Annals of Data Science

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 673–705 | Cite as

Estimation and Prediction for Gompertz Distribution Under the Generalized Progressive Hybrid Censored Data

  • M. M. Mohie El-Din
  • M. Nagy
  • M. H. Abu-MoussaEmail author


In this paper, the statistical inference for the Gompertz distribution based on generalized progressively hybrid censored data is discussed. The estimation of the parameters for Gompertz distribution is discussed using the maximum likelihood method and the Bayesian methods under different loss functions. The existence and uniqueness of the maximum likelihood estimation are proved. The point and interval Bayesian predictions for unobserved failures from the same sample and that from the future sample are derived. The Monte Carlo simulation is applied to compare the proposed methods. A real data example is used to apply the methods of estimation and to construct the prediction intervals.


Bayesian estimation Generalized progressive hyprid censored samples Gompertz distribution Maximum likelihood estimation Bayesian prediction intervals 

Mathematics Subject Classification

Primary 62G30 Secondary 62F15 



This project was supported by King Saud University, Deanship of Scientific Research, College of Science Research Center. The authors are sincerely grateful to the referees and to the Editor-in-Chief for their many constructive comments and careful reading of the paper.


  1. 1.
    Aggarwala R, Balakrishnan N (1998) Some properties of progressive censored order statistics from arbitrary and uniform distributions with applications to inference and simulation. J Stat Plan Inference 70:35–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cramer E, Iliopoulos G (2010) Adaptive progressive Type-II ensoring. Test 19:342–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Raqab MZ, Asgharzadeh A, Valiollahi R (2010) Prediction for Pareto distribution based on progressively Type-II censored samples. Comput Stat Data Anal 54:1732–1743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mohie El-Din MM, Shafay AR (2013) One-and two-sample Bayesian prediction intervals based on progressively Type-II censored data. Stat Pap 54:287–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Balakrishnan N, Cohen AC (2014) Order statistics–inference: estimation methods. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kundu D, Joarder A (2006) Analysis of Type-II progressively hybrid censored data. Comput Stat Data Anal 50:2509–2528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Childs A, Chandrasekar B, Balakrishnan N (2008) Exact likelihood inference for an exponential parameter under progressive hybrid censoring schemes. In: Statistical models and methods for biomedical and technical systems, pp 319-330Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lin CT, Chou CC, Huang YL (2012) Inference for the Weibull distribution with progressive hybrid censoring. Comput Stat Data Anal 56:451–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lin CT, Huang YL (2012) On progressive hybrid censored exponential distribution. J Stat Comput Simul 82:689–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hemmati F, Khorram E (2013) Statistical analysis of the log-normal distribution under Type-II progressive hybrid censoring schemes. Commun Stat Simul Comput 42:52–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mohie El-Din MM, Abdel-Aty Y, Abu-Moussa MH (2017) Statistical inference for the Gompertz distribution based on Type-II progressively hybrid censored data. Commun Stat Simul Comput 46(8):6242–6260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cho Y, Sun H, Lee K (2015) Exact likelihood inference for an exponential parameter under generalized progressive hybrid censoring scheme. Stat Methodol 23:18–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gompertz B (1825) On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 115:513–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wu C, Wu S, Chan H (2006) MLE and the estimated expected test time for the two-parameter Gompertz distribution under progressive censoring with binomial removals. Appl Math Comput 181(2):1657–1670Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mohie El-Din MM, Abu-Moussa MH (2018) statistical inference and prediction for the Gompertz distribution based on multiply Type-I censored data. J Egypt Math Soc 26(2):218–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ghitany M, Alqallaf F, Balakrishnan N (2014) On the likelihood estimation of the parameters of Gompertz distribution based on complete and progressively Type-II censored samples. J Stat Comput Simul 84(8):1803–1812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Al-Bayyati HN (2002) Comparing methods of estimating Weibull failure models using simulation. Unpublished PhD thesisGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, Teller AH, Teller E (1953) Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys 21(6):1087–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Basak I, Basak P, Balakrishnan N (2006) On some predictors of times to failure of censored items in progressively censored samples. Comput Stat Data Anal 50:1313–1337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Balakrishnan N, Childs A, Chandrasekar B (2002) An efficient computationalmethod formoments of order statistics under progressive censoring. Stat Probab Lett 60:359–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wu SJ, Chang CT, Tsai T-R (2003) Point and interval estimations for the Gompertz distribution under progressive type-II censoring. Metron 61(3):403–418Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. M. Mohie El-Din
    • 1
  • M. Nagy
    • 2
    • 3
  • M. H. Abu-Moussa
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics, Faculty of ScienceAl-Azhar UniversityCairoEgypt
  2. 2.Department of Statistics and Operation Reseach, College of ScienceKing Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia
  3. 3.Department of Mathematics, Faculty of ScienceFayoum UniversityFayoumEgypt
  4. 4.Department of Mathematics, Faculty of ScienceCairo UniversityGizaEgypt

Personalised recommendations