A Program to Discharge Individuals with Long Term Psychiatric Hospitalizations

  • Tom BartholomewEmail author
Rehabilitation facility & services


Despite a substantial decrease in the number of people confined to state psychiatric hospitals in the last decade, some individuals remain hospitalized who are no longer determined to be a danger to themselves, property or others but for whom discharge has been problematic. The clinical issues that affect the discharge of these individuals generally fall into four categories (Boyer et al. in Barriers to discharge, optimal housing and supportive mental health services for residents with conditional extension pending placement legal status, 2006). The first occurs when hospitalized individuals are resistant to discharge, the second occurs when individuals have persistent non-dangerous psychiatric symptoms and or behavior problems that make discharge difficult. The third and fourth barriers, respectively, involve individuals with major medical co-morbidities and/or co-occurring intellectual disability. This paper describes a program designed to discharge individuals who present with one or more of these unique needs in one state psychiatric hospital in the north eastern United States. “The Special Treatment Cottage” (STC) program was initiated for hospitalized individuals who had been determined ready to be discharged but who remained in the hospital until they were willing or able to tolerate discharge and until appropriate residential services could be found. The STC program involved the development of a specialized therapeutic setting in which clinical discharge barriers would be targeted and the focus of treatment would be on discharge. In the first year of operation the STC program admitted a total of 22 residents with an average length of hospitalization of over 5 years. Fifty percent of the hospitalized individuals (11) were discharge within an average of 7 months of entering the program. The clinical strategies utilized are discussed along with a description of the critical ingredients thought to be responsible for the success of the program. Suggestions for future work in this area are also addressed.


Inpatient Discharge Institutionalized 



Special thanks to Chris Morrison, Robyn Caporoso and Faith Johnson for their invaluable leadership in this project.


  1. 1.
    Boyer CA, Kontorinakis M, Scotto-Rosato N, Lucas JA, Fuller R, Howell-White S (2006) Barriers to discharge, optimal housing and supportive mental health services for residents with conditional extension pending placement legal status. Final report to the New Jersey Department of Human Services, Division of Mental Health Services.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davidson L, Hoge MA, Merrill ME, Rakefeldt J, Griffith EE. Hospital or community living? Examining consumer perspective on deinstitutionalization. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 1996;19(3):49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deegan PE. Recovery: the lived experience of rehabilitation. Psychosoc J. 1988;11(4):11–9.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deegan PE (1996) Recovery and the conspiracy of hope. In: Transcript of a presentation given at: the sixth annual mental health services conference of Australia and New Zealand.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deegan PE (2004) Rethinking rehabilitation: freedom. In: Transcript of a presentation given at: the 20th world congress of rehabilitation international: rethinking rehabilitation, Olso, Norway.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deegan PE (2005) Relationships can heal. Unpublished article, p. 317.
  7. 7.
    Fisher WH, Geller JL, Pandiani JA. The changing role of the State Psychiatric Hospital. Health Aff. 2009;28(3):676–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leff J, Trieman N. Long-stay patients discharged from psychiatric hospitals. Br J Psychiatry. 2000;176:217–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Linn LS. State Hospital Environment and rates of discharge. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1970;23(4):346–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mechanic D. Mental health and social policy: the emergence of managed care. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 1999.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mueser KT, Meyer PS, Penn DL, Clancy R, Clancy D, Saylers M. The illness management and recovery program: rationale, development, and preliminary findings. Schizophr Bull. 2006;32:1:S32–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    New Jersey Division of Mental Health (2008) Home to recovery CEPP plan; plan to facilitate the timely discharge of CEPP s in New Jersey’s State Psychiatric Hospital. Accessed 5 Apr 2011.
  13. 13.
    Patrick V, Smith RC, Schleifer SJ, Morris ME, McLennon K. Facilitating discharge in state psychiatric institutions: a group intervention strategy. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2006;29(3):183–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Singh Nirbhay N, Barber JW, VanSant S. Handbook of recovery in inpatient psychiatry. Basel: Springer; 2016. Scholar
  15. 15.
    Trieman N, Leff J. Long-term outcome of long-stay psychiatric in-patients considered unsuitable to live in the community. Br J Psychiatry. 2002;181:428–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wirt GL. Institutionalism revisited: prevalence of the institutionalized person. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 1999;22:302–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wirt GL. Causes of institutionalism: and staff perspectives. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 1999;20:259–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature India Private Limited 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychiatric Rehabilitation and Counseling ProfessionsRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations