Evaluating the Impact of Inpatient Mental Health Rehabilitation on Quality of Life and Recovery

  • Paul BaylissEmail author
  • Katie Nic Dhonnacha
  • Daniella Allen
  • Samuel Coe
  • Alice Richards
Original Article


Previous evaluations of mental health rehabilitation services have mostly examined clinician-rated or objective outcomes. There is also a need to consider subjective, patient-rated outcomes such as quality of life and recovery. Service users in a rehabilitation unit were invited to complete quality of life and recovery measures at admission and discharge. Of 79 eligible service users, 48 (60.8%) completed measures at both admission and discharge. Significant improvements were noted in overall quality of life and recovery, as well as most individual domains of quality of life. Satisfaction with family relationships showed only modest improvement. Satisfaction with sex life showed no significant change. Users of the rehabilitation service experienced improvements in quality of life and recovery. The evaluation’s main limitations were the lack of a control group, the lack of follow-up, and the possibility of differential drop-out. Clinical and research implications are discussed.


Mental Health rehabilitation Evaluation Quality of life Recovery 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The lead author was employed as a clinical psychologist in the unit being evaluated. All other authors were interns in the unit being evaluated. No other conflicts of interest are identified.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  1. 1.
    Holloway F, Kalidindi S, Killaspy H, Roberts G, editors. Enabling recovery: the principles and practice of rehabilitation psychiatry. London: RCPsych Publications; 2015.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Iyer SN, Rothmann TL, Vogler JE, et al. Evaluating outcomes of rehabilitation for severe mental illness. Rehabil Psychol. 2005;50(1):43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bunyan M, Ganeshalingam Y, Morgan E, et al. In-patient rehabilitation: clinical outcomes and cost implications. BJPsych Bull. 2016;40:24–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Petrie RX, Mountain DA. An observational study of the impact of a rehabilitation admission on readmission data. Scott Med J. 2009;54:32–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grinshpoon A, Abramowitz MZ, Lerner Y, Zilber N. Rehospitalization of first-in-life admitted schizophrenic patients before and after rehabilitation legislation: a comparison of two national cohorts. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007;42:355–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tsoutsoulis K, Maxwell A, Padinjareveettil AMP, Zivkovic F, Rogers JM. Impact of inpatient mental health rehabilitation on psychiatric readmissions: a propensity score matched case control study. J Ment Health. 2018; Epub ahead of print.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lavelle E, Ijaz, A, Killaspy, H et al. Mental health rehabilitation and recovery services in Ireland: A multicentre study of current service provision, characteristics of service users and outcomes for those with and without access to these services. 2011; Final Report for the Mental Health Commission of Ireland.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Killaspy H, Zis P. Predictors of outcomes for users of mental health rehabilitation services: a 5-year retrospective cohort study in inner London, UK. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2013;48:1005–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Killaspy H, Marston L, Green N, et al. Clinical outcomes and costs for people with complex psychosis; a naturalistic prospective cohort study of mental health rehabilitation service users in England. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16:95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Murugesan G, Amey CG, Deane FP, Jeffrey R, Kelly B, Stain H. Inpatient psychosocial rehabilitation in rural NSW: assessment of clinically significant change for people with severe mental illness. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2007;41:343–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gonda T, Deane FP, Murugesan GA. Predicting clinically significant change in an inpatient program for people with severe mental illness. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2012;46(7):651–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Joint Commissioning Panel for Mental Health. Guidance for commissioners of rehabilitation services for people with complex mental health needs. London: Joint Commissioning Panel for Mental Health; 2016.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Killaspy H, Marston L, Omar RZ, et al. Service quality and clinical outcomes: an example from mental health rehabilitation services in England. Br J Psychiatry. 2013;202:28–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Svavarsdottir SJ, Lindqvist R, Juliusdattir S. Mental health services and quality of life. Int J Psychosoc Rehabilit. 2014;18(2):72–88.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eack SM, Newhill CE. Psychiatric symptoms and quality of life in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull. 2007;33:1225–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Priebe S, Huxley PJ, Knight S, Evans S. Application and results of the manchester short assessment of quality of life (MANSA). Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1999;45(1):7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Štrkalj-Ivezić S, Vrdoljak M, Mužinić L, Agius M. The impact of a rehabilitation day centre program for persons suffering from schizophrenia on quality of life, social functioning and self-esteem. Psychiatr Danub. 2013;25(Suppl. 2):194–9.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Crawford MJ, Robotham D, Thana L, et al. Selecting outcome measures in mental health: the views of service users. J Ment Health. 2011;20(4):336–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Neil ST, Kilbride M, Pitt L, et al. The questionnaire about the process of recovery (QPR): a measurement tool developed in collaboration with service users. Psychosis. 2009;1:145–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Williams J, Leamy M, Pesola F, Bird V, Boutillier C, Slade M. Psychometric evaluation of the questionnaire about the process of recovery (QPR). Br J Psychiatry. 2015;207(6):551–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge Academic; 1988.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature India Private Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Amberstone HospitalSussex Partnership NHS Foundation TrustEast SussexUK
  2. 2.East London NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK

Personalised recommendations