Advertisement

Experimental Techniques

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 453–458 | Cite as

A new patterning method for microstructural strain mapping of Al-5754 alloy using image correlation

  • S. Nagarajan
  • R. Prakash
Brief Technical Note
  • 85 Downloads

Abstract

A new, simple chemical etching based surface patterning method for microstructural strain mapping of Al-5754 alloy is proposed. This method reveals the grain boundaries and micro-constituents of the alloy which can serve as high contrast random dot pattern for microstructural strain calculation using digital image correlation. The suitability of the surface pattern developed by this method to accurately map the microstructural strain evolution during tensile deformation with adequate spatial resolution to address intragranular strain heterogeneities has been quantitatively assessed and demonstrated.

Keywords

Aluminum alloy Digital image correlation Microstructural strain map Random dot pattern Chemical etching 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Srinivasan Nagarajan gratefully acknowledges the Science and Engineering Research Board, Department of Science and Technology, Government of India for funding this work (PDF/2016/003984).

References

  1. 1.
    Mello AW, Nicolas A, Lebensohn RA, Sangid MD (2016) Effect of microstructure on strain localization in a 7050 aluminum alloy: Comparison of experiments and modeling for various textures. Mater Sci Eng A 661:187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Martin G, Sinclair CW, Lebensohn RA (2014) Microscale plastic strain heterogeneity in slip dominated deformation of magnesium alloy containing rare earth. Mater Sci Eng A 603:37–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fazzini M, Mistou S, Dalverny O, Robert L (2010) Study of image characteristics on digital image correlation error assessment. Opt Lasers Eng 48:335–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carter JLW, Uchic MD, Mills MJ (2015) Impact of speckle pattern parameters on DIC strain resolution calculated from in-situ SEM experiments. In: Carroll J, Daly S (eds) Fracture, Fatigue, Failure, and Damage Evolution. Springer, Cham, pp 119–126Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reu P (2015) All about speckles: Speckle density. Exp Tech 39:1–2Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sutton, M.A. (2008) Digital image correlation for shape and deformation measurements. In: Sharpe, Jr., William, N. (eds.) Springer Handbook of Experimental Solid Mechanics, pp. 565–600. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pan B, Lu Z, Xie H (2010) An effective global parameter for quality assessment of speckle patterns used in digital image correlation. Opt Lasers Eng 48:469–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Biery N, Graef MD, Pollock TM (2003) A method for measuring microsctructural-scale strains using a scanning electron microscope: Applications to γ titanium aluminides. Metall Mater Trans A 34:2301–2313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    YanJie L, HuiMin X, Qiang L, ChangZhi G, ZhenXing H, PengWan C, QingMing Z (2012) Fabrication technique of micro/nano-scale speckle patterns with focused ion beam. Sci China-Phys Mech Astron 55:1037–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sutton MA, Ke X, Lessner SM, Goldbach M, Yost M, Zhao F, Schreier HW (2008) Strain field measurements on mouse carotid arteries using microscopic three-dimensional digital image correlation. J Biodmed Mater Res Part A 84:178–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thompson MS, Schell H, Lienau J, Duda GN (2007) Digital image correlation: a technique for determining local mechanical conditions within early bone callus. Med Eng Phys 29:820–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Githens A, Daly S (2017) Patterning corrosion-susceptible metallic alloys for digital image correlation in a scanning electron microscope. Strain 53:12215–12221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nicoletto G, Martin T, Anzelotti G, Roncella R (2011) Application of high magnification digital image correlation technique to micromechanical strain analysis. Strain 47:66–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nagarajan S, Jain MK, Wilkinson DS, Mishra RK (2018) Effective approaches towards microstructural strain mapping of AZ31B Mg sheet material using digital image correlation. Opt Laser Eng 102:17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Davidkov A, Jain MK, Petrov RH, Wilkinson DS, Mishra RK (2012) Strain localization and damage development during bending of Al-Mg alloy sheets. Mater Sci Eng A 50:395–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Graff WR, Sargent DC (1981) A new grain-boundary etchant for aluminum alloys. Metallography 14:69–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mohammadtaheri M (2012) A new metallographic technique for revealing grain boundaries in aluminum alloys. Metallogr Microstruct Anal 1:224–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang, Y., Lava, P., Coppieters, S., Strycker, M.D., Van Houtte, P., Debruyne, D.: Investigation of the uncertainty of DIC under heterogeneous strain states with numerical tests. Strain 48, 453–462 (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Engler O, Kuhnke K, Hasenclever J (2017) Development of intermetallic particles during solidification and homogenization of two AA 5xxx series Al-Mg alloys with different Mg contents. J Alloys Compd 728:669–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kumar S, Babu NH, Scamans GM, Dmitry GE, Zhongyun F (2012) Solidification behaviour of an AA5754 Al alloy ingot cast with high impurity content. Int J Mater Res 103:1228–1234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sun Z, Lyons JS, McNeill SR (1997) Measuring microscopic deformations with digital image correlation. Opt Lasers Eng 27:409–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Reu., P (2015) All about speckles: Contrast. Exp. Tech 39:1–2Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang Y, Topping TD, Lavernia EJ, Nutt SR (2014) Dynamic micro-strain analysis of ultrafine-grained aluminum magnesium alloy using digital image correlation. Metall Mater Trans A 45:47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Moulart R, Rotinat R, Pierron F, Lerondel G (2007) On the realization of microscopic grids for local strain measurement by direct interferometric photolithography. Opt Lasers Eng 45:1137–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sachtleber M, Zhao Z, Raabe D (2002) Experimental investigation of plastic grain interaction. Mater Sci Eng A 336:81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Raabe D, Sachtleber M, Zhao Z, Roters F, Zaeferrer S (2001) Micromechanical and macromechanical effects in grain scale polycrystal plasticity experimental and simulation. Acta Mater 49:3433–3441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ghadbeigi H, Pinna C, Celotto S (2012) Quantitative strain analysis of the large deformation at the scale of microstructure: comparison between digital Image correlation and microgrid techniques. Exp Mech 52:1483–1492CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology MadrasChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations