH, Winters M, Siviour CR (2016) High strain-rate tensile characterization of epdm rubber using non-equilibrium loading and the virtual fields method. Exp Mech 56(1):25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Persson BNJ (2000) Theory of rubber friction and contact mechanics. J Chem Phys 115(8):3840–3861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Persson BNJ (2000) Qualitative theory of rubber friction and wear. J Chem Phys 112(4):2021–2029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yeager RW (1974) Tire hydroplaning: testing, analysis, and design. New York: springer USGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sabey BE, Williams T, Lupton GN (1970) Factors affecting the friction of tires on wet roads. MIS Q 7(4):11–17Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mi X, Cai ZB, Xiong XM, Qian H, et al (2016) Investigation on fretting wear behavior of 690 alloy in water under various temperatures. Tribol Int 100:400–409Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Daughert TL, Sides NT (1981) Frictional characteristics of water-lubricated compliant-surface stave bearings. ASLE Transactions 24(3):293–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Arun PN, Gnanamoorthy R, Kamaraj M (2010) Friction and wear behavior of surface nanocrystallized aluminium alloy underdry sliding condition. Mater Sci Eng B 168(1–3):176–181Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pellizzari M (2011) High temperature wear and friction behaviour of nitrided, PVD-duplex and CVD coated tool steel against 6082 Al alloy. Wear 271(9–10):2089–2099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Goryacheva I, Makhovskaya Y (2017) Combined effect of surface microgeometry and adhesion in normal and sliding contacts of elastic bodies. Friction 5(3):339–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Rubber Composite Materials and StructuresHarbin Institute of TechnologyWeihaiChina
  2. 2.Center for Composite Materials and StructuresHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina
  3. 3.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentIndian Institute of Technology KanpurKanpurIndia

Personalised recommendations