Advertisement

Activity Based Group Intervention in Improving Negative Symptoms and Functional Outcome in Patients with Chronic Schizophrenia in Welfare Homes

  • Rajith K. Ravindren
  • T. M. Shibukumar
  • Bhagya Lekshmi
  • Kurian Jose
Original Article
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

Schizophrenia causes significant cognitive deficits, negative symptoms and functional impairment. These symptoms persist in certain patients in spite of evidence based pharmacological treatment. Many of these patients remain confined in welfare homes run by government or non-governmental organisations. Intervention modules to improve the condition of patients in these homes are scarce in India. We designed an activity based group intervention and assessed its effectiveness in patients with chronic schizophrenia in a welfare home. Participants were patients with chronic schizophrenia who were inmates of a welfare home for persons with mental illness. All of the subjects underwent evaluations that assessed clinical symptoms and functional outcomes at baseline and after 6 months. The evaluation was done using PANSS and RTI-E. The intervention was multimodal. The patients showed significant improvement in negative symptoms (effect size r = − 0.39). They showed improvement in activities of daily living (r = 0.88), communication (r = − 0.82) and instrumental activities of daily living (r = − 0.59). The current intervention resulted in reducing negative symptoms and improving functional outcome in patients with schizophrenia. These findings advocate the integration of rehabilitation programs into the standard treatment protocol for schizophrenia in welfare homes.

Keywords

Negative symptoms Functional outcome Schizophrenia Cognitive remediation Welfare homes 

References

  1. 1.
    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). Washington: American Psychiatric Pub; 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bellucci DM, Glaberman K, Haslam N. Computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation reduces negative symptoms in the severely mentally ill. Schizophr Res. 2003;59:225–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bowie CR, McGurk SR, Mausbach B, Patterson TL, Harvey PD. Combined cognitive remediation and functional skills training for schizophrenia: effects on cognition, functional competence, and real-world behavior. Am J Psychiatry. 2012;169(7):710–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brekke J, Kay DD, Lee KS, Green MF. Biosocial pathways to functional outcome in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2005;80:213–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hilsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 1988.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coyle JT. Glutamate and schizophrenia: beyond the dopamine hypothesis. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2006;26(4–6):365–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Creek J, Bullock A. Planning and implementation. In: Occupational therapy and mental health; 2008, pp. 109–31.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grant PM, Beck AT. Defeatist beliefs as a mediator of cognitive impairment, negative symptoms, and functioning in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2008;35:798–806.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Green MF, Nuechterlein KH, Gold JM, Barch DM, Cohen J, Essock S, Fenton WS, Frese F, Goldberg TE, Heaton RK, Keefe RS. Approaching a consensus cognitive battery for clinical trials in schizophrenia: the NIMH-MATRICS conference to select cognitive domains and test criteria. Biol Psychiatry. 2004;56(5):301–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hegde S, Rao SL, Raguram A, Gangadhar BN. Addition of home-based cognitive retraining to treatment as usual in first episode schizophrenia patients: a randomized controlled study. Indian journal of psychiatry. 2012;54(1):15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heimann NE, Allen CK, Yerxa EJ. The Routine Task Inventory: a tool for describing the functional behavior of the cognitively disabled. Occupational Therapy Practice. 1989;1:67–74.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hodge MA, Siciliano D, Withey P, Moss B, Moore G, Judd G, et al. A randomized controlled trial of cognitive remediation in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2008;36:419–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Katz N. Routine Task Inventory—RTI–E manual, prepared and elaborated on the basis of Allen.CK, 2006. www.allen-cognitive-network.org (Preprint). 2017 (Cited 2017 Sep 15): Available from http://www.allen-cognitive-network.org/pdf_files/RTIManual2006.pdf.
  14. 14.
    Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opfer LA. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1987;13(2):261–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kay SR, Opler LA, Lindenmayer JP. Reliability and validity of the positive and negative syndrome scale for schizophrenics. Psychiatry Res. 1988;23(1):99–110.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kirkpatrick B, Fenton WS, Carpenter WT, Marder SR. The NIMH-MATRICS consensus statement on negative symptoms. Schizophr Bull. 2006;32(2):214–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mathers C. The global burden of disease: 2004 update. World Health Organization; 2008.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meyer MB, Kurtz MM. Elementary neurocognitive function, facial affect recognition and social-skills in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2009;110(1):173–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Morrens M, Hulstijn W, Sabbe B. Psychomotor slowing in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2006;33(4):1038–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Evidence-based health policy—lessons from the global burden of disease study. Science. 1996;274(5288):740–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nuechterlein KH, Green MF, Kern RS, Baade LE, Barch DM, Cohen JD, Essock S, et al. The MATRICS consensus cognitive battery, part 1: test selection, reliability, and validity. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165(2):203–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rangaswamy T, Sujit J. Psychosocial rehabilitation in developing countries. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2012;24(5):499–503.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sánchez P, Peña J, Bengoetxea E, Ojeda N, Elizagárate E, Ezcurra J, Gutiérrez M. Improvements in negative symptoms and functional outcome after a new generation cognitive remediation program: a randomized controlled trial. Schizophr Bull. 2014;40(3):707–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Taksal A, Sudhir PM, Janakiprasad KK, Viswanath D, Thirthalli J. Feasibility and effectiveness of the integrated psychological therapy (IPT) in patients with schizophrenia: a preliminary investigation from India. Asian J Psychiatry. 2015;31(17):78–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tomczak M, Tomczak E. The need to report effect size estimates revisited An overview of some recommended measures of effect size. Trends Sport Sci. 2014;21:19–25.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wykes T, Huddy V, Cellard C, McGurk SR, Czobor P. A meta-analysis of cognitive remediation for schizophrenia: methodology and effect sizes. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168(5):472–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer (India) Private Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryInstitute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (IMHANS)Kozhikode (Calicut)India
  2. 2.Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (IMHANS)Kozhikode (Calicut)India
  3. 3.TATA Institute of Social Sciences (TISS)MumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations