Advertisement

Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 48–102 | Cite as

An Updated Theoretical Framework for Human Sexual Selection: from Ecology, Genetics, and Life History to Extended Phenotypes

  • Severi LuotoEmail author
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Objectives

Sexual selection typically centers on bodily and psychological traits. Non-bodily traits ranging from housing and vehicles through art to social media can, however, influence sexual selection even in absence of the phenotype proper. The theoretical framework of human sexual selection is updated in this article by unifying four theoretical approaches and conceptualizing non-bodily traits as extended phenotypic traits.

Methods

Existing research is synthesized with extended phenotype theory, life history theory, and behavioral ecology. To test population-level hypotheses arising from the review, ecological and demographic data on 122 countries are analyzed with multiple linear regression modelling.

Results

A four-factor model of intelligence, adolescent fertility, population density, and atmospheric cold demands predicts 64% of global variation in economic complexity in 1995 and 72% of the variation in 2016.

Conclusions

The evolutionary pathways of extended phenotypes frequently undergo a categorical broadening from providing functional benefits to carrying signalling value. Extended phenotypes require investments in skills and bioenergetic resources, but they can improve survival in high latitudes, facilitate the extraction of resources from the environment, and substantially influence sexual selection outcomes. Bioenergetic investments in extended phenotypes create individual- and population-level tradeoffs with competing life history processes, exemplified here as a global tradeoff between adolescent fertility and economic complexity. The merits of the present model include a more systematic classification of sexual traits, a clearer articulation of their evolutionary-developmental hierarchy, and an analysis of ecological, genetic, and psychological mechanisms that modulate the flow of energy into extended phenotypes and cultural innovations.

Keywords

Economic complexity Evolutionary-developmental psychology Extended phenotype Human behavioral ecology Innovation Intelligence Life history theory Non-bodily ornament Sexual selection Theory unification 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Otto A. Malm foundation, The University of Auckland Doctoral Scholarship, and the Emil Aaltonen Young Researcher Grant. The author is grateful for Brian Boyd’s and Quentin Atkinson’s meticulous criticism, Markus J. Rantala’s guidance, and for Oliver Sheehan, Ania Grant, and Patrick Neilands for their valuable comments on earlier drafts. The author wishes to thank the University of Auckland Language, Culture and Cognition group for several thoughtful discussions on the topic. The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Glossary

Allele

each of two or more alternative forms of a gene found in the same genetic locus.

Atmospheric cold demands

a climatic variable that is coded as the sum of the absolute downward deviations from 22 °C for the average lowest temperature in the coldest month, the average highest temperature in the coldest month, the average lowest temperature in the hottest month, and the average highest temperature in the hottest month (Van de Vliert 2013).

Behavioral ecology

studies the evolutionary basis for behavior shaped by ecological pressures such as climate, habitat characteristics, and conspecific interactions.

Cognitive buffer hypothesis

suggests that the primary adaptive function of a large brain is to buffer individuals against environmental challenges by facilitating the construction of behavioral responses (Sol 2009).

Conspecifics

are members of the same species; heterospecifics are members of a different species.

Cues

can provide information to other organisms, but they were not evolutionarily selected for the specific purpose of conveying information. Many signals have nevertheless evolved from cues through the evolutionary process of signaller precursor route: signals can evolve from behaviors or structures that originally were informative aspects of the signaller and then became specialized over evolutionary time to convey information more effectively (Laidre and Johnstone 2013). It can be challenging to establish what is a cue and what is a signal (Sugiyama 2015) especially in contemporary human sexual selection on extended phenotypic traits. This is why the current work (mostly) refrains from discussing extended phenotypic traits as signals and instead refers to them simply as cues or traits.

Ecological inheritance

refers to ecological legacies passed on to future generations that are generated by niche construction activities of past generations.

Economic Complexity Index (ECI)

a holistic measure of the knowledge, industrial composition, and production characteristics of a country.

Exaptation

a feature that enhances fitness in a way that differs from its “original” evolutionarily selected role; i.e. it is a trait that currently has a positive fitness effect without being an adaptation specifically for that effect (Buss et al. 1998; Gould and Vrba 1982).

Extended phenotypes

are a part of the phenotype expressed beyond the body. In simplified terms, and not taking into account the polygenic architecture underlying the creation or manipulation of extended phenotypes, they result from the effects of an allele upon the world that have a bearing on that allele’s survival or proliferation (Dawkins 2004). This includes any feature of the abiotic or biotic environment that is the result of manipulative action or construction behavior of an individual, but excludes any result of such manipulative behavior that does not affect the organism’s fitness negatively or positively (Dawkins 1982; Schaedelin and Taborsky 2009). This definition therefore includes the dam that a beaver builds, but not the footprints it makes when building it (Dawkins 1982, p. 315). Both result from the action of an organism upon the world, but only the dam has a fitness implication to the beaver. Extended phenotypes can be divided into inanimate and animate ones.

Extended phenotypic plasticity

refers to the process of extended phenotypes adapting to the demands of the environment, interacting with it, and gaining feedback from it, thereby creating phenotype–environment interactions and extended phenotype–environment interactions that flow through generations (Blamires 2010; Lehmann 2008).

Functional traits

are the morphological, physiological, phenological, and behavioral characteristics of an organism that have an influence on performance or fitness (Meunier et al. 2017).

Kin selection

refers to any variation in indirect fitness among different phenotypes caused by their ability to influence the reproductive success and survival of genetically similar individuals.

Natural selection

is the sum total of viability selection, sexual selection, and kin selection (Cornwallis and Uller 2010).

Niche construction

is a theoretical framework that studies the ways in which organisms choose and modify components of their local environments.

Phenotype

is the composite of an organism’s observable physical or biochemical features (as determined by genetic makeup and environmental influences) (Bolondi et al. 2017). Cognitive traits such as intelligence are classified as phenotypic traits in this article. Thus, phenotypic traits can be further divided into somatic (physical) and cognitive (psychological) traits (e.g. Miller and Todd 1998). Much literature exists on behavioral phenotypes; for reasons of theoretical accuracy and empirical distinction, however, behavioral traits are here distinguished from phenotypic traits. Likewise, though extended phenotypic traits could be seen as a subcategory of phenotypic traits, they are treated as a separate category because they do not fulfil the orthodox definition of a phenotype.

Phenotypic plasticity

refers to the ability of a single genotype to produce multiple phenotypes when exposed to different environments.

Secondary adaptations

(sometimes called post-adaptations) are adaptive changes that an exaptation undergoes to become better suited to its evolutionarily novel function.

Secondary sexual signals

are sexually selected traits that give an organism an advantage over its rivals in mate choice without being directly involved in reproduction. Examples in humans include enlarged breasts and muscles.

Sexual selection

is defined as any variation in direct fitness among different phenotypes caused by their ability to gain sexual partners, produce fertilized eggs, and generate offspring.

Signals

are traits that were evolutionarily selected for because they conveyed information about the signaller, affecting the behavior of other organisms and ultimately impacting the fitness of both the signaller and the recipient (Laidre and Johnstone 2013).

Trait-based ecology

provides a functional approach to understanding ecological interactions by focusing on the expression of functional traits under distinct environmental conditions (Meunier et al. 2017).

Viability selection

refers to any variation in direct fitness among different phenotypes caused by their ability to survive.

References

  1. Andrews, T. M., Lukaszewski, A. W., Simmons, Z. L., & Bleske-Rechek, A. (2017). Cue-based estimates of reproductive value explain women's body attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(4), 461–467.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.04.002.Google Scholar
  2. Antfolk, J., Salo, B., Alanko, K., Bergen, E., Corander, J., Sandnabba, N. K., & Santtila, P. (2015). Women's and men's sexual preferences and activities with respect to the partner's age: Evidence for female choice. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(1), 73–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.09.003.Google Scholar
  3. Archer, I. W. (2011a). Economy. In A. F. Kinney (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Shakespeare (pp. 165–181). Oxford: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566105.013.0010.
  4. Archer, J. (2011b). Pet keeping: A case study in maladaptive behavior. In C. Salmon & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of evolutionary family psychology (pp. 281–296). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ardiel, E. L., & Rankin, C. H. (2010). An elegant mind: Learning and memory in Caenorhabditis elegans. Learning & Memory, 17(4), 191–201.  https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.960510.Google Scholar
  6. Arslan, R. C., Schilling, K. M., Gerlach, T. M., & Penke, L. (2018). Using 26,000 diary entries to show ovulatory changes in sexual desire and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000208.
  7. Ash, J., & Gallup, G. G. (2007). Paleoclimatic variation and brain expansion during human evolution. Human Nature, 18(2), 109–124.Google Scholar
  8. Austen, J. (2007/1813). Pride and Prejudice. In Ebrary, Chandni Chowk, Delhi: Global Media.Google Scholar
  9. Azam, S. (2017). A cross-country empirical test of cognitive abilities and innovation nexus. International Journal of Educational Development, 53, 128–136.Google Scholar
  10. Bailey, N. W. (2012). Evolutionary models of extended phenotypes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27(10), 561–569.Google Scholar
  11. Bailey, D. H., & Geary, D. C. (2009). Hominid brain evolution. Human Nature, 20(1), 67–79.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-008-9054-0.Google Scholar
  12. Ball, H. C., Londraville, R. L., Prokop, J. W., George, J. C., Suydam, R. S., Vinyard, C., Thewissen, J. G. M., & Duff, R. J. (2017). Beyond thermoregulation: Metabolic function of cetacean blubber in migrating bowhead and beluga whales. Journal of Comparative Physiology B, 187(1), 235–252.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s0036.Google Scholar
  13. Barbot, B., Tan, M., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2013). The genetics of creativity: The generative and receptive sides of the creativity equation. In O. Vartanian, A. S. Bristol, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The neuroscience of creativity (pp. 71–93). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Barelds, D. P., & Barelds-Dijkstra, P. (2007). Love at first sight or friends first? Ties among partner personality trait similarity, relationship onset, relationship quality, and love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24(4), 479–496.Google Scholar
  15. Barton, R. A., & Venditti, C. (2014). Rapid evolution of the cerebellum in humans and other great apes. Current Biology, 24(20), 2440–2444.Google Scholar
  16. Bateson, P., & Gluckman, P. (2011). Plasticity, robustness, development and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Baumard, N. (2018). Psychological origins of the industrial revolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–47.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1800211X.
  18. Beck, S. R., Chappell, J., Apperly, I. A., & Cutting, N. (2012). Tool innovation may be a critical limiting step for the establishment of a rich tool-using culture: A perspective from child development. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(4), 220–221.Google Scholar
  19. Bereczkei, T., Voros, S., Gal, A., & Bernath, L. (1997). Resources, attractiveness, family commitment; reproductive decisions in human mate choice. Ethology, 103(8), 681–699.Google Scholar
  20. Black, C. J., Figueredo, A. J., & Jacobs, W. J. (2017). Substance, history, and politics: An examination of the conceptual underpinnings of alternative approaches to the life history narrative. Evolutionary Psychology, 15(1), 1474704916670402.Google Scholar
  21. Blake, K. R., Dixson, B. J., O'Dean, S. M., & Denson, T. F. (2017). No compelling positive association between ovarian hormones and wearing red clothing when using multinomial analyses. Hormones and Behavior, 90, 129–135.Google Scholar
  22. Blake, K. R., Bastian, B., Denson, T. F., Grosjean, P., & Brooks, R. C. (2018). Income inequality not gender inequality positively covaries with female sexualization on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(35), 8722–8727.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717959115.Google Scholar
  23. Blamires, S. J. (2010). Plasticity in extended phenotypes: Orb web architectural responses to variations in prey parameters. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 213(18), 3207–3212.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.045583.Google Scholar
  24. Blamires, S. J., Hasemore, M., Martens, P. J., & Kasumovic, M. M. (2017). Diet-induced co-variation between architectural and physicochemical plasticity in an extended phenotype. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 220(Pt 5), 876–884.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.150029.Google Scholar
  25. Blamires, S. J., Martens, P. J., & Kasumovic, M. M. (2018). Fitness consequences of plasticity in an extended phenotype. Journal of Experimental Biology, 221(4), jeb167288.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.167288.Google Scholar
  26. Bolondi, A., Caldarelli, F., Di Felice, F., Durano, D., Germani, G., Michetti, L., et al. (2017). What is a gene? A two sided view. Evolutionary Biology, 44(1), 1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-016-9392-5.Google Scholar
  27. Botchkavar, E., Marshell, I. H., Rocque, M., & Posick, C. (2015). The importance of parenting in the development of self-control in boys and girls: Results from a multinational study of youth. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 133–141.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.02.001.Google Scholar
  28. Boutwell, B. B., Barnes, J. C., Beaver, K. M., Haynes, R. D., Nedelec, J. L., & Gibson, C. L. (2015). A unified crime theory: The evolutionary taxonomy. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 25, 343–353.Google Scholar
  29. Boyd, B. (2009). On the origin of stories: Evolution, cognition, and fiction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Bribiescas, R. G., Ellison, P. T., & Gray, P. B. (2012). Male life history, reproductive effort, and the evolution of the genus homo. Current Anthropology, 53(S6), S424–S435.  https://doi.org/10.1086/667538.Google Scholar
  31. Briedis, M., Hahn, S., & Adamík, P. (2017). Cold spell en route delays spring arrival and decreases apparent survival in a long-distance migratory songbird. BMC Ecology, 17(1), 11.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-017-0121-4.Google Scholar
  32. Bukowski, A., & Rudnicki, S. (2018). Not Only Individualism: The Effects of Long-Term Orientation and Other Cultural Variables on National Innovation Success. Cross-Cultural Research, 1-44, 1069397118785546.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397118785546.
  33. Burger, J. R., Weinberger, V. P., & Marquet, P. A. (2017). Extra-metabolic energy use and the rise in human hyper-density. Scientific Reports, 7.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43869.
  34. Burke, D., Sulikowski, D., Stephen, I., & Brooks, R. (2017). Inconsistent with the data: Support for the CLASH model depends on the wrong kind of latitude. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e80.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16001242,e80.Google Scholar
  35. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(01), 1–14.Google Scholar
  36. Buss, D. M., Abbott, M., Angleitner, A., Asherian, A., Biaggio, A., Blanco-Villasenor, A., ... Deraad, B. (1990). International preferences in selecting mates: A study of 37 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21(1), 5–47.Google Scholar
  37. Buss, D. M., Haselton, M. G., Shackelford, T. K., Bleske, A. L., & Wakefield, J. C. (1998). Adaptations, exaptations, and spandrels. American Psychologist, 53(5), 533–548.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.5.533.Google Scholar
  38. Buston, P. M., & Emlen, S. T. (2003). Cognitive processes underlying human mate choice: The relationship between self-perception and mate preference in western society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(15), 8805–8810.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1533220100.Google Scholar
  39. Cain, K. E., & Ketterson, E. D. (2012). Competitive females are successful females; phenotype, mechanism, and selection in a common songbird. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 66, 241–252.Google Scholar
  40. Camera, D. M., Smiles, W. J., & Hawley, J. A. (2016). Exercise-induced skeletal muscle signaling pathways and human athletic performance. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 98, 131–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.02.007.Google Scholar
  41. Candolin, U. (2003). The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biological Reviews, 78(4), 575–595.Google Scholar
  42. Carleton, W. C., Campbell, D., & Collard, M. (2017). Increasing temperature exacerbated classic Maya conflict over the long term. Quaternary Science Reviews, 163, 209–218.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.02.022.Google Scholar
  43. Carneiro, R. L. (1970). A theory of the origin of the state: Traditional theories of state origins are considered and rejected in favor of a new ecological hypothesis. Science, 169(3947), 733–738.Google Scholar
  44. Casey, B., Jones, R. M., & Hare, T. A. (2008). The adolescent brain. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124(1), 111–126.Google Scholar
  45. Cedeño Laurent, J. G., Williams, A., Oulhote, Y., Zanobetti, A., Allen, J. G., & Spengler, D. A. (2018). Reduced cognitive function during a heat wave among residents of non-air-conditioned buildings: An observational study of young adults in the summer of 2016. PLoS Medicine, 15(7), e1002605.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002605.Google Scholar
  46. Chappell, J., Cutting, N., Apperly, I. A., & Beck, S. R. (2013). The development of tool manufacture in humans: What helps young children make innovative tools? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 368(1630), 20120409.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0409.Google Scholar
  47. Charney, E. (2012). Behavior genetics and postgenomics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(5), 331–358.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11002226.Google Scholar
  48. Christin, A. (2012). Gender and highbrow cultural participation in the United States. Poetics, 40(5), 423–443.Google Scholar
  49. Chu, W. (2009). A functional approach to Paleolithic open-air habitation structures. World Archaeology, 41(3), 348–362.Google Scholar
  50. Clegg, H., Nettle, D., & Miell, D. (2011). Status and mating success amongst visual artists. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(310).  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00310.
  51. Climate Change Knowledge Portal (2018). Historical climate data. Online Database Available at: http://sdwebx.worldbank.org/climateportal/index.cfm Retrieved on September 3, 2018.
  52. Cloud, J. M., & Taylor, M. H. (2018). The effect of mate value discrepancy on hypothetical engagement ring purchases. Evolutionary Psychological Science.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-018-0156-6.
  53. Clutton-Brock, T. (2007). Sexual selection in males and females. Science, 318(5858), 1882–1885.Google Scholar
  54. Clutton-Brock, T. (2017). Reproductive competition and sexual selection. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 372(1729), 20160310.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0310.Google Scholar
  55. Collard, M., Kemery, M., & Banks, S. (2005). Causes of toolkit variation among hunter-gatherers: A test of four competing hypotheses. Canadian Journal of Archaeology/Journal Canadien D'Archéologie, 29(1), 1–19. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41103514.
  56. Confer, J. C., Perilloux, C., & Buss, D. M. (2010). More than just a pretty face: men's priority shifts toward bodily attractiveness in short-term versus long-term mating contexts. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(5), 348–353.Google Scholar
  57. Conroy-Beam, D. (2018). Euclidean mate value and power of choice on the mating market. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(2), 252–264.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217739262.Google Scholar
  58. Conroy-Beam, D., & Buss, D. M. (2016). Mate preferences. In T. K. Shackelford, & V. A. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science (pp. 1–11) Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1-1.
  59. Conroy-Beam, D., Buss, D. M., Pham, M. N., & Shackelford, T. K. (2015). How sexually dimorphic are human mate preferences? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(8), 1082–1093.Google Scholar
  60. Cornwallis, C. K., & Uller, T. (2010). Towards an evolutionary ecology of sexual traits. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25(3), 145–152.Google Scholar
  61. Creanza, N., & Feldman, M. W. (2016). Worldwide genetic and cultural change in human evolution. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, 41, 85–92.Google Scholar
  62. Creanza, N., Kolodny, O., & Feldman, M. W. (2017). Cultural evolutionary theory: How culture evolves and why it matters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(30), 7782–7789.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1620732114.Google Scholar
  63. Crocchiola, D. (2014). Art as an indicator of male fitness: Does prenatal testosterone influence artistic ability? Evolutionary Psychology, 12(3), 521–533.  https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491401200303.Google Scholar
  64. Csajbók, Z., & Berkics, M. (2017). Factor, factor, on the whole, who's the best fitting of all?: Factors of mate preferences in a large sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 114, 92–102.Google Scholar
  65. d’Errico, F., Doyon, L., Zhang, S., Baumann, M., Lázničková-Galetová, M., Gao, X., Chen, F., & Zhang, Y. (2018). The origin and evolution of sewing technologies in Eurasia and North America. Journal of Human Evolution, 125, 71–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.10.004.Google Scholar
  66. Davies, G., Tenesa, A., Payton, A., Yang, J., Harris, S. E., Liewald, D., ... Luciano, M. (2011). Genome-wide association studies establish that human intelligence is highly heritable and polygenic. Molecular Psychiatry, 16(10), 996–1005.Google Scholar
  67. Dawkins, R. (1982). The extended phenotype: The long reach of the gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Dawkins, R. (2004). Extended phenotype–but not too extended. A reply to Laland, turner and Jablonka. Biology and Philosophy, 19(3), 377–396.Google Scholar
  69. De Dreu, C. K., & van Dijk, M. A. (2018). Climatic shocks associate with innovation in science and technology. PLoS One, 13(1), e0190122.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190122.Google Scholar
  70. de Manzano, Ö., & Ullén, F. (2018). Genetic and environmental influences on the phenotypic associations between intelligence, personality, and creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Intelligence, 69, 123–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2018.05.004.Google Scholar
  71. Del Giudice, M., Gangestad, S. W., & Kaplan, H. S. (2015). Life history theory and evolutionary psychology. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (2nd ed., pp. 88–114). New York: Wiley Online Library.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119125563.evpsych102.
  72. Delson, E. (2000). Encyclopedia of human evolution and prehistory (2nd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  73. Dennett, D. C. (1975). Why the law of effect will not go away. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 5(2), 169–188.Google Scholar
  74. Dickerson, K. L., Ainge, J. A., & Seed, A. M. (2018). The role of Association in pre-schoolers’ solutions to “spoon tests” of future planning. Current Biology, 28(14), 2309–2313.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.05.052.Google Scholar
  75. Dickins, T. E., & Barton, R. A. (2013). Reciprocal causation and the proximate–ultimate distinction. Biology and Philosophy, 28(5), 747–756.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-012-9345-z.Google Scholar
  76. Dobbs, R., Remes, J., Manyika, J., Roxburgh, C., Smit, S., & Schaer, F. (2012). Urban world: Cities and the rise of the consuming class. McKinsey global institute. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/global-themes/urbanization/urban-world-cities-and-the-rise-of-the-consuming-class. Retrieved on January 1, 2018.
  77. Donath, J. S. (1998). Identity and deception in the virtual community. In M. A. Smith & P. Kollack (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 29–59). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  78. Dunn, M. J., & Hill, A. (2014). Manipulated luxury-apartment ownership enhances opposite-sex attraction in females but not males. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 12(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  79. Dunn, M. J., & Searle, R. (2010). Effect of manipulated prestige-car ownership on both sex attractiveness ratings. British Journal of Psychology, 101(1), 69–80.Google Scholar
  80. Durante, K. M., Li, N. P., & Haselton, M. G. (2008). Changes in women's choice of dress across the ovulatory cycle: Naturalistic and laboratory task-based evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(11), 1451–1460.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208323103.Google Scholar
  81. Dutta, S., & Lanvin, B. (2013). The global innovation index 2013. The local dynamics of innovation. Ithaca: Cornell University, World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (Retrieved from www.globalinnovationindex.org/content.aspx?page=gii-fullreport-2013).
  82. Eisenbruch, A. B., Simmons, Z. L., & Roney, J. R. (2015). Lady in red: Hormonal predictors of women's clothing choices. Psychological Science, 26(8), 1332–1338.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615586403.Google Scholar
  83. Elliot, A. J., Greitemeyer, T., & Pazda, A. D. (2013). Women's use of red clothing as a sexual signal in intersexual interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 599–602.Google Scholar
  84. Ellis, B. J., Bianchi, J., Griskevicius, V., & Frankenhuis, W. E. (2017). Beyond risk and protective factors: An adaptation-based approach to resilience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(4), 561–587.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617693054.Google Scholar
  85. Ellison, P. T. (2017). Endocrinology, energetics, and human life history: A synthetic model. Hormones and Behavior, 91, 97–106.Google Scholar
  86. Escasa, M., Gray, P. B., & Patton, J. Q. (2010). Male traits associated with attractiveness in Conambo, Ecuador. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(3), 193–200.Google Scholar
  87. Essock-Vitale, S. M. (1984). The reproductive success of wealthy Americans. Ethology and Sociobiology, 5(1), 45–49.Google Scholar
  88. European Commission (2018). Distance calculator. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/tools/distance_en.htm. Retrieved on January 1, 2018.
  89. Figueredo, A. J., Vásquez, G., Brumbach, B. H., & Schneider, S. M. (2004). The heritability of life history strategy: The k-factor, covitality, and personality. Social Biology, 51(3–4), 121–143.Google Scholar
  90. Figueredo, A. J., Vásquez, G., Brumbach, B. H., Sefcek, J. A., Kirsner, B. R., & Jacobs, W. J. (2005). The K-factor: Individual differences in life history strategy. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1349–1360.Google Scholar
  91. Figueredo, A. J., Vásquez, G., Brumbach, B. H., Schneider, S. M., Sefcek, J. A., Tal, I. R., ... Jacobs, W. J. (2006). Consilience and life history theory: From genes to brain to reproductive strategy. Developmental Review, 26(2), 243–275.Google Scholar
  92. Fincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R. (2012). Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: The cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(02), 61–79.Google Scholar
  93. Fincher, C. L., Thornhill, R., Murray, D. R., & Schaller, M. (2008). Pathogen prevalence predicts human cross-cultural variability in individualism/collectivism. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 275(1640), 1279–1285.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0094.Google Scholar
  94. Fisher, R. A. (1930). The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Flatt, T., & Heyland, A. (Eds.). (2011). Mechanisms of life history evolution: The genetics and physiology of life history traits and trade-offs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  96. Flinn, M. V., Geary, D. C., & Ward, C. V. (2005). Ecological dominance, social competition, and coalitionary arms races: Why humans evolved extraordinary intelligence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(1), 10–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.08.005.Google Scholar
  97. Fogarty, L. (2018). Cultural complexity and evolution in fluctuating environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 373(1743), 20170063.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0063.Google Scholar
  98. Fogarty, L., & Creanza, N. (2017). The niche construction of cultural complexity: Interactions between innovations, population size and the environment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 372(1735), 20160428.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0428.Google Scholar
  99. Fogarty, L., Creanza, N., & Feldman, M. W. (2015). Cultural evolutionary perspectives on creativity and human innovation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30(12), 736–754.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.10.004.Google Scholar
  100. Fristoe, T. S., Iwaniuk, A. N., & Botero, C. A. (2017). Big brains stabilize populations and facilitate colonization of variable habitats in birds. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 1, 1706–1715.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0316-2.Google Scholar
  101. Gangestad, S. W. (2008). Biological adaptations and human behavior. In C. Crawford & D. Krebs (Eds.), Foundations of evolutionary psychology (pp. 153–172). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  102. Gao, Z., Gao, S., Xu, L., Zheng, X., Ma, X., Luo, L., & Kendrick, K. M. (2017a). Women prefer men who use metaphorical language when paying compliments in a romantic context. Scientific Reports, 7, 40871.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40871.Google Scholar
  103. Gao, Z., Yang, Q., Ma, X., Becker, B., Li, K., Zhou, F., & Kendrick, K. M. (2017b). Men who compliment a Woman's appearance using metaphorical language: Associations with creativity, masculinity, intelligence and attractiveness. Frontiers in Psychology, 8.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02185.
  104. Geary, D. C. (1995). Reflections of evolution and culture in children's cognition: Implications for mathematical development and instruction. American Psychologist, 50(1), 24–37.Google Scholar
  105. Geffre, A. C., Liu, R., Manfredini, F., Beani, L., Kathirithamby, J., Grozinger, C. M., & Toth, A. L. (2017). Transcriptomics of an extended phenotype: Parasite manipulation of wasp social behaviour shifts expression of caste-related genes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 284(1852), 20170029.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0029.Google Scholar
  106. Gettler, L. T., Ryan, C. P., Eisenberg, D. T., Rzhetskaya, M., Hayes, M. G., Feranil, A. B., . . . Kuzawa, C. W. (2017). The role of testosterone in coordinating male life history strategies: The moderating effects of the androgen receptor CAG repeat polymorphism. Hormones and Behavior, 87, 164–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.10.012.Google Scholar
  107. Gienapp, P., Teplitsky, C., Alho, J. S., Mills, J. A., & Merilä, J. (2008). Climate change and evolution: Disentangling environmental and genetic responses. Molecular Ecology, 17(1), 167–178.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03413.x.Google Scholar
  108. Gilligan, I. (2007). Neanderthal extinction and modern human behaviour: The role of climate change and clothing. World Archaeology, 39(4), 499–514.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240701680492.Google Scholar
  109. Gilligan, I. (2010). The prehistoric development of clothing: Archaeological implications of a thermal model. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 17(1), 15–80.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-009-9076-x.Google Scholar
  110. González, A. L., Dézerald, O., Marquet, P. A., Romero, G. Q., & Srivastava, D. S. (2017). The multidimensional stoichiometric niche. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 110.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2017.00110.Google Scholar
  111. Gonzalez-Forero, M., Faulwasser, T., & Lehmann, L. (2017). A model for brain life history evolution. PLoS Computational Biology, 13(3), e1005380.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005380.Google Scholar
  112. Gould, S. J. (1991). Exaptation: A crucial tool for an evolutionary psychology. Journal of Social Issues, 47(3), 43–65.Google Scholar
  113. Gould, S. J., & Vrba, E. S. (1982). Exaptation—A missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology, 8(01), 4–15.Google Scholar
  114. Grammer, K., Renninger, L., & Fischer, B. (2004). Disco clothing, female sexual motivation, and relationship status: Is she dressed to impress? Journal of Sex Research, 41(1), 66–74.Google Scholar
  115. Gray, P. B., Volsche, S. L., Garcia, J. R., & Fisher, H. E. (2015). The roles of pet dogs and cats in human courtship and dating. Anthrozoös, 28(4), 673–683.Google Scholar
  116. Green, R. (2017). Hugh Hefner, the international academy of sex research, and its founding president. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 2211–2212.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1098-y.Google Scholar
  117. Gregor, T. (1985). Anxious pleasures: The sexual lives of an Amazonian people. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  118. Groyecka, A., Pisanski, K., Sorokowska, A., Havlíček, J., Karwowski, M., Puts, D., ... & Sorokowski, P. (2017). Attractiveness is multimodal: Beauty is also in the nose and ear of the beholder. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 778.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00778.
  119. Guadagno, R. E., Okdie, B. M., & Kruse, S. A. (2012). Dating deception: Gender, online dating, and exaggerated self-presentation. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 642–647.Google Scholar
  120. Guéguen, N. (2015). High heels increase women’s attractiveness. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(8), 2227–2235.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0422-z.Google Scholar
  121. Guéguen, N., & Ciccotti, S. (2008). Domestic dogs as facilitators in social interaction: An evaluation of helping and courtship behaviors. Anthrozoös, 21(4), 339–349.Google Scholar
  122. Guéguen, N., & Lamy, L. (2012). Men’s social status and attractiveness. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 71, 157–160.  https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000083.Google Scholar
  123. Guéguen, N., Meineri, S., & Fischer-Lokou, J. (2014). Men’s music ability and attractiveness to women in a real-life courtship context. Psychology of Music, 42(4), 545–549.Google Scholar
  124. Gurven, M. (2018). Broadening horizons: Sample diversity and socioecological theory are essential to the future of psychological science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(45), 11420–11427.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1720433115.Google Scholar
  125. Gurven, M., Winking, J., Kaplan, H., Von Rueden, C., & McAllister, L. (2009). A bioeconomic approach to marriage and the sexual division of labor. Human Nature, 20(2), 151–183.Google Scholar
  126. Harrison, M. A., & Shortall, J. C. (2011). Women and men in love: Who really feels it and says it first? The Journal of Social Psychology, 151(6), 727–736.Google Scholar
  127. Hartmann, D., Guevara, M. R., Jara-Figueroa, C., Aristarán, M., & Hidalgo, C. A. (2017). Linking economic complexity, institutions, and Income Inequality. World Development, 93, 75–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.020.Google Scholar
  128. Haselton, M. G., Mortezaie, M., Pillsworth, E. G., Bleske-Rechek, A., & Frederick, D. A. (2007). Ovulatory shifts in human female ornamentation: Near ovulation, women dress to impress. Hormones and Behavior, 51(1), 40–45.Google Scholar
  129. Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C. A., Bustos, S., Coscia, M., Simoes, A., & Yildirim, M. A. (2014). The atlas of economic complexity: Mapping paths to prosperity. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  130. Havlíček, J., Cobey, K. D., Barrett, L., Klapilová, K., & Roberts, S. C. (2015). The spandrels of Santa Barbara? A new perspective on the peri-ovulation paradigm. Behavioral Ecology, 26(5), 1249–1260.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv064.Google Scholar
  131. Head, M. L., Fox, R. J., & Barber, I. (2017). Environmental change mediates mate choice for an extended phenotype, but not for mate quality. Evolution, 71(1), 135–144.  https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13091.Google Scholar
  132. Hill, W. D., Hagenaars, S. P., Marioni, R. E., Harris, S. E., Liewald, D. C., Davies, G., et al. (2016). Molecular genetic contributions to social deprivation and household income in UK biobank. Current Biology, 26(22), 3083–3089.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.09.035.Google Scholar
  133. Hill, W. D., Arslan, R. C., Xia, C., Luciano, M., Amador, C., Navarro, P., ... & Deary, I. J. (2018a). Genomic analysis of family data reveals additional genetic effects on intelligence and personality. Molecular Psychiatry, 1.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-017-0005-1.
  134. Hill, W. D., Marioni, R. E., Maghzian, O., Ritchie, S. J., Hagenaars, S. P., McIntosh, A. M., Gale, C. R., Davies, G., & Deary, I. J. (2018b). A combined analysis of genetically correlated traits identifies 187 loci and a role for neurogenesis and myelination in intelligence. Molecular Psychiatry.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-017-0001-5.
  135. Hoberg, E. P., & Brooks, D. R. (2015). Evolution in action: Climate change, biodiversity dynamics and emerging infectious disease. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 370(1665), 20130553.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0553.Google Scholar
  136. Hoffecker, J. F., & Hoffecker, I. T. (2017a). The structural and functional complexity of hunter-gatherer technology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-017-9332-4.
  137. Hoffecker, J. F., & Hoffecker, I. T. (2017b). Technological complexity and the global dispersal of modern humans. Evolutionary Anthropology, 26(6), 285–299.  https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.21553.Google Scholar
  138. Holmberg, A. R. (1969). Nomads of the long Bow: The Siriono of eastern Bolivia. Garden City: Natural History Press.Google Scholar
  139. Honegger, K., & de Bivort, B. (2018). Stochasticity, individuality and behavior. Current Biology, 28, R1–R16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.058.Google Scholar
  140. Hoover, K., Grove, M., Gardner, M., Hughes, D. P., McNeil, J., & Slavicek, J. (2011). A gene for an extended phenotype. Science, 333(6048), 1401.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1209199.Google Scholar
  141. Hughes, S. M., & Aung, T. (2017). Modern-day female preferences for resources and provisioning by long-term mates. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 11(3), 242–261.  https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000084.Google Scholar
  142. Hulteen, R. M., Morgan, P. J., Barnett, L. M., Stodden, D. F., & Lubans, D. R. (2018). Development of foundational movement skills: A conceptual model for physical activity across the lifespan. Sports Medicine, 48(7), 1533–1540.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0892-6.
  143. Hunter, P. (2009). Extended phenotype redux. EMBO Reports, 10(3), 212–215.  https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2009.18.Google Scholar
  144. Hunter, P. (2018). The revival of the extended phenotype: After more than 30 years, Dawkins’ extended phenotype hypothesis is enriching evolutionary biology and inspiring potential applications. EMBO Reports, 19, e46477.  https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201846477.Google Scholar
  145. Hurst, J. E., & Kavanagh, P. S. (2017). Life history strategies and psychopathology: The faster the life strategies, the more symptoms of psychopathology. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(1), 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.06.001.Google Scholar
  146. IJzerman, H., Čolić, M. V., Hennecke, M., Hong, Y., Hu, C. P., Joy-Gaba, J., ... & Schubert, T. (2017). Does distance from the equator predict self-control? Lessons from the human penguin project. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16000406.
  147. Immonen, E., Hämäläinen, A., Schuett, W., & Tarka, M. (2018). Evolution of sex-speciic pace-of-life syndromes: Genetic architecture and physiological mechanisms. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 72(3), 60.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-018-2462-1. Google Scholar
  148. Iriki, A., & Taoka, M. (2012). Triadic (ecological, neural, cognitive) niche construction: A scenario of human brain evolution extrapolating tool use and language from the control of reaching actions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 367(1585), 10–23.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0190.Google Scholar
  149. Israel, E., & Strassberg, D. S. (2009). Viewing time as an objective measure of sexual interest in heterosexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(4), 551–558.Google Scholar
  150. Jasienska, G., Bribiescas, R. G., Furberg, A. S., Helle, S., & Núñez-de la Mora, A. (2017). Human reproduction and health: An evolutionary perspective. The Lancet, 390(10093), 510–520.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30573-1.Google Scholar
  151. Jonason, P. K., Garcia, J. R., Webster, G. D., Li, N. P., & Fisher, H. E. (2015). Relationship dealbreakers: Traits people avoid in potential mates. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(12), 1697–1711.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215609064.Google Scholar
  152. Jones, D., Brace, C. L., Jankowiak, W., Laland, K. N., Musselman, L. E., Langlois, J. H., Roggman, L. A., Pérusse, D., Schweder, B., & Symons, D. (1995). Sexual selection, physical attractiveness, and facial neoteny: Cross-cultural evidence and implications. Current Anthropology, 36(5), 723–748.Google Scholar
  153. Jordan, P. (2015). Technology as human social tradition: Cultural transmission among hunter-gatherers. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  154. Jordan, L. A., Maguire, S. M., Hofmann, H. A., & Kohda, M. (2016). The social and ecological costs of an ‘over-extended’ phenotype. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 283, 20152359.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2359.Google Scholar
  155. Kanazawa, S. (2000). Scientific discoveries as cultural displays: A further test of Miller's courtship model. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21(5), 317–321.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00051-9.Google Scholar
  156. Kanazawa, S. (2008). Temperature and evolutionary novelty as forces behind the evolution of general intelligence. Intelligence, 36(2), 99–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2007.04.001.Google Scholar
  157. Kaufman, S. B., Kozbelt, A., Silvia, P., Kaufman, J. C., Ramesh, S., & Feist, G. J. (2014). Who finds bill gates sexy? Creative mate preferences as a function of cognitive ability, personality, and creative achievement. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 50(4), 294–307.Google Scholar
  158. Kecko, S., Mihailova, A., Kangassalo, K., Elferts, D., Krama, T., Krams, R., Luoto, S., Rantala, M. J., & Krams, I. A. (2017). Sex-specific compensatory growth in the larvae of the greater wax moth Galleria mellonella. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 30(10), 1910–1918.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13150.Google Scholar
  159. Keeley, L. H. (1988). Hunter-gatherer economic complexity and “population pressure”: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 7(4), 373–411.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4165(88)90003-7.Google Scholar
  160. Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Neuberg, S. L., & Schaller, M. (2010). Renovating the pyramid of needs: Contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 292–314.Google Scholar
  161. Kline, M. A., & Boyd, R. (2010). Population size predicts technological complexity in Oceania. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 277(1693), 2559–2564.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0452.Google Scholar
  162. Kokko, H., & Rankin, D. J. (2006). Lonely hearts or sex in the city? Density-dependent effects in mating systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 361(1466), 319–334.Google Scholar
  163. Kordsmeyer, T. L., Hunt, J., Puts, D. A., Ostner, J., & Penke, L. (2018). The relative importance of intra-and intersexual selection on human male sexually dimorphic traits. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(4), 424–436.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.03.008.Google Scholar
  164. Kowalczyk, R., & Zalewski, A. (2011). Adaptation to cold and predation—Shelter use by invasive raccoon dogs Nyctereutes procyonoides in Białowieża primeval Forest (Poland). European Journal of Wildlife Research, 57(1), 133–142.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-010-0406-9.Google Scholar
  165. Kramer, R. S., & Mulgrew, J. (2018). Displaying red and black on a first date: A field study using the “first dates” television series. Evolutionary Psychology, 16(2), 1474704918769417.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704918769417.Google Scholar
  166. Krams, I., Inwood, S. E., Trakimas, G., Krams, R., Burghardt, G. M., Butler, D. M., ... & Krama, T. (2016). Short-term exposure to predation affects body elemental composition, climbing speed and survival ability in Drosophila melanogaster. PeerJ, 4, e2314.  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2314.
  167. Krams, I., Kecko, S., Inashkina, I., Trakimas, G., Krams, R., Elferts, D., ... & Contreras-Garduño, J. (2017a). Food quality affects the expression of antimicrobial peptide genes upon simulated parasite attack in the larvae of greater wax moth. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 165(2–3), 129–137.  https://doi.org/10.1111/eea.12629.
  168. Krams, I., Kecko, S., Jõers, P., Trakimas, G., Elferts, D., Krams, R., et al. (2017b). Microbiome symbionts and diet diversity incur costs on the immune system of insect larvae. Journal of Experimental Biology, 220(22), 4204–4212.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.169227.Google Scholar
  169. Krams, I., Rumvolt, K., Saks, L., Krams, R., Elferts, D., Vrublevska, J., et al. (2017c). Reproduction compromises adaptive immunity in a cyprinid fish. Ecological Research, 32, 559–566.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-017-1467-y.Google Scholar
  170. Krams, I., Luoto, S., Rubika, A., Krama, T., Elferts, D., Kecko, S., Skrinda, I., Moore, F. R., Krams, R., & Rantala, M. J. (2018). A head start for life history development? Family income causes associations between body height and immune response in men. American Journal of Physical Anthropology.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23754.
  171. Kruger, D., & Kruger, J. S. (2018). What do economically costly signals signal?: A life history framework for interpreting conspicuous consumption. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 4(4), 420–427.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-018-0151-y.Google Scholar
  172. Kuzawa, C. W. (2007). Developmental origins of life history: Growth, productivity, and reproduction. American Journal of Human Biology, 19(5), 654–661.Google Scholar
  173. Laidre, M. E., & Johnstone, R. A. (2013). Animal signals. Current Biology, 23(18), R829–R833.Google Scholar
  174. Laland, K. N., & O’Brien, M. J. (2011). Cultural niche construction: An introduction. Biological Theory, 6(3), 191–202.Google Scholar
  175. Laland, K. N., Sterelny, K., Odling-Smee, J., Hoppitt, W., & Uller, T. (2011). Cause and effect in biology revisited: Is Mayr’s proximate-ultimate dichotomy still useful? Science, 334(6062), 1512–1516.Google Scholar
  176. Laland, K., Odling-Smee, J., & Endler, J. (2017). Niche construction, sources of selection and trait coevolution. Interface Focus, 7(5), 20160147.Google Scholar
  177. Lane, D. A. (2016). Innovation cascades: Artefacts, organization and attributions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 371, 20150194.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0194.Google Scholar
  178. Lange, B. P. (2011). Male proneness to verbal display production. Acta Linguistica, 5, 97–104.Google Scholar
  179. Lange, B. P., & Euler, H. A. (2014). Writers have groupies, too: High quality literature production and mating success. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 8(1), 20–30.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0097246.Google Scholar
  180. Lassek, W. D., & Gaulin, S. J. (2008). Waist-hip ratio and cognitive ability: Is gluteofemoral fat a privileged store of neurodevelopmental resources? Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(1), 26–34.Google Scholar
  181. Lawrence, S. (2006). Jimi Hendrix: The man, the magic, the truth. New York: Harper Entertainment.Google Scholar
  182. Lee, J. J., Wedow, R., Okbay, A., Kong, E., Maghzian, O., Zacher, M., ... & Fontana, M. A. (2018). Gene discovery and polygenic prediction from a genome-wide association study of educational attainment in 1.1 million individuals. Nature Genetics, 50(8), 1112–1121.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0147-3.
  183. Lehmann, L. (2008). The adaptive dynamics of niche constructing traits in spatially subdivided populations: Evolving posthumous extended phenotypes. Evolution, 62(3), 549–566.Google Scholar
  184. Levine, R. V., & Norenzayan, A. (1999). The pace of life in 31 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30(2), 178–205.Google Scholar
  185. Levis, N. A., Isdaner, A. J., & Pfennig, D. W. (2018). Morphological novelty emerges from pre-existing phenotypic plasticity. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2(8), 1289–1297.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0601-8.Google Scholar
  186. Lewis, D. M., Al-Shawaf, L., Conroy-Beam, D., Asao, K., & Buss, D. M. (2017a). Evolutionary psychology: A how-to guide. American Psychologist, 72(4), 353–373.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040409.Google Scholar
  187. Lewis, D. M., Russell, E. M., Al-Shawaf, L., Ta, V., Senveli, Z., Ickes, W., & Buss, D. M. (2017b). Why women wear high heels: Evolution, lumbar curvature, and attractiveness. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1875.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01875.Google Scholar
  188. Li, N. P., Balley, J., Kenrick, D. T., & Linsenmeier, J. A. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 947–955.Google Scholar
  189. Liu, J., Duan, C., & Lummaa, V. (2017). Parent-offspring conflict over family size in current China. American Journal of Human Biology, 29(3), e22946.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.22946.
  190. Lu, H. J., Zhu, X. Q., & Chang, L. (2015). Good genes, good providers, and good fathers: Economic development involved in how women select a mate. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 9(4), 215–228.Google Scholar
  191. Lu, H. J., Wong, K., & Chang, L. (2017). The association between life history strategy and mate preference in men. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 157–163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.047.Google Scholar
  192. Luhring, T. M., DeLong, J. P., & Semlitsch, R. D. (2017). Stoichiometry and life-history interact to determine the magnitude of cross-ecosystem element and biomass fluxes. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8(814).  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00814.
  193. Luoto, S., & Rantala, M. J. (2017). Specificity of women’s sexual response: Proximate mechanisms and ultimate causes. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 1195–1198.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0961-1.Google Scholar
  194. Luoto, S., & Spriggs, M. J. (2018). Commentary: The neural basis of human female mate copying: An empathy-based social learning process. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 397.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00397.Google Scholar
  195. Luoto, S., Krams, I., & Rantala, M. J. (2019). A life history approach to the female sexual orientation spectrum: Evolution, development, causal mechanisms, and health. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1–36. [Target Article].  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1261-0.
  196. Lynn, R. (2012). IQs predict differences in the technological development of nations from 1000 BC through 2000 AD. Intelligence, 40(5), 439–444.Google Scholar
  197. Lynn, R. & Vanhanen, T. (2002). IQ and the wealth of nations. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.Google Scholar
  198. MacDonald, K. (2018). Fire-free hominin strategies for coping with cool winter temperatures in North-Western Europe from before 800,000 to circa 400,000 years ago. PaleoAnthropology, 7–26.  https://doi.org/10.4207/PA.2018.ART109.
  199. Mace, R. (1998). The coevolution of human fertility and wealth inheritance strategies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 353(1367), 389–397.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1998.0217.Google Scholar
  200. Madison, G., Holmquist, J., & Vestin, M. (2018). Musical improvisation skill in a prospective partner is associated with mate value and preferences, consistent with sexual selection and parental investment theory: Implications for the origin of music. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(1), 120–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.10.005.Google Scholar
  201. Maex, M., Treer, D., de Greve, H., Proost, P., van Bocxlaer, I., & Bossuyt, F. (2018). Exaptation as a mechanism for functional reinforcement of an animal pheromone system. Current Biology, 28(18), 2955–2960.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.074.Google Scholar
  202. Maloney, W. F., & Valencia Caicedo, F. (2016). The persistence of (subnational) fortune. The Economic Journal, 126(598), 2363–2401.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12276.Google Scholar
  203. Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., & DeWall, C. N. (2007). Adaptive attentional attunement: Evidence for mating-related perceptual bias. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(1), 28–36.Google Scholar
  204. Maner, J. K., Dittmann, A., Meltzer, A. L., & McNulty, J. K. (2017). Implications of life-history strategies for obesity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(32), 8517–8522.Google Scholar
  205. Marcinkowska, U. M., Dixson, B. J., Kozlov, M. V., Prasai, K., & Rantala, M. J. (2017). Men’s preferences for female facial femininity decline with age. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 72(1), 180–186.Google Scholar
  206. Marquet, P. A., Allen, A. P., Brown, J. H., Dunne, J. A., Enquist, B. J., Gillooly, J. F., ... & O’Dwyer, J. (2014). On theory in ecology. BioScience, 64(8), 701–710.Google Scholar
  207. Meisenberg, G., & Woodley, M. A. (2013). Global behavioral variation: A test of differential-K. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(3), 273–278.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.016.Google Scholar
  208. Meunier, C. L., Boersma, M., El-Sabaawi, R., Halvorson, H. M., Herstoff, E. M., Van de Waal, D. B., ... & Litchman, E. (2017). From elements to function: Toward unifying ecological stoichiometry and trait-based ecology. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 5, 18.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2017.00018.
  209. Miller, G. F. (1999). Sexual selection for cultural displays. In R. Dunbar, C. Knight, & C. Power (Eds.), The evolution of culture (pp. 71–91). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  210. Miller, G. F. (2000). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  211. Miller, G. F. (2001). Aesthetic fitness: How sexual selection shaped artistic virtuosity as a fitness indicator and aesthetic preferences as mate choice criteria. Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts, 2(1), 20–25.Google Scholar
  212. Miller, G. F. (2010). Spent: Sex, evolution, and consumer behavior. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  213. Miller, G. F., & Todd, P. M. (1998). Mate choice turns cognitive. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(5), 190–198.Google Scholar
  214. Minkov, M., & Bond, M. H. (2015). Genetic polymorphisms predict national differences in life history strategy and time orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 204–215.Google Scholar
  215. Minkov, M., Welzel, C., & Bond, M. H. (2016). The impact of genes, geography, and educational opportunities on national cognitive achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 236–243.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.03.004.Google Scholar
  216. Moczek, A. P., Sultan, S., Foster, S., Ledón-Rettig, C., Dworkin, I., Nijhout, H. F., ... & Pfennig, D. W. (2011). The role of developmental plasticity in evolutionary innovation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 278(1719), 2705–2713.Google Scholar
  217. Morris, P. H., White, J., Morrison, E. R., & Fisher, K. (2013). High heels as supernormal stimuli: How wearing high heels affects judgements of female attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(3), 176–181.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.11.006.Google Scholar
  218. Mosing, M. A., Verweij, K. J., Madison, G., Pedersen, N. L., Zietsch, B. P., & Ullén, F. (2015). Did sexual selection shape human music? Testing predictions from the sexual selection hypothesis of music evolution using a large genetically informative sample of over 10,000 twins. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(5), 359–366.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.02.004.Google Scholar
  219. Motta-Mena, N. V., & Puts, D. A. (2017). Endocrinology of human female sexuality, mating, and reproductive behavior. Hormones and Behavior, 91, 19–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.11.012.Google Scholar
  220. Munro, K. R., Flood, N. J., McKellar, A. E., & Reudink, M. W. (2014). Female mate preference varies with age and environmental conditions. Behaviour, 151(14), 2059–2081.  https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-00003231.Google Scholar
  221. Murphy, V. E., Smith, R., Giles, W. B., & Clifton, V. L. (2006). Endocrine regulation of human fetal growth: The role of the mother, placenta, and fetus. Endocrine Reviews, 27(2), 141–169.Google Scholar
  222. Murray, C. (2003). Human accomplishment: The pursuit of excellence in the arts and sciences, 800 BC to 1950. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  223. Muthukrishna, M., & Henrich, J. (2016). Innovation in the collective brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 371(1690), 20150192.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0192.Google Scholar
  224. Navarrete, A. F., Reader, S. M., Street, S. E., Whalen, A., & Laland, K. N. (2016). The coevolution of innovation and technical intelligence in primates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 371(1690), 20150186.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0186.Google Scholar
  225. Nave, G., Nadler, A., Dubois, D., Zava, D., Camerer, C., & Plassmann, H. (2018). Single-dose testosterone administration increases men’s preference for status goods. Nature Communications, 9(1), 2433.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04923-0.Google Scholar
  226. Nelissen, R. M., & Meijers, M. H. (2011). Social benefits of luxury brands as costly signals of wealth and status. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(5), 343–355.Google Scholar
  227. Nielsen, M. (2012). Childhood and advances in human tool use. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(4), 232–233.Google Scholar
  228. Obschonka, M., Stuetzer, M., Rentfrow, P. J., Shaw-Taylor, L., Satchell, M., Silbereisen, R. K., ... & Gosling, S. D. (2018). In the shadow of coal: How large-scale industries contributed to present-day regional differences in personality and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(5), 903–927.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000175.
  229. Oda, R. (2001). Sexually dimorphic mate preference in Japan. Human Nature, 12(3), 191–206.Google Scholar
  230. Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N., & Feldman, M. W. (2003). Niche construction: The neglected process in evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  231. Oishi, S. (2010). The psychology of residential mobility: Implications for the self, social relationships, and well-being. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(1), 5–21.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691609356781.Google Scholar
  232. Okbay, A., Beauchamp, J. P., Fontana, M. A., Lee, J. J., Pers, T. H., Rietveld, C. A., ... & Oskarsson, S. (2016). Genome-wide association study identifies 74 loci associated with educational attainment. Nature, 533(7604), 539–542.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17671.
  233. Orosz, G., Zimbardo, P. G., Boőthe, B., & Tóth-Király, I. (2017). The paradoxical effect of climate on time perspective considering resource accumulation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e92.Google Scholar
  234. Pepper, G. V., & Nettle, D. (2017a). The behavioural constellation of deprivation: Causes and consequences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–72.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1600234X, e314.
  235. Pepper, G. V., & Nettle, D. (2017b). Strengths, altered investment, risk management, and other elaborations on the behavioural constellation of deprivation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e346.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1700190X.Google Scholar
  236. Pianka, E. R. (1970). On r-and K-selection. The American Naturalist, 104(940), 592–597.Google Scholar
  237. Pigliucci, M. (2005). Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: Where are we going now? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(9), 481–486.Google Scholar
  238. Pine, A., Shiner, T., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2010). Dopamine, time, and impulsivity in humans. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30(26), 8888–8896.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6028-09.2010.Google Scholar
  239. Pollet, T. V., Tybur, J. M., Frankenhuis, W. E., & Rickard, I. J. (2014). What can cross-cultural correlations teach us about human nature? Human Nature, 25(3), 410–429.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-014-9206-3.Google Scholar
  240. Pollock, D. (2002). Partible paternity and multiple maternity among the Kulina. In S. Beckerman & P. Valentine (Eds.), Cultures of multiple fathers: The theory of practice of partible paternity in lowland South America (pp. 42–61). Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
  241. Puts, D. (2016). Human sexual selection. Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 28–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.011.Google Scholar
  242. Putt, S. S., Wijeakumar, S., Franciscus, R. G., & Spencer, J. P. (2017). The functional brain networks that underlie early stone age tool manufacture. Nature Human Behaviour, 1.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0102.
  243. Rantala, M. J., Luoto, S., Krams, I., & Karlsson, H. (2018). Depression subtyping based on evolutionary psychiatry: Proximate mechanisms and ultimate functions. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 69, 603–617.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2017.10.012.Google Scholar
  244. Reichman, O. J., & Smith, S. C. (1990). Burrows and burrowing behavior by mammals. Current Mammalogy, 2, 197–244.Google Scholar
  245. Reinisch, J. M., Mortensen, E. L., & Sanders, S. A. (2017). Prenatal exposure to progesterone affects sexual orientation in humans. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(5), 1239–1249.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0923-z.Google Scholar
  246. Remigereau, C., Roy, A., Costini, O., Osiurak, F., Jarry, C., & Le Gall, D. (2016). Involvement of technical reasoning more than functional knowledge in development of tool use in childhood. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1625.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01625.Google Scholar
  247. Reuter, M., Roth, S., Holve, K., & Hennig, J. (2006). Identification of first candidate genes for creativity: A pilot study. Brain Research, 1069(1), 190–197.Google Scholar
  248. Rindermann, H., & Becker, D. (2018). Flynn-effect and economic growth: Do national increases in intelligence lead to increases in GDP? Intelligence, 69, 87–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2018.05.001.Google Scholar
  249. Rindermann, H., Kodila-Tedika, O., & Christainsen, G. (2015). Cognitive capital, good governance, and the wealth of nations. Intelligence, 51, 98–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.06.002.Google Scholar
  250. Roberts, S. C., Havlíček, J., Flegr, J., Hruskova, M., Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., ... Petrie, M. (2004). Female facial attractiveness increases during the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 271 Suppl 5, S270–S272.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2004.0174.
  251. Robinson, M. R., Kleinman, A., Graff, M., Vinkhuyzen, A. A., Couper, D., Miller, M. B., ... Nolte, I. M. (2017). Genetic evidence of assortative mating in humans. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 0016.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0016.
  252. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71–S102.Google Scholar
  253. Rosenfeld, M. J., & Thomas, R. J. (2012). Searching for a mate: The rise of the internet as a social intermediary. American Sociological Review, 77(4), 523–547.Google Scholar
  254. Roth, T. C., & Pravosudov, V. V. (2009). Hippocampal volumes and neuron numbers increase along a gradient of environmental harshness: A large-scale comparison. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 276(1656), 401–405.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1184.Google Scholar
  255. Rubalcaba, J. G., Polo, V., Maia, R., Rubenstein, D. R., & Veiga, J. P. (2016). Sexual and natural selection in the evolution of extended phenotypes: The use of green nesting material in starlings. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 29(8), 1585–1592.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12893.Google Scholar
  256. Said-Mohamed, R., Pettifor, J. M., & Norris, S. A. (2018). Life history theory hypotheses on child growth: Potential implications for short and long-term child growth, development and health. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 165(1), 4–19.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23340.Google Scholar
  257. Saltz, J. B., & Foley, B. R. (2011). Natural genetic variation in social niche construction: Social effects of aggression drive disruptive sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster. The American Naturalist, 177(5), 645–654.Google Scholar
  258. Sanz-Barbero, B., Linares, C., Vives-Cases, C., González, J. L., López-Ossorio, J. J., & Díaz, J. (2018). Heat wave and the risk of intimate partner violence. Science of the Total Environment, 644, 413–419.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.368.Google Scholar
  259. Schaedelin, F. C., & Taborsky, M. (2009). Extended phenotypes as signals. Biological Reviews, 84(2), 293–313.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00075.x.Google Scholar
  260. Schaller, M. (2015). The behavioral immune system. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (2nd ed., pp. 1–17). Hoboken: Wiley Online Library.Google Scholar
  261. Schinasi, L. H., & Hamra, G. B. (2017). A time series analysis of associations between daily temperature and crime events in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Journal of Urban Health, 94(6), 892–900.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-017-0181-y.Google Scholar
  262. Schlomer, G. L., Del Giudice, M., & Ellis, B. J. (2011). Parent–offspring conflict theory: An evolutionary framework for understanding conflict within human families. Psychological Review, 118(3), 496–521.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024043.Google Scholar
  263. Schwarz, S., & Hassebrauck, M. (2012). Sex and age differences in mate-selection preferences. Human Nature, 23(4), 447–466.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-012-9152-x.Google Scholar
  264. Sell, A., Lukazsweski, A. W., & Townsley, M. (2017). Cues of upper body strength account for most of the variance in men's bodily attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 284(1869), 20171819.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1819.Google Scholar
  265. Shackelford, T. K., Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Universal dimensions of human mate preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(2), 447–458.Google Scholar
  266. Shapiro, G. K., Tatar, O., Sutton, A., Fisher, W., Naz, A., Perez, S., & Rosberger, Z. (2017). Correlates of tinder use and risky sexual behaviors in young adults. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 20(12), 727–734.Google Scholar
  267. Shuler, G. A., & McCord, D. M. (2010). Determinants of male attractiveness: “Hotness” ratings as a function of perceived resources. American Journal of Psychological Research, 6(1), 10–23.Google Scholar
  268. Sih, A., & Del Giudice, M. (2012). Linking behavioural syndromes and cognition: A behavioural ecology perspective. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 367(1603), 2762–2772.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0216.Google Scholar
  269. Singh, D., & Bronstad, P. M. (2001). Female body odour is a potential cue to ovulation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 268(1469), 797–801.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1589.Google Scholar
  270. Snell-Rood, E., Cothran, R., Espeset, A., Jeyasingh, P., Hobbie, S., & Morehouse, N. I. (2015). Life-history evolution in the anthropocene: Effects of increasing nutrients on traits and trade-offs. Evolutionary Applications, 8(7), 635–649.  https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12272.Google Scholar
  271. Sng, O., Neuberg, S. L., Varnum, M. E. W., & Kenrick, D. T. (2017). The crowded life is a slow life: Population density and life history strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(5), 736–754.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000086.Google Scholar
  272. Sng, O., Neuberg, S. L., Varnum, M. E., & Kenrick, D. T. (2018). The behavioral ecology of cultural psychological variation. Psychological Review, 125(5), 714–743.  https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000104.
  273. Sniekers, S., Stringer, S., Watanabe, K., Jansen, P. R., Coleman, J. R., Krapohl, E., ... & Amin, N. (2017). Genome-wide association meta-analysis of 78,308 individuals identifies new loci and genes influencing human intelligence. Nature Genetics, 49, 1107–1112.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3869.
  274. Socrata. (2017). Country list ISO 3166 codes latitude longitude. Internet database. Available at: https://opendata.socrata.com/dataset/Country-List-ISO-3166-Codes-Latitude-Longitude/mnkm-8ram/data. Retrieved on December 6, 2017.
  275. Sol, D. (2009). Revisiting the cognitive buffer hypothesis for the evolution of large brains. Biology Letters, 5(1), 130–133.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0621.Google Scholar
  276. Sol, D., Sayol, F., Ducatez, S., & Lefebvre, L. (2016). The life-history basis of behavioural innovations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 371(1690), 20150187.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0187.Google Scholar
  277. Somveille, M., Rodrigues, A. S. L., & Manica, A. (2018). Energy efficiency drives the global seasonal distribution of birds. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2, 962–969.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0556-9.Google Scholar
  278. Souza, A. L., Conroy-Beam, D., & Buss, D. M. (2016). Mate preferences in Brazil: Evolved desires and cultural evolution over three decades. Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 45–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.053.Google Scholar
  279. Speakman, J. R. (2018). Response to ‘fat is not just an energy store’. Journal of Experimental Biology, 221(12), jeb184499.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.184499.Google Scholar
  280. Stanyon, R., & Bigoni, F. (2014). Sexual selection and the evolution of behavior, morphology, neuroanatomy and genes in humans and other primates. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 46, 579–590.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.10.001.Google Scholar
  281. Stearns, S. C., Allal, N., & Mace, R. (2008). Life history theory and human development. In C. Crawford & D. Krebs (Eds.), Foundations of evolutionary psychology (pp. 47–69). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  282. Steegmann, A. T., Cerny, F. J., & Holliday, T. W. (2002). Neandertal cold adaptation: Physiological and energetic factors. American Journal of Human Biology, 14(5), 566–583.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.10070.Google Scholar
  283. Steinberg, L., Graham, S., O’Brien, L., Woolard, J., Cauffman, E., & Banich, M. (2009). Age differences in future orientation and delay discounting. Child Development, 80(1), 28–44.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01244.x.Google Scholar
  284. Steinberg, L., Icenogle, G., Shulman, E. P., Breiner, K., Chein, J., Bacchini, D., ... & Fanti, K. A. (2017). Around the world, adolescence is a time of heightened sensation seeking and immature self-regulation. Developmental Science. 00; e12532.  https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12532.
  285. Sternberg, R. J. (2017). An alternative interpretation of climate data: Intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e96.Google Scholar
  286. Stodden, D. F., Goodway, J. D., Langendorfer, S. J., Roberton, M. A., Rudisill, M. E., Garcia, C., & Garcia, L. E. (2008). A developmental perspective on the role of motor skill competence in physical activity: An emergent relationship. Quest, 60(2), 290–306.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2008.10483582.Google Scholar
  287. Stotz, K. (2017). Why developmental niche construction is not selective niche construction: And why it matters. Interface Focus, 7(5), 20160157.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2016.0157.Google Scholar
  288. Sugiyama, L. S. (2015). Physical attractiveness: An adaptationist perspective. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (2nd ed., pp. 317–384). Wiley Online Library.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119125563.evpsych112.
  289. Sumter, S. R., Vandenbosch, L., & Ligtenberg, L. (2017). Love me tinder: Untangling emerging adults’ motivations for using the dating application tinder. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 67–78.Google Scholar
  290. Sundie, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Vohs, K. D., & Beal, D. J. (2011). Peacocks, Porsches, and Thorstein Veblen: Conspicuous consumption as a sexual signaling system. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 664–680.Google Scholar
  291. Tallavaara, M., Eronen, J. T., & Luoto, M. (2018). Productivity, biodiversity, and pathogens influence the global hunter-gatherer population density. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(6), 1232–1237.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715638115.
  292. Templer, D. I., & Arikawa, H. (2006). Temperature, skin color, per capita income, and IQ: An international perspective. Intelligence, 34(2), 121–139.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2005.04.002.Google Scholar
  293. The Atlas of Economic Complexity (2017). Country Complexity Rankings. Internet Database Available at: http://atlas.cid.harvard.edu/rankings/ Retrieved on December 6, 2017 and September 3, 2018.
  294. Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (2008). The evolutionary biology of human female sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  295. Thornhill, R., Gangestad, S. W., Miller, R., Scheyd, G., McCollough, J. K., & Franklin, M. (2003). Major histocompatibility complex genes, symmetry, and body scent attractiveness in men and women. Behavioral Ecology, 14(5), 668–678.Google Scholar
  296. Thornhill, R., Fincher, C. L., Murray, D. R., & Schaller, M. (2010). Zoonotic and non-zoonotic diseases in relation to human personality and societal values: Support for the parasite-stress model. Evolutionary Psychology, 8(2), 147470491000800201.Google Scholar
  297. Tifferet, S., Kruger, D. J., Bar-Lev, O., & Zeller, S. (2013). Dog ownership increases attractiveness and attenuates perceptions of short-term mating strategy in cad-like men. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 11(3), 121–129.Google Scholar
  298. Timmermans, E., & Courtois, C. (2018). From swiping to casual sex and/or committed relationships: Exploring the experiences of tinder users. The Information Society, 34(2), 59–70.Google Scholar
  299. Timmermans, E., & De Caluwé, E. (2017). To tinder or not to tinder, that's the question: An individual differences perspective to tinder use and motives. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 74–79.Google Scholar
  300. Toates, F. (2009). An integrative theoretical framework for understanding sexual motivation, arousal, and behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 46(2–3), 168–193.Google Scholar
  301. Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2010). Looks and lies: The role of physical attractiveness in online dating self-presentation and deception. Communication Research, 37(3), 335–351.Google Scholar
  302. Torrence, R. (1983). Time budgeting and hunter-gatherer technology. In G. Bailey (Ed.), Hunter-gatherer economy in prehistory: A European perspective (pp. 11–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  303. Torrence, R. (2000). Hunter-gatherer technology: Macro- and microscale approaches. In C. Panter-Brick, R. H. Layton, & P. Rowley-Conwy (Eds.), Hunter-gatherers: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 99–143). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  304. Tskhay, K. O., Clout, J. M., & Rule, N. O. (2017). The impact of health, wealth, and attractiveness on romantic evaluation from photographs of faces. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 2365–2376.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0963-z.Google Scholar
  305. UN Population Division (2018). World Population Prospects. Internet database. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/sp.ado.tfrt. Retrieved on September 3, 2018.
  306. UN Statistics Division (2017). World Development Indicators 2014. Internet database. Available at: http://data.un.org/Default.aspx. Retrieved on December 20, 2017.
  307. Vaesen, K. (2012). The cognitive bases of human tool use. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(4), 203–218.Google Scholar
  308. Van de Vliert, E. (2009). Climate, affluence, and culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  309. Van de Vliert, E. (2013). White, gray, and black domains of cultural adaptations to climato-economic conditions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(5), 503–521.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13000277.Google Scholar
  310. Van de Vliert, E., & Murray, D. R. (2018). Climate and creativity: Cold and heat trigger invention and innovation in richer populations. Creativity Research Journal, 30(1), 17–28.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1411571.Google Scholar
  311. Van Lange, P. A., Rinderu, M. I., & Bushman, B. J. (2017). Aggression and violence around the world: A model of CLimate, aggression, and self-control in humans (CLASH). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16000406,e75.
  312. Varnum, M. E. W., & Grossmann, I. (2017). Cultural change: The how and the why. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 956–972.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617699971.Google Scholar
  313. Vincze, O. (2016). Light enough to travel or wise enough to stay? Brain size evolution and migratory behavior in birds. Evolution, 70(9), 2123–2133.  https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13012.Google Scholar
  314. Walasek, L., & Brown, G. D. (2015). Income inequality and status seeking: Searching for positional goods in unequal US states. Psychological Science, 26(4), 527–533.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614567511.Google Scholar
  315. Walasek, L., Bhatia, S., & Brown, G. D. (2017). Positional goods and the social rank hypothesis: Income inequality affects online chatter about high and low status brands on twitter. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28, 138–148.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1012.Google Scholar
  316. Wang, M., Rieger, M. O., & Hens, T. (2016). How time preferences differ: Evidence from 53 countries. Journal of Economic Psychology, 52, 115–135.Google Scholar
  317. Wang, G., Cao, M., Sauciuvenaite, J., Bissland, R., Hacker, M., Hambly, C., Vaanholt, L. M., Niu, C., Faries, M. D., & Speakman, J. R. (2018). Different impacts of resources on opposite sex ratings of physical attractiveness by males and females. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(2), 220–225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.12.008.Google Scholar
  318. Ward, T. B., & Kolomyts, Y. (2010). Cognition and creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 93–112). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  319. Wei, W., Lu, J. K., Galinsky, A. D., ... & Wang, L. (2017). Regional ambient temperature is associated with human personality. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 890–895.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0240-0.
  320. Wells, J. C. (2006). The evolution of human fatness and susceptibility to obesity: An ethological approach. Biological Reviews, 81(2), 183–205.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793105006974.Google Scholar
  321. Wells, J. C. (2007). Sexual dimorphism of body composition. Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 21(3), 415–430.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2007.04.007.Google Scholar
  322. Wells, J. C. (2012). Sexual dimorphism in body composition across human populations: Associations with climate and proxies for short-and long-term energy supply. American Journal of Human Biology, 24(4), 411–419.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.22223.Google Scholar
  323. Wells, D. A. (2015). The extended phenotype(s): A comparison with niche construction theory. Biology and Philosophy, 30(4), 547–567.Google Scholar
  324. Wells, J. C., Nesse, R. M., Sear, R., Johnstone, R. A., & Stearns, S. C. (2017). Evolutionary public health: Introducing the concept. The Lancet, 390(10093), 500–509.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30572-X.Google Scholar
  325. West-Eberhard, M. J. (2014). Darwin's forgotten idea: The social essence of sexual selection. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 46, 501–508.Google Scholar
  326. Widemo, F., & Sæther, S. A. (1999). Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: Causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14(1), 26–31.Google Scholar
  327. Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection: A critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  328. Wilson, M. L., Miller, C. M., & Crouse, K. N. (2017). Humans as a model species for sexual selection research. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 284, 20171320.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1320.Google Scholar
  329. Winegard, B., Winegard, B., & Geary, D. C. (2018). The status competition model of cultural production. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 4, 1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-018-0147-7.Google Scholar
  330. Woodley of Menie, M. A., Cabeca de Baca, T., Fernandes, H. B., Madison, G., Figueredo, A. J., & Aguirre, M. P. (2017). Slow and steady wins the race: K positively predicts fertility in the USA and Sweden. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 3(2), 109–117.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-016-0077-1.Google Scholar
  331. Worthman, C. M., & Trang, K. (2018). Dynamics of body time, social time and life history at adolescence. Nature, 554(7693), 451–457.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25750.Google Scholar
  332. Wright, J., Bolstad, G. H., Araya-Ajoy, Y. G., & Dingemanse, N. J. (2018). Life-history evolution under fluctuating density-dependent selection and the adaptive alignment of pace-of-life syndromes. Biological Reviews.  https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12451.
  333. Zietsch, B. P., Verweij, K. J., & Burri, A. V. (2012). Heritability of preferences for multiple cues of mate quality in humans. Evolution, 66(6), 1762–1772.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.English, Drama and Writing StudiesUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.School of PsychologyUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations