Advertisement

The Effect of Negative Implicit Affect, Prime Visibility, and Gender on Effort-Related Cardiac Response

  • David Framorando
  • Guido H. E. Gendolla
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

Objectives

Based on the Implicit-Affect-Primes-Affect (IAPE) model (Gendolla 2012, 2015), we investigated the effect of affect primes’ visibility on effort-related cardiac response.

Methods

Participants worked on a cognitive “parity task” with integrated pictures of sad vs. angry faces that were briefly flashed (25 ms) vs. clearly visible (780 ms). We recorded cardiac pre-ejection period (PEP) to assess effort mobilization.

Results

As expected, PEP reactivity in the sadness-prime condition was stronger than in the anger-prime condition when the primes were briefly flashed, while the opposite pattern occurred when the affect primes were clearly visible. However, these effects only occurred for men, but not for women, as indicated by a significant prime x prime visibility x gender interaction.

Conclusions

These findings provide new evidence for the role of prime visibility as a moderator of automatic effort mobilization—and suggest that this moderator effect applies especially to men.

Keywords

Implicit affect Effort Automaticity Cardiovascular response Gender 

Notes

Acknowledgements

David Framorando and Guido H. E. Gendolla, Geneva Motivation Lab, FPSE, Section of Psychology, University of Geneva, Switzerland. This research was supported by a grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF 100014-162399) awarded to Guido Gendolla. We thank Deniz Kilicel for her help as hired experimenter.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest Statement

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

40750_2018_97_MOESM1_ESM.docx (26 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 26 kb)

References

  1. Berntson, G. G., Lozano, D. L., Chen, Y.-J., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). Where to Q in PEP. Psychophysiology, 41, 333–337.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2004.00156.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brehm, J. W., & Self, E. A. (1989). The intensity of motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 109–131.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.40.020189.000545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chaillou, A. C., Giersch, A., Bonnefond, A., Custers, R., & Capa, R. L. (2015). Influence of positive subliminal and supraliminal affective cues on goal pursuit in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 161, 291–298.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2014.10.052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chatelain, M., & Gendolla, G. H. E. (2015). Implicit fear and effort-related cardiac response. Biological Psychology, 111, 73–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.08.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eagly, A. H. (1983). Gender and social influence: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 38, 971–981.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.38.9.971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Framorando, D., & Gendolla, G. H. E. (2018). Prime visibility moderates implicit anger and sadness effects on effort-related cardiac response. Biological Psychology, 135, 2014–2210.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.04.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Freydefont, L., Gendolla, G. H. E., & Silvestrini, N. (2012). Beyond valence: The differential effect of masked anger and sadness stimuli on effort-related cardiac response. Psychophysiology, 49, 665–671.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01340.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gendolla, G. H. E. (2012). Implicit affect primes effort: A theory and research on cardiovascular response. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 86, 123–135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.05.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gendolla, G. H. E. (2015). Implicit affect primes effort: Basic processes, moderators, and boundary conditions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9, 606–619.  https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gendolla, G. H. E., & Silvestrini, N. (2011). Smiles make it easier and so do frowns: Masked affective stimuli influence mental effort. Emotion, 11, 320–328.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kelsey, R. M. (2012). Beta-adrenergic cardiovascular reactivity and adaptation to stress: The cardiac pre-ejection period as an index of effort. In R. A. Wright & G. H. E. Gendolla (Eds.), How motivation affects cardiovascular response: Mechanisms and applications (pp. 43–60). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kreibig, S. D., Gendolla, G. H. E., & Scherer, K. R. (2012). Goal relevance and goal conduciveness appraisals lead to differential autonomic reactivity in emotional responding to performance feedback. Biological Psychology, 91, 365–375.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.08.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lasauskaite Schüpbach, R., Gendolla, G. H. E., & Silvestrini, N. (2014). Contrasting the effects of suboptimally versus optimally presented affect primes on effort-related cardiac response. Motivation and Emotion, 38, 748–758.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9438-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lasauskaite, R., Gendolla, G. H. E., & Silvestrini, N. (2013). Do sadness-primes make me work harder because they make me sad? Cognition and Emotion, 27, 158–165.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2012.689756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lasauskaite, R., Gendolla, G. H. E., Bolmont, M., & Freydefont, L. (2017). Implicit happiness and sadness are associated with ease and difficulty: Evidence from sequential priming. Psychological Research, 81, 321–331.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0732-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Loersch, C., & Payne, B. K. (2012). On mental contamination: The role of (mis) attribution in behavior priming. Social Cognition, 30, 241–252.  https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2012.30.2.241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lombardi, W. J., Higgins, E. T., & Bargh, J. A. (1987). The role of consciousness in priming effects on categorization: Assimilation versus contrast as a function of awareness of the priming task. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 411–429.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167287133009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lozano, D. L., Norman, G., Knox, D., Wood, B. L., Miller, D., Emery, C. F., & Berntson, G. G. (2007). Where to B in dZ/dt. Psychophysiology, 44, 113–119.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00468.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lundqvist, D., & Litton, J. E. (1998). The averaged Karolinska directed emotional faces—AKDEF. Stockholm, Sweden: CD ROM from Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology section, Karolinska Institutet.Google Scholar
  21. Maccoby, E. E. (1990). Gender and relationships: A developmental account. American Psychologist, 45, 513–520.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.4.513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 723–739.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Reinders, A., Reggiori, F., & Shennan, A. H. (2006). Validation of the DINAMAP ProCare blood pressure device according to the international protocol in an adult population. Blood Pressure Monitoring, 11, 293–296.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mbp.0000217998.96967.fb.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Richter, M. (2010). BlueBox 2 v1.22. [Computer Software]. University of Geneva.Google Scholar
  25. Richter, M., & Gendolla, G. H. E. (2009). The heart contracts to reward: Monetary incentives and pre-ejection period. Psychophysiology, 46, 451–457.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00795.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Richter, M., Friedrich, A., & Gendolla, G. H. E. (2008). Task difficulty effects on cardiac activity. Psychophysiology, 45, 869–875.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00688.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rotteveel, M., de Groot, P., Geutskens, A., & Phaf, R. H. (2001). Stronger suboptimal than optimal affective priming? Emotion, 1, 348–364.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.1.4.348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and wellbeing. American Psychologist, 55, 78–88.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Scherhag, A., Kaden, J. J., Kentschke, E., Sueselbeck, T., & Borggrefe, M. (2005). Comparison of impedance cardiography and thermodilution-derived measurements of stroke volume and cardiac output at rest and during exercise testing. Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, 19, 141–147.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-005-1048-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Seemann, E. A., Buboltz, W. C., Jenkins, S. M., Soper, B., & Woller, K. (2004). Ethnic and gender differences in psychological reactance: The importance of reactance in multicultural counselling. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 17, 167–176.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070410001728316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sherwood, A., Allen, M. T., Fahrenberg, J., Kelsey, R. M., Lovallo, W. R., & Doornen, L. J. P. (1990). Methodological guidelines for impedance cardiography. Psychophysiology, 27, 1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1990.tb02171.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Silvestrini, N., & Gendolla, G. H. E. (2011). Do not prime too much: Prime frequency effects of masked affective stimuli on effort-related cardiovascular response. Biological Psychology, 87, 195–199.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.01.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Strack, F., Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Kübler, A., & Wänke, M. (1993). Awareness of the influence as a determinant of assimilation versus contrast. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 53–62.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420230105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Verwijmeren, T., Karremans, J. C., Bernritter, S. F., Stroebe, W., & Wigboldus, D. H. (2013). Warning: You are being primed! The effect of a warning on the impact of subliminal ads. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 1124–1129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.06.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wheeler, S. C., DeMarree, K. G., & Petty, R. E. (2007). Understanding the role of the self in prime-to-behavior effects: The active-self account. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 234–261.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307302223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wolford, G., & Morrison, F. (1980). Processing of unattended visual information. Memory & Cognition, 8, 521–527.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Woller, K. M., Buboltz, W. C., & Loveland, J. M. (2007). Psychological reactance: Examination across age, ethnicity, and gender. The American Journal of Psychology, 120, 15–24.  https://doi.org/10.1586/ern.09.62.Google Scholar
  38. Wright, R. A. (1996). Brehm's theory of motivation as a model of effort and cardiovascular response. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 424–453). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  39. Zafeiriou, A., & Gendolla, G. H. E. (2018). Implicit aging: Masked age primes influence effort-related cardiovascular response in young adults. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 4, 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-017-0074-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geneva Motivation Lab, FPSE, Section of PsychologyUniversity of GenevaGeneva 4Switzerland

Personalised recommendations