I Don’t Sweat my Future: Future-Selves, Personality, and Skin Conductance
- 41 Downloads
Future-selves (both positive and negative) have been shown to be related to self-esteem, efficacy, meaning, continuity, and social acceptance. Control beliefs (beliefs about whether actions can bring about desired outcomes) as well as locus of control (internal or external) may impact how individuals see their future and their perception of what can be done to create or change the future. Machiavellian personality traits are associated with external locus of control, while conscientiousness is associated with internal locus of control.
We measured galvanic skin response (GSR), a widely used measure of physiological arousal, in 84 study participants while they described possible future selves, one positive and one negative, and completed questionnaires about personality traits.
Higher conscientiousness was associated with lower skin conductance when describing positive future selves, whereas higher scores on the Machiavellian Personality Assessment questionnaire were correlated with lower skin conductance when describing negative future selves.
Conscientious individuals are confident in their ability to control their future, thus explaining their lower arousal when describing positive future selves. Machiavellian individuals view the world more negatively but believe they can handle negative situations, thus explaining their lower arousal when describing negative future selves.
KeywordsFuture-selves Conscientiousness Machiavellian Skin conductance
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Carver, C. S., Harris, S. D., Lehman, J. M., Durel, L. A., Antoni, M. H., Spencer, S. M., & Pozo-Kaderman, C. (2000). How important is the perception of personal control? Studies of early stage breast cancer patients. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(2), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200264001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Denissen, J. J. A., & Penke, L. (2008). Motivational individual reaction norms underlying the five-factor model of personality: First steps towards a theory-based conceptual framework. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(5), 1285–1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fehr, B., Samson, D., & Paulhus, D. L. (1992). The construct of Machiavellianism: Twenty years later. In C. D. Spielberger & J. N. Butcher (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment, Vol. 9. (pp. 77–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy.missouristate.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=1992-98768-003&site=ehost-live&scope=site. Retrieved March 29, 2019
- Ferguson, E. (1999). A facet and factor analysis of typical intellectual engagement (TIE): Associations with locus of control and the five factor model of personality. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 27(6), 545–562. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.19220.127.116.115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fox, J., Bailenson, J. N., & Ricciardi, T. (2012). Physiological responses to virtual selves and virtual others. Journal of CyberTherapy & Rehabilitation, 5(1), 69–73.Google Scholar
- Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jang, K. L., Livesley, W. J., Vernon, P. A., & Jackson, D. N. (1996). Heritability of personality disorder traits: A twin study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 94(6), 438–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1996.tb09887.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—Self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—With job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Morrison, K. A. (1997). Personality correlates of the five-factor model for a sample of business owners/managers: Associations with scores on self-monitoring, type a behavior, locus of control, and subjective well-being. Psychological Reports, 80(1), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.80.1.255-272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Newport, B. (2018). Machiavellianism: Assessing the Relationship between Cortisol Response, Personality, and Life Experiences. 2018 NCUR.Google Scholar
- Perrin, S., & Testé, B. (2010). Impact of the locus of causality and internal control on the social utility of causal explanations. Swiss Journal of Psychology / Schweizerische Zeitschrift Für Psychologie / Revue Suisse de Psychologie, 69(3). https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Prinzie, P., van der Sluis, C. M., de Haan, A. D., & Deković, M. (2010). The mediational role of parenting on the longitudinal relation between child personality and externalizing behavior. Journal of Personality, 78(4), 1301–1323. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2010-14054-008&site=ehost-live&scope=site. Retrieved March 29, 2019Google Scholar
- Schmitt, D. P. (2005). In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology Fundamentals of human mating strategies (pp. 258–291). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar