Advertisement

Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology

, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp 227–236 | Cite as

I Don’t Sweat my Future: Future-Selves, Personality, and Skin Conductance

  • Amber R. Massey-AbernathyEmail author
  • Dallas N. Robinson
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 41 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

Future-selves (both positive and negative) have been shown to be related to self-esteem, efficacy, meaning, continuity, and social acceptance. Control beliefs (beliefs about whether actions can bring about desired outcomes) as well as locus of control (internal or external) may impact how individuals see their future and their perception of what can be done to create or change the future. Machiavellian personality traits are associated with external locus of control, while conscientiousness is associated with internal locus of control.

Methods

We measured galvanic skin response (GSR), a widely used measure of physiological arousal, in 84 study participants while they described possible future selves, one positive and one negative, and completed questionnaires about personality traits.

Results

Higher conscientiousness was associated with lower skin conductance when describing positive future selves, whereas higher scores on the Machiavellian Personality Assessment questionnaire were correlated with lower skin conductance when describing negative future selves.

Conclusion

Conscientious individuals are confident in their ability to control their future, thus explaining their lower arousal when describing positive future selves. Machiavellian individuals view the world more negatively but believe they can handle negative situations, thus explaining their lower arousal when describing negative future selves.

Keywords

Future-selves Conscientiousness Machiavellian Skin conductance 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Asendorpf, J. B., & van Aken, M. A. G. (2003). Personality-relationship transaction in adolescence: Core versus surface personality characteristics. Journal of Personality, 71(4), 629–666.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.7104005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bremner, J. D., & Vermetten, E. (2001). Stress and development: Behavioral and biological consequences. Development and Psychopathology, 13(3), 473–489.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579401003042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brouwer, A. M., Van Schaik, M. G., Korteling, J. H., van Erp, J. B., & Toet, A. (2015). Neuroticism, extraversion, conscientiousness and stress: Physiological correlates. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 6(2), 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buss, D. M. (2009). How can evolutionary psychology successfully explain personality and individual differences? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(4), 359–366.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01138.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carver, C. S., Harris, S. D., Lehman, J. M., Durel, L. A., Antoni, M. H., Spencer, S. M., & Pozo-Kaderman, C. (2000). How important is the perception of personal control? Studies of early stage breast cancer patients. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(2), 139–149.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200264001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng, C., Cheung, S. F., Chio, J. H., & Chan, M.-P. S. (2013). Cultural meaning of perceived control: A meta-analysis of locus of control and psychological symptoms across 18 cultural regions. Psychological Bulletin, 139(1), 152–188.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Costa, P. T., McCrae, R. R., & Dye, D. A. (1991). Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO personality inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(9), 887–898.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(91)90177-D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Comer, J. M. (1985). Machiavellianism and inner vs outer directedness: A study of sales managers. Psychological Reports, 56(1), 81–82.  https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1985.56.1.81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Denissen, J. J. A., & Penke, L. (2008). Motivational individual reaction norms underlying the five-factor model of personality: First steps towards a theory-based conceptual framework. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(5), 1285–1302.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dunkel, C. S. (2000). Possible selves as a mechanism for identity exploration. Journal of Adolescence, 23(5), 519–529.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.2000.0340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ernst, A., & D’Argembeau, A. (2017). Make it real: Belief in occurrence within episodic future thought. Memory & Cognition, 45(6), 1045–1061.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0714-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fehr, B., Samson, D., & Paulhus, D. L. (1992). The construct of Machiavellianism: Twenty years later. In C. D. Spielberger & J. N. Butcher (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment, Vol. 9. (pp. 77–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy.missouristate.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=1992-98768-003&site=ehost-live&scope=site. Retrieved March 29, 2019
  14. Ferguson, E. (1999). A facet and factor analysis of typical intellectual engagement (TIE): Associations with locus of control and the five factor model of personality. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 27(6), 545–562.  https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1999.27.6.545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fox, J., Bailenson, J. N., & Ricciardi, T. (2012). Physiological responses to virtual selves and virtual others. Journal of CyberTherapy & Rehabilitation, 5(1), 69–73.Google Scholar
  16. Frazier, P., Keenan, N., Anders, S., Perera, S., Shallcross, S., & Hintz, S. (2011). Perceived past, present, and future control and adjustment to stressful life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 749–765.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gable, M., & Dangello, F. (1994). Locus of control, Machiavellianism, and managerial job performance. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 128(5), 599–608.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1994.9914917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Geer, J. H. (1966). Fear and autonomic arousal. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 71(4), 253–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Geer, J. H., Davison, G. C., & Gatchel, R. I. (1970). Reduction of stress in humans through nonveridical perceived control of aversive stimulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16(4), 731–738.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84–96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26(1), 1–26.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoyle, R. H., & Sherrill, M. R. (2006). Future orientation in the self-system: Possible selves, self-regulation, and behavior. Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1673–1696.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00424.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jang, K. L., Livesley, W. J., Vernon, P. A., & Jackson, D. N. (1996). Heritability of personality disorder traits: A twin study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 94(6), 438–444.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1996.tb09887.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jonason, P. K., Lyons, M., Bethell, E. J., & Ross, R. (2013). Different routes to limited empathy in the sexes: Examining the links between the dark triad and empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(5), 572–576.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—Self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—With job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 80–92.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kappes, A., & Schikowski, A. (2013). Implicit theories of emotion shape regulation of negative affect. Cognition and Emotion, 27(5), 952–960.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2012.753415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Levenson, H., & Mahler, I. (1975). Attitudes toward others and components of internal-external locus of control. Psychological Reports, 36(1), 209–210.  https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1975.36.1.209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Massey-Abernathy, A., & Byrd-Craven, J. (2016). Seeing but not feeling: Machiavellian traits in relation to physiological empathetic responding and life experiences. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 2(3), 252–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McHoskey, J. W. (1999). Machiavellianism, intrinsic versus extrinsic goals, and social interest: A self-determination theory analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 23(4), 267–283.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021338809469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mealey, L. (1995). The sociobiology of sociopathy: An integrated evolutionary model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18(3), 523–599.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00039595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morrison, K. A. (1997). Personality correlates of the five-factor model for a sample of business owners/managers: Associations with scores on self-monitoring, type a behavior, locus of control, and subjective well-being. Psychological Reports, 80(1), 255–272.  https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.80.1.255-272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mudrack, P. E. (1990). Machiavellianism and locus of control: A meta-analytic review. The Journal of Social Psychology, 130(1), 125–126.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1990.9922944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nettle, D. (2006). The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. American Psychologist, 61(6), 622–631.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.6.622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Newport, B. (2018). Machiavellianism: Assessing the Relationship between Cortisol Response, Personality, and Life Experiences. 2018 NCUR.Google Scholar
  36. Ng, T. W. H., Sorensen, K. L., & Eby, L. T. (2006). Locus of control at work: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(8), 1057–1087.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Packard, B. W.-L., & Conway, P. F. (2006). Methodological choice and its consequences for possible selves research. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 6(3), 251–271.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532706xid0603_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K., & Strauss, K. (2010). Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. Journal of Management, 36(4), 827–856.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310363732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Perrin, S., & Testé, B. (2010). Impact of the locus of causality and internal control on the social utility of causal explanations. Swiss Journal of Psychology / Schweizerische Zeitschrift Für Psychologie / Revue Suisse de Psychologie, 69(3).  https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prinzie, P., van der Sluis, C. M., de Haan, A. D., & Deković, M. (2010). The mediational role of parenting on the longitudinal relation between child personality and externalizing behavior. Journal of Personality, 78(4), 1301–1323. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2010-14054-008&site=ehost-live&scope=site. Retrieved March 29, 2019Google Scholar
  41. Prociuk, T. J., & Breen, L. J. (1976). Machiavellianism and locus of control. The Journal of Social Psychology, 98(1), 141–142.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1976.9923379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ramanaiah, N. V., Byravan, A., & Detwiler, F. R. J. (1994). Revised NEO personality inventory profiles of Machiavellian and non-Machiavellian people. Psychological Reports, 75(2), 937–938.  https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1994.75.2.937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Roberts, B. W., Chernyshenko, O. S., Stark, S., & Goldberg, L. R. (2005). The structure of conscientiousness: An empirical investigation based on seven major personality questionnaires. Personnel Psychology, 58(1), 103–139.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00301.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1–28.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rovenpor, D. R., & Isbell, L. M. (2018). Do emotional control beliefs lead people to approach positive or negative situations? Two competing effects of control beliefs on emotional situation selection. Emotion, 18(3), 313–331.  https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schmitt, D. P. (2005). In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology Fundamentals of human mating strategies (pp. 258–291). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
  47. Sirois, F. M., Davis, C. G., & Morgan, M. S. (2006). “Learning to live with what you Can’t rise above”: Control beliefs, symptom control, and adjustment to tinnitus. Health Psychology, 25(1), 119–123.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.25.1.119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Skinner, E. A. (1996). A guide to constructs of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 549–570.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Solar, D., & Bruehl, D. (1971). Machiavellianism and locus of control: Two conceptions of interpersonal power. Psychological Reports, 29(3, Pt. 2), 1079–1082.  https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1971.29.3f.1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Taylor, S. E., Lichtman, R. R., & Wood, J. V. (1984). Attributions, beliefs about control, and adjustment to breast cancer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3), 489–502.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Testé, B. (2017). Control beliefs and dehumanization: Targets with an internal locus of control are perceived as being more human than external targets. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 76(2), 81–86.  https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vignoles, V. L., Manzi, C., Regalia, C., Jemmolo, S., & Scabini, E. (2008). Identity motives underlying desired and feared possible future selves. Journal of Personality, 76(5), 1165–1200.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00518.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Voss, P., Kornadt, A. E., & Rothermund, K. (2017). Getting what you expect? Future self-views predict the valence of life events. Developmental Psychology, 53(3), 567–580.  https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000285.supp (Supplemental.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Watson, D., & Baumal, E. (1967). Effects of locus of control and expectation of future control upon present performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6(2), 212–215.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyMissouri State UniversitySpringfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations