Advertisement

Drop on Demand Colloidal Suspension Inkjet Patterning for DIC

  • S. Koumlis
  • S. Pagano
  • G. Retuerta del Rey
  • Y. Kim
  • P. Jewell
  • M. Noh
  • L. Lamberson
Article
  • 62 Downloads

Abstract

Digital image correlation (DIC) is a non-contact, optical, full-field displacement measurement technique used to map deformations on a body under an applied load by tracking surface features. It is a widely used method in experimental mechanics, owed in part to its ease of setup, and applicability across length scales and material systems. Most commonly, DIC surface patterns consist of contrasting black and white speckles applied by spray paint or an airbrush, which can lack control and consistency of the distribution of speckle sizes. In this paper, drop on demand (DOD) inkjet printing of colloidal suspensions is introduced as a means to apply a speckle pattern with precision on the micro- to mesoscale. A dot array and pseudo-random DOD pattern are applied to high-density polyethylene (HDPE) specimens, tested in compression following ASTM D695-15, and compared with a traditional airbrush speckle method. The results show that the DOD pseudo-random pattern provides a more consistent strain measurement than the other two methods. The array DOD and airbrush patterns introduce erroneous signals which can be explained on the basis of two different principles. A directional pattern, such as the array DOD, is known to introduce errors in the displacement vector identification. For the random airbrush pattern, a quantification of the speckle sizes revealed a large fraction of speckles that had a characteristic length scale of around 1 pixel, which is known to introduce bias errors, since the sampling of the speckle pattern does not satisfy the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem. These findings illustrate the utility of DOD speckling for certain DIC applications.

Keywords

Digital image correlation Speckle Drop on demand inkjet printing HDPE 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge support of this research through the American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund No. PRFSS860-ND10, the Office of Naval Research Young Investigator Award No. N00014-17-1-2497, the National Science Foundation Award No. 1636190, and the Office of Naval Research Award No. N00014-17-2644.

References

  1. 1.
    Sutton M, Wolters W, Peters W, Ranson W, McNeill S (1983) Determination of displacements using an improved digital correlation method. Image Vis Comput 1(3):133–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schreier H, Orteu J-J, Sutton MA (2009) Image correlation for shape, motion and deformation measurements. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sutton MA, Orteu JJ, Schreier H (2009) Image correlation for shape, motion and deformation measurements: basic concepts, theory and applications. Springer Science & Business Media, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reu P (2015) DIC: a revolution in experimental mechanics. Exp Tech 39(6):1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Daly SH (2010) Digital image correlation in experimental mechanics for aerospace materials and structures. In: Encyclopedia of aerospace engineering. American Cancer Society.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470686652.eae542
  6. 6.
    Yoneyama S, Kitagawa A, Iwata S, Tani K, Kikuta H (2007) Bridge deflection measurement using Digital Image Correlation. Exp Tech 31(1):34–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hoult NA, Take WA, Lee C, Dutton M (2013) Experimental accuracy of two dimensional strain measurements using Digital Image Correlation. Eng Struct 46:718–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kammers A, Daly S (2011) Small-scale patterning methods for Digital Image Correlation under scanning electron microscopy. Meas Sci Technol 22(12):125501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sutton MA, Li N, Garcia D, Cornille N, Orteu JJ, McNeill SR, Schreier HW, Li X (2006) Metrology in a scanning electron microscope: theoretical developments and experimental validation. Meas Sci Technol 17(10):2613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sutton MA, Li N, Joy D, Reynolds AP, Li X (2007) Scanning electron microscopy for quantitative small and large deformation measurements part i: SEM imaging at magnifications from 200 to 10,000. Exp Mech 47 (6):775–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sutton MA, Li N, Garcia D, Cornille N, Orteu J, McNeill S, Schreier H, Li X, Reynolds AP (2007) Scanning electron microscopy for quantitative small and large deformation measurements part II: experimental validation for magnifications from 200 to 10,000. Exp Mech 47(6):789–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lane C, Burguete RL, Shterenlikht A (2008) An objective criterion for the selection of an optimum dic pattern and subset size. In: Proceedings of the XIth International Congress and Exposition, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bossuyt S (2013) Optimized patterns for Digital Image Correlation. In: Imaging methods for novel materials and challenging applications. Springer, vol 3, pp 239–248Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reu P (2014) All about speckles: speckle size measurement. Exp Tech 38(6):1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Malesa M, Szczepanek D, Kujawińska M, Świercz A, Kołakowski P (2010) Monitoring of civil engineering structures using Digital Image Correlation technique. In: EPJ web of conferences. EDP Sciences, vol 6, p 31014Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gamache R, Santini-Bell E (2009) Non-intrusive digital optical means to develop bridge performance information. In: Non-destructive testing in civil engineering, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim Y, Ren X, Kim J, Noh H (2014) Direct inkjet printing of micro-scale silver electrodes on polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microchip. J Micromech Microeng 24(11):115010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim Y, Kim JW, Kim J, Noh M (2017) A novel fabrication method of parylene-based microelectrodes utilizing inkjet printing. Sensors Actuators B Chem 238:862–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fujifilm Dimatix (2016) Dimatix Materials Printer DMP-2850 Datasheet, Rev. 03 EditionGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Martienssen W, Warlimont H (2006) Springer handbook of condensed matter and materials data. Springer Science & Business Media, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reu PL, Toussaint E, Jones E, Bruck HA, Iadicola M, Balcaen R, Turner DZ, Siebert T, Lava PL, Simonsen M (2017) DIC challenge: developing images and guidelines for evaluating accuracy and resolution of 2D analyses. Exp Mech 3:1–33Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    ASTM D695-15 (2015) Standard test method for compressive properties of rigid plastics, ASTM International, Standard, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lava P, Debruyne D (2010) MatchIDGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schreier HW, Hubert W, Joachim R, Sutton MA (2000) Systematic errors in digital image correlation caused by intensity interpolation. Opt Eng 39(11):2915–2922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    MATLAB (2016), version, 9.1.0 (R2016b), The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pagano S, Hogan J, Lamberson L (2016) Bone and bone surrogate fragmentation under dynamic compression. Journal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials 2(2):234–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hogan JD, Rogers RJ, Spray JG, Boonsue S (2012) Dynamic fragmentation of granite for impact energies of 6-28J. Eng Fract Mech 79:103–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lecompte D, Smits A, Bossuyt S, Sol H, Vantomme J, Van Hemelrijck D, Habraken A (2006) Quality assessment of speckle patterns for Digital Image Correlation. Opt Lasers Eng 44(11):1132–1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Reu P (2015) All about speckles: contrast. Exp Tech 39(1):1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pan B, Lu Z, Xie H (2010) Mean intensity gradient: an effective global parameter for quality assessment of the speckle patterns used in digital image correlation. Opt Lasers Eng 48(4):469–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sutton MA, Yan JH, Tiwari V, Schreier HW, Orteu J (2008) The effect of out-of-plane motion on 2D and 3D digital image correlation measurements. Opt Lasers Eng 46(10):746–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Reu P (2015) All about speckles: edge sharpness. Exp Tech 39(2):1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Koumlis
    • 1
  • S. Pagano
    • 1
  • G. Retuerta del Rey
    • 1
  • Y. Kim
    • 1
  • P. Jewell
    • 1
  • M. Noh
    • 1
  • L. Lamberson
    • 1
  1. 1.Drexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations