A Review of Attractiveness Preferences in Infancy: From Faces to Objects
Despite some interpersonal variability, judgments of facial attractiveness are largely shared by most individuals, both within and between cultures. Infants are also sensitive to attractive faces even before being influenced by cultural standards of beauty. The intercultural agreement on this matter and its emergence during infancy suggest an evolutionary basis for facial attractiveness. Sensitivity to facial attractiveness is typically understood through evolutionary-based frameworks, either reflecting mate selection mechanisms or emerging as by-products of brain processing and perceptual sensory biases. In the current article, we review data on the emergence and the development of attractiveness preferences in infants, focusing on mechanisms that may explain or contribute to these preferences such as familiarity or fluency in processing. We further discuss the possibility that infants’ preference for attractiveness could extend to other stimuli than faces like objects or visual art. Potential directions for future research are proposed for developmental and comparative approaches.
KeywordsAttractiveness Infants Visual preferences Faces Objects
Compliance with ethical standards
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
- Bushnell, I. W. R. (2003). Newborn face recognition. In O. Pascalis & A. M. Slater (Eds.), The development of face processing in infancy and early childhood: Current perspectives (pp. 41–53). Huntington: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
- Cunningham, M. R., Roberts, A. R., Barbee, A. P., Druen, P. B., & Wu, C.-H. (1995). Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours: Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 261–279. doi: 10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Giannouli, V. (2013). Visual symmetry perception. Encephalos, 50, 31–42.Google Scholar
- Goren, C. C., Sarty, M., & Wu, P. Y. K. (1975). Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants. Pediatrics, 56, 544–549.Google Scholar
- Heron-Delaney, M., Damon, F., Quinn, P. C., Méary, D., Xiao, N. G., Lee, K., & Pascalis, O. (2016). An adult face bias in infants that is modulated by face race. International Journal of Behavioral Development. doi: 10.1177/0165025416651735.
- Johnson, M. H., Dziurawiec, S., Ellis, H., & Morton, J. (1991). Newborns’ preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline. Cognition, 40, 1–19.Google Scholar
- Park, J., Shimojo, E., & Shimojo, S. (2010). Roles of familiarity and novelty in visual preference judgments are segregated across object categories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 14552–14555. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1004374107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Quinn, P. C. (2011). Born to categorize. In U. Goswami (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (2nd ed., pp. 129–152). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Quinn, P. C., Kelly, D. J., Lee, K., Pascalis, O., & Slater, A. M. (2008a). Preference for attractive faces in human infants extends beyond conspecifics. Developmental Science, 11, 76–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00647.x.
- Quinn, P. C., & Slater, A. M. (2003). Face processing at birth and beyond. In O. Pascalis & A. M. Slater (Eds.), The development of face processing in infancy and early childhood: Current perspectives (pp. 3–11). Huntington: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
- Quinn, P. C., Uttley, L., Lee, K., Gibson, A., Smith, M., Slater, A. M., & Pascalis, O. (2008b). Infant preference for female faces occurs for same- but not other-race faces. Journal of Neuropsychology, 2, 15–26. doi: 10.1348/174866407X231029.
- Reber, R., & Schwarz, N. (2006). Perceptual fluency, preference, and evolution. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 37, 16–22.Google Scholar
- Rennels, J. L., Kayl, A. J., Langlois, J. H., Davis, R. E., & Orlewicz, M. (2016). Asymmetries in infants’ attention toward and categorization of male faces: The potential role of experience. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 142, 137–157. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.09.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Slater, A. M. (2002). Visual perception in the newborn infant: Issues and debates. Intellectica, 34, 57–76.Google Scholar
- Zebrowitz, L. A., & Rhodes, G. (2004). Sensitivity to “bad genes” and the anomalous face overgeneralization effect: Cue validity, cue utilization, and accuracy in judging intelligence and health. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28, 167–185. doi: 10.1023/B:JONB.0000039648.30935.1b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar