Advertisement

Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 306–320 | Cite as

Are Men’s Religious Ties Hormonally Regulated?

  • Aniruddha Das
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Objectives

Studies based on the “challenge hypothesis” have linked men’s androgens—testosterone and DHEA—to short term mating and antisocial behaviors. Causal direction at a given stage of the life cycle remains ambiguous. Religion is a major social institution through which actions violating social norms are controlled. Thus, ties to this institution may be lower among men with higher androgen levels. The present study queried these linkages.

Procedures

Data were from the 2005–2006 and 2010–2011 waves of the National Social Life, Health and Aging Project (NSHAP), a national probability sample of older U.S. adults. Analysis was through autoregressive cross-lagged panel models (minimum N = 1071).

Results

Higher baseline levels of both testosterone and DHEA prospectively predicted religious ties, whether measured through attendance at services or network connections to clergy. Moreover, contrary to arguments of sociocultural modulation of androgens, the pattern of associations was most consistent with hormonal causation of religious connections. Results were robust to a range of time invariant and time varying confounders, including demographics, hormone supplements, and physical health.

Conclusions

Findings add to the growing evidence that religiosity may have physiological and not simply psychosocial roots. Implications for hormonal confounding of previously published religion-deviance linkages, and for neuroendocrine underpinnings of population-level social and cultural patterns, are discussed.

Keywords

Challenge hypothesis Salivary androgens Testosterone DHEA Religious connections Older men 

Notes

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Archer, J. (2006). Testosterone and human aggression: An evaluation of the challenge hypothesis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 319–345.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.12.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aromaki, A. S., Lindman, R. E., & Eriksson, C. J. P. (1999). Testosterone, aggressiveness, and antisocial personality. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 113–123.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2337(1999)25:2<113::aid-ab4>3.3.co;2-w.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, J. B., Berkley, K. J., Geary, N., Hampson, E., Herman, J., & Young, E. (Eds.). (2008). Sex differences in the brain: From genes to behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Berenbaum, S. A., Blakemore, J. E. O., & Beltz, A. M. (2011). A role for biology in gender-related behavior. Sex Roles, 64, 804–825.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9990-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradshaw, M., & Ellison, C. G. (2009). The nature-nurture debate is over, and both sides lost! Implications for understanding gender differences in religiosity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48, 241–251.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01443.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradshaw, M., & Ellison, C. G. (2010). Financial hardship and psychological distress: Exploring the buffering effects of religion. Social Science & Medicine, 71, 196–204.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.03.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buck, A. C., Williams, D. R., Musick, M. A., & Sternthal, M. J. (2009). An examination of the relationship between multiple dimensions of religiosity, blood pressure and hypertension. Social Science & Medicine, 68, 314–322.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.10.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carré, J. M., & Olmstead, N. A. (2015). Social neuroendocrinology of human aggression: Examining the role of competition-induced testosterone dynamics. Neuroscience, 286, 171–186.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.11.029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cook, E. A., Jelen, T. G., & Wilcox, C. (1992). Between two absolutes: Public opinion and the politics of abortion. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  10. Cornwell, B., Laumann, E. O., & Schumm, L. P. (2008). The social connectedness of older adults: A national profile. American Sociological Review, 73, 185–203.  https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240807300201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crosnoe, R., & Elder Jr., G. H. (2002). Successful adaptation in the later years: A life course approach to aging. Social Psychology Quarterly, 65, 309–328.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3090105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Curran, P. J. (2000). A latent curve framework for the study of developmental trajectories in adolescent substance use. In J. S. Rose, L. Chassin, C. C. Presson, & S. J. Sherman (Eds.), Multivariate applications in substance use research: New methods for new questions (pp. 1–4). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  13. Dabbs Jr., J. M. (1990). Salivary testosterone measurements: Reliability across hours, days, and weeks. Physiology & Behavior, 48, 83–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(90)90265-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dabbs Jr., J. M., & Morris, R. (1990). Testosterone, social class, and antisocial behavior in a sample of 4,462 men. Psychological Science, 1, 209–211.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00200.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Das, A., & Nairn, S. (2014). Conservative Christianity, partnership, hormones and sex in late life. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 1403–1415.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0273-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellis, L., Hoskin, A. W., & Ratnasingam, M. (2016). Testosterone, risk taking, and religiosity: Evidence from two cultures. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 55, 153–173.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellison, C. G., & Nybroten, K. A. (1999). Conservative protestantism and opposition to state-sponsored lotteries: Evidence from the 1997 Texas poll. Social Science Quarterly, 80, 356–369.Google Scholar
  18. Ferraro, K. F., & Kim, S. (2014). Health benefits of religion among black and white older adults? Race, religiosity, and C-reactive protein. Social Science and Medicine, 120, 92–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gavrilova, N., & Lindau, S. T. (2009). Salivary sex hormone measurement in a national, population-based study of older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64B, i94–i105.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbn028.
  20. Gettler, L. T., & Oka, R. C. (2016). Aging US males with multiple sources of emotional social support have low testosterone. Hormones and Behavior, 78, 32–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.10.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Granger, D. A., Kivlighan, K. T., Fortunato, C., Harmon, A. G., Hibel, L. C., Schwartz, E. B., & Whembolua, G.-L. (2007). Integration of salivary biomarkers into developmental and behaviorally-oriented research: Problems and solutions for collecting specimens. Physiology & Behavior, 92, 583–590.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.05.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gröschl, M., Wagner, R., Rauh, M., & Dörr, H. G. (2001). Stability of salivary steroids: The influences of storage, food and dental care. Steroids, 66, 737–741.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-128x(01)00111-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hall, S. A., Esche, G. R., Araujo, A. B., Travison, T. G., Clark, R. V., Williams, R. E., & McKinlay, J. B. (2008). Correlates of low testosterone and symptomatic androgen deficiency in a population-based sample. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 93, 3870–3877.  https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-0021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Halpern, C. T., Udry, J. R., Campbell, B., Suchindran, C., & Masont, G. A. (1994). Testosterone and religiosity as predictors of sexual attitudes and activity among adolescent males: A biosocial model. Journal of Biosocial Science, 26, 217–234.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021932000021258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hines, M. (2011). Gender development and the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 34, 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Katz, S. (1983). Assessing self maintenance: Activities of daily living, mobility and instrumental activities of daily living. Journal of American Geriatrics Society, 31, 721–726.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1983.tb03391.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kelly, P. E., Polanin, J. R., Jang, S. J., & Johnson, B. R. (2015). Religion, delinquency, and drug use: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice Review, 40, 505–523.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016815605151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kozloski, M. J., Schumm, L. P., & McClintock, M. K. (2014). The utility and dynamics of salivary sex hormone measurements in the National Social Life, health, and aging project, wave 2. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69, S215–S228.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbu123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Krause, N. M. (2008). Aging in the church: How social relationships affect health. Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.Google Scholar
  30. Leege, D. C., & Kellstedt, L. A. (1993). Rediscovering the religious factor in American politics. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.Google Scholar
  31. Levin, J., & Chatters, L. M. (2008). Religion, aging and health: Historical perspectives, current trends and future directions. Journal of Religion, Spirituality & Aging, 20, 153–172.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15528030801922103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Linquist, S., Machery, E., Griffiths, P. E., & Stotz, K. (2011). Exploring the folkbiological conception of human nature. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366, 444–453.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller, A. S., & Stark, R. (2002). Gender and religiousness: Can socialization explanations be saved? American Journal of Sociology, 107, 1399–1423.  https://doi.org/10.1086/342557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nyante, S. J., Graubard, B. I., Li, Y., Mcquillan, G. M., Platz, E. A., Rohrmann, S., et al. (2012). Trends in sex hormone concentrations in US males: 1988-1991 to 1999-2004. International Journal of Andrology, 35, 456–466.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2011.01230.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. O’Muircheartaigh, C. A., English, N., Pedlow, S., & Kwok, P. K. (2014). Sample design, sample augmentation, and estimation for wave 2 of the NSHAP. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69, S15–S26.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbu053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Qato, D. M., Schumm, L. P., Johnson, M., Mihai, A., & Lindau, S. T. (2009). Medication data collection and coding in a home-based survey of older adults. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64, i86–i93.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbp036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Regnerus, M. D. (2007). Forbidden fruit: Sex and religion in the lives of American teenagers. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schieman, S. (2010). Socioeconomic status and beliefs about god’s influence in everyday life. Sociology of Religion: A. Quarterly Review, 71, 25–51.  https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/srq004.Google Scholar
  40. Schnittker, J. (2008). Happiness and success: Genes, families, and the psychological effects of socioeconomic position and social support. American Journal of Sociology, 114, S233–S259.  https://doi.org/10.1086/592424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sherkat, D. E., & Ellison, C. G. (1997). The cognitive structure of a moral crusade: Conservative Protestantism and opposition to pornography. Social Forces, 75, 957–980.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2580714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sherkat, D. E., & Ellison, C. G. (1999). Recent developments and current controversies in the sociology of religion. Annual Review Sociology, 25, 363–394.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stark, R. (1996). Religion as context: Hellfire and delinquency one more time. Sociology of Religion, 57, 163–173.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3711948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stark, R. (2002). Physiology and faith: Addressing the “universal” gender difference in religious commitment. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 495–507.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5906.00133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Udry, J. R. (1988). Biological predispositions and social control in adolescent sexual behavior. American Sociological Review, 53, 709–722.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2095817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Van Anders, S. M., Hamilton, L. D., & Watson, N. V. (2007). Multiple partners are associated with higher testosterone in north American men and women. Hormones and Behavior, 51, 454–459.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Van Anders, S. M., Goldey, K. L., & Bell, S. N. (2014). Measurement of testosterone in human sexuality research: Methodological considerations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 231–250.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0123-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Van Anders, S. M., Steiger, J., & Goldey, K. L. (2015). Effects of gendered behavior on testosterone in women and men. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 13805–13810.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509591112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Weuve, J., Tchetgen Tchetgen, E. J., Glymour, M. M., Beck, T. L., Aggarwal, N. T., Wilson, R. S., Evans, D. A., & Mendes de Leon, C. F. (2012). Accounting for bias due to selective attrition: The example of smoking and cognitive decline. Epidemiology, 23, 119–128.  https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e318230e861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wilcox, W. B. (2006). Religion and the domestication of men. Contexts, 5, 42–46.Google Scholar
  51. Williams, S. R., Pham-Kanter, G., & Leitsch, S. A. (2009). Measures of chronic conditions and diseases associated with aging in the National Social Life, health, and aging project. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64, i67–i75.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbn015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wingfield, J. C., Hegner, R. E., Dufty Jr, A. M., & Ball, G. F. (1990). The “challenge hypothesis”: Theoretical implications for patterns of testosterone secretion, mating systems, and breeding strategies. The American Naturalist, 136, 829–846. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/285134

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyMcGill UniversityQuebecCanada

Personalised recommendations