Advertisement

Experimental Techniques

, Volume 40, Issue 1, pp 111–119 | Cite as

Flexible Rod Design for Educational Wind Balance

  • G. Raush
  • R. Castilla
  • P. J. Gamez-Montero
  • J. Wojciechowski
  • E. Codina
Article
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

This article provides a technical description of a flexible hinge for wind tunnel rigs. For academic purposes, the device was integrated into several rod flexures to build a home-made external wind balance system. The cylindrical elastic element incorporates several notches, and the flexure linkage is able to transmit force in the main axial direction without hindering perpendicular movement. The flexural element described here is simple and easily manufactured, and can also be used with other types of wind balance. The flexure described in this article has similar functionality to those mentioned in the reference section, but has a more compact element. The project’s effectiveness was demonstrated in a series of experimental comparisons of forces and moments measured on a wing using the N.A.C.A. Clark-Y airfoil profile.

Keywords

Flexure Flexible Hinge Wind Tunnel Balance Clark-Y Airfoil Force and Moment Measurement 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hinojosa, F.Z. “Design of a New Wind Tunnel Facility at Industrial Engineering School in Badajoz (Spain),” Fifth International Conference on Advances in Fluid Mechanics, AFM V, 40, Lisbon, pp. 397–404 (2004).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Morris, M., and Post, S. “Force Balance Design for Educational Wind Tunnels,” Conference Proceedings of ASEE American Society for Engineering Education, Louisville, KY, USA (2010).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beck, T., Anderson, B., and Hosni, M. “A Simple Educational Wind Tunnel Setup for Visualization of Duct Flow Streamlines and Nozzle/Diffuser Boundary Layer Separation,” Report of Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Kansas State University (KSU) (2008).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buckley, M. “Wind Tunnel Tests on the 1/30th Scale Model of the 60 M Wind Turbine Generator,” Proceedings of Wind Energy Workshop, Cranfield, UK, pp. 96–108 (1980).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barlow, J.B., Rae, W.H., and Pope, A., Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing, Addison-Wiley, New York (1999).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Smith, A.L., Mee, D.J., Daniel, W.J., and Shimoda, T., Design, Modelling and Analysis of a Six Component Force Balance for Hypervelocity Wind Tunnel Testing, Computers and Structures 79(11): 1077–1088 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boyden, R.P., Johnson, W.G. Jr., and Ferris, A.T. “Aerodynamic Force Measurements With a Strain-Gage Balance in a Cryogenic Wind Tunnel,” NASA Technical Paper (1983).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhai, J., Ewald, B., and Hufnagel, K. “Investigation on the Interference of Internal Six-Component Wind Tunnel Balances with FEM, ICIASF Record,” International Congress on Instrumentation in Aerospace Simulation Facilities, pp. 16.1–16.10 (1995).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang, Y.-H., and Zhao, Z.-L., Development of the Interference Force Measurement Balance for Sub-Missile, Experiments and Measurements in Fluid Mechanics 19(1): 71–74 (2005).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fan, Z., Measurement of Aerodynamic Forces and Moments in Wind Tunnels, Encyclopedia of Aerospace Engineering 70: 811–823 (2010).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang, T., Qiu, J., and Liu, X., Definition Measurement Unit with Flexure Hinges for a Wind Tunnel Balance, IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation 24(1): 1457–1462 (2010).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Silverstein, A. “Scale Effect on Clark Y Airfoil Characteristics from N.A.C.A. Full-Scale Wind-Tunnel Tests,” N.A.C.A. Report 502 (1935).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gorlin, S.M., and Slezinger, I.I., Wind Tunnels and Their Instrumentation, Volume 599, Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Israel, Jerusalem (1966).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brush, D.O., and Almroth, B.O., Buckling of Bars, Plates, and Shells, McGraw-Hill, New York (1975).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Timoshenko, S., and Gere, J.M., Theory of Elastic Stability, 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York (1970).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ugural, A., and Fenster, S., Advanced Strength and Applied Elasticity, 3rd Edition, Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1995).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Young, W.C., Roark, R.J., and Budynas, R.G., Roark’s Formulas for Stress and Strain, McGraw-Hill’s Engineering Series, McGraw-Hill, New York (2002).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhu, Z., and Zhang, B., A Linear Piezomotor Integrated by a Monolithic Flexural Frame, Journal of Mechanical Design 119(3): 414–416 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Slocum, A.H., Precision Machine Design, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1992)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xie, W.-C., Differential Equations for Engineers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Castilla, R., Gamez-Montero, P.J., Wojciechowski, J., and Codina, E. Flexible Rod for Aerodynamic Platform Scales, Patent Number WO/2008/129107, UPC (2008).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Abbott, I.H., and Von Doenhoff, A.E., Theory of Wing Sections, Dover, New York (1959).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Selig, M.S., Donovan, J.F., and Fraser, D.B., Airfoils at Low Speeds, SoarTech Publications, Virginia Beach, VA (1989).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zimmerman, C.H. “Characteristics of Clark Y Airfoils of Small Aspect Ratios,” N.A.C.A. Report 431 (1933).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Marchman, J., and Werme, T. “Clark-Y Airfoil Performance at Low Reynolds Numbers,” AIAA 22nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, USA (1984).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Raush
    • 1
  • R. Castilla
    • 1
  • P. J. Gamez-Montero
    • 1
  • J. Wojciechowski
    • 1
  • E. Codina
    • 1
  1. 1.LABSON, Department of Fluid MechanicsUniversitat Politè cnica de CatalunyaTerrassaSpain

Personalised recommendations