Advertisement

Experimental Techniques

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 1179–1185 | Cite as

In Situ Monitoring of Rail Squats in Three Dimensions Using Ultrasonic Technique

  • S. Kaewunruen
  • M. Ishida
Article

Abstract

Rail squats and studs are typically classified as the growth of any cracks that have grown longitudinally through the subsurface of rails. This study highlights in situ monitoring of squat/stud distribution and its growth in the field. Squat/stud growth has been determined and plotted using the ultrasonic measurement device and the crack depths at each reference grid node form a three-dimensional contour of rail squat crack. In this study, the crack propagation of squats/studs is roughly estimated to be almost linear to repeated train loads called as accumulated passing tonnages up to a certain degree of propagated crack length. This in situ monitoring is of significance to railway authorities in order to effectively and efficiently prioritize maintenance functions, which will improve safety and reliability of the rail network.

Keywords

Rail Surface Defect Squats and Studs Ultrasonic Mapping Field Monitoring Asset Management 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Grassie, S., “Studs: A Squat-Type Defect in Rails,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit 226(3): 243–256 (2012).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Molodova, M., Li, Z., Nunez, A., and Dollevoet, R., “Automatic Detection of Squats in Railway Infrastructure,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems PP(99): 1–11 (2014). DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2014.2307955.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mohan, S., Simson, S., Spiryagin, M., and Cole, C., “Early Detection of Rail Squats Using Eddy Current Inspection,” Proceedings of the International Heavy Haul Conference, Calgary, Canada, pp. 1–4; June 19–22, 2011.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ishida, M., “Rolling Contact Fatigue (RCF) Defect of Rails in Japanese Railways and Its Mitigation Strategies,” Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering 13(1): 67–74 (2013).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grassie, S., Fletcher, F.I., Hernandez, E.A.G., and Summers, P., “Squats and Squat-Type Defects in Rails: The Understanding to Date,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit 226(3): 235–242 (2012).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Griffin, D.W.P., Mirza, O., Kwok, K., and Kaewunruen, S., “Composite Slabs for Railway Construction and Maintenance: A Mechanistic Review,” The IES Journal Part A: Civil & Structural Engineering 7(4): 243–262 (2014). DOI: 10.1080/19373260.2014.947909.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ishida, M., “Statistical Analysis of Rail Shelling on Shinkansen,” Proceedings of 4th International Heavy Haul Conference, Institution of Engineers, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 205–209; September 1989.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wilson, A., Kerr, M.B., Marich, S., and Kaewunruen, S., “Wheel/Rail Conditions and Squat Development on Moderately Curved Tracks,” Proceedings of Conference of Railway Engineering, Brisbane, Australia; November 17–19, 2012Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Remennikov, A.M., and Kaewunruen, S., “A Review on Loading Conditions for Railway Track Structures Due to Train and Track Vertical Interaction,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring 15(2): 207–234 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaewunruen, S., and Remennikov, A.M., “Progressive Failure of Prestressed Concrete Sleepers under Multiple High-Intensity Impact Loads,” Engineering Structures 31(10): 2460–2473 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kaewunruen, S., and Remennikov, A.M., “Dynamic Properties of Railway Track and Its Components: Recent Finding and Future Research Directions,” Insight—Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring 52(1): 20–22 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kaewunruen, S., Remennikov, A.M., and Murray, M.H., “Introducing Limit States Design Concept to Concrete Sleepers: An Australian Experience,” Frontiers in Materials 1(8): 1–3 (2014).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaewunruen, S., “Monitoring Structural Deterioration of Railway Turnout Systems via Dynamic Wheel/Rail Interaction,” Case Studies in Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation 1(1): 19–24 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaewunruen, S., “Monitoring In-Service Performance of Fibre-Reinforced Foamed Urethane Material As Timber-Replacement Sleepers/Bearers in Railway Urban Turnout Systems,” Structural Monitoring and Maintenance 1(1): 131–157 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kerr, M.B., Wilson, A., and Marich, S., “The Epidemiology of Squats and Related Defects,” Proceedings of Conference on Railway Engineering, Perth, Australia; 2008Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kaewunruen, S., Use of Ultrasonic Testing for Mapping Rail Squat Cracks, Track Services RailCorp, Australia, Technical Report No. TR147, p. 8 (2009).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kaewunruen, S., and Ishida, M., “Field Monitoring of Rail Squats Using 3D Ultrasonic Mapping Technique,” Journal of the Canadian Institute for Non-Destructive Evaluation 35(6): 5–11 (2014).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peng, D., and Jones, R., “Modelling of the Lock-In Thermography Process through Finite Element Method for Estimating the Rail Squat Defects,” Engineering Failure Analysis 28: 275–288 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kaewunruen, S., Remennikov, A.M., Aikawa, A., and Sato, H., “Free Vibrations of Interspersed Railway Track Systems in Three-Dimensional Space,” Acoustics Australia 14(1): 20–26 (2014).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Carpinteri, A., Lacidogna, G., et al., “Mechanical and Electromagnetic Emissions Related to Stress-Induced Cracks,” Experimental Techniques 36: 53–64 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    La Rosa, G., Clienti, C., and Lo, S.F., “Fatigue Analysis by Acoustic Emission and Thermographic Techniques,” Procedia Engineering 74: 261–268 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kordatos, E.Z., Aggelis, D.G., and Matikas, T.E., “Monitoring Mechanical Damage in Structural Materials using Complimentary NDE Techniques Based on Thermography and Acoustic Emission,” Composites Part B: Engineering 43: 2676–2686 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kordatos, E.Z., Dassios, K.G., Aggelis, D.G., and Matikas, T.E., “Rapid Evaluation of the Fatigue Limit in Composites using Infrared Lock-in Thermography and Acoustic Emission,” Mechanics Research Communications 54: 14–20 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kaewunruen, S. (2015) “Identification and prioritization of rail squat defects in the field using rail magnetisation technology”, Proc. SPIE 9437, Structural Health Monitoring and Inspection of Advanced Materials, Aerospace, and Civil Infrastructure, 94371H, April 1, 2015.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kaewunruen, S., Ishida, M., Marich, S., “Dynamic wheel-rail interaction over rail squat defects”, Acoustics Australia 43(1): 97–107 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Birmingham Centre for Railway Research and Education, School of Civil EngineeringThe University of BirminghamBirminghamUK
  2. 2.Railway Engineering Department, Railway DivisionNippon Koei Co. Ltd.TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations