Advertisement

Community Participation Among Individuals with Serious Mental Illnesses Leaving Jail

  • Amy Blank WilsonEmail author
  • Stacey L. Barrenger
  • Eugene Brusilovskiy
  • Jeffrey Draine
  • Mark S. Salzer
Original Article

Abstract

Studies have found that higher levels of community participation are associated with a number of positive outcomes such as increased recovery and quality of life. People with serious mental illnesses (SMI) leaving jail face a number of barriers that limit their ability to participate in community activities. In this paper we examine whether the combined experience of mental illness and recent discharge from jail furthers the community isolation that is already experienced by individuals with serious mental illnesses. This analysis found that people with SMI recently released from jail had significantly lower levels of community participation in terms of overall number of community participation days and activities, number of time spent in activities individuals identified as important, and on measures of sufficiency related to the time spent engaged in these activities. Community participation is a key component of community re-integration for people with SMI leaving jail. The results of this study show that services for people with SMI leaving jail need to include interventions that foster engagement in community based activities.

Keywords

Community participation Mental illnesses Incarceration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The contents of this publication were developed under a grant from the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR) grant H133B100037 (Salzer, Principal Investigator).  NIDRR is now the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR) within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents of this work do not necessarily represent the policy or indicate endorsement of any federal government agency.

References

  1. 1.
    Bond GR, Salyers MP, Rollings AL, Rapp CA, Zipple AM. How evidence-based practices contribute to community integration. Community Ment Health J. 2004;40(6):569–88.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Flynn R, Aubry T. Integration of persons with developmental or psychiatric disabilities: Conceptualization and measurement. In: Flynn RJ, Lemay R, editors. A Quarter-Century of Normalization and Social Role Valorization: Evolution and Impact. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press; 1999. p. 271–303.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Salzer MS, Baron RC, Menkir SMA, Breen L. Community integration practice: Promoting life in the community like everyone else. In: Nemec P, Furlong Norman K, editors. Best practices in psychiatric rehabilitation. McLean: United States Psychiatric Rehabilitation Association; 2014. p. 219–36.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Salzer MS, Baron RC. Community integration and measuring participation. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Collaborative on Community Integration. 2006. http://tucollaborative.org/pdfs/Toolkits_Monographs_Guidebooks/measuring_community_inclusion/CI_and_Measuring_Participation.pdf.
  5. 5.
    World Health Organization. (2001). ICF: International classification of functioning, disability, and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. 2001. http://www.who.int/entity/classifications/icf/icf_more/en/.
  6. 6.
    Salzer MS, Brusilovskiy E, Prvu-Bettger J, Kottsieper P. Measuring community participation of adults with psychiatric disabilities: Reliability of two modes of data collection. Rehabil Psychol. 2014;. doi: 10.1037/a0036002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaplan K, Salzer M, Brusilovskiy E. Community participation as a predictor of recover-oriented outcomes among emerging and mature adults with mental illnesses. Psych Rehabil J. 2012;35(3):219–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burns-Lynch W, Brusilovskiy E, Salzer MS. An empirical study of the relationship between community participation, recovery, and quality of life of individuals with serious mental illnesses. Israel J of Psych. 2016;53(1):46–55.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sampson RJ, Laub JH. Life-course desisters? Trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70. Criminology. 2003;41(3):555–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pogorzelski W, Wolff N, Pan K, Blitz C. Public health consequences of imprisonment: Behavioral health problems, ex-offender reentry policies, and the “Second Chance Act”. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:1718–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Uggen C, Manza J, Thompson M. Citizenship, democracy, and the civic reintegration of criminal offenders. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2006;605:281–312. doi: 10.1177/0002716206286898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pager D. Marked: Race, crime, and finding work in an era of mass incarceration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Binswanger IA, Stem MF, Deyo RA, Cheadle A, Elmore JG, Koepsell TD. Release from prison: A high risk of death for former inmates. New England J of Med. 2007;366:157–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pratt D, Piper M, Appleby L, Webb R, Shaw J. Suicide in recently released prisoners: a population-based cohort study. Lancet. 2006;368:119–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schnittker J. The psychological dimensions and social consequences of incarceration. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2014;2014(651):122–38. doi: 10.1177/0002716213502922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, Hergueta T, Baker R, Dunbar GC. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59(Suppl 20):22–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Salzer MS, Kottsieper P, Brusilovskiy E. Intermethod Reliability and Factors Affecting Recall with the Temple University Community Participation Measure. J Ment Health. 2015;24(4):189–95. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2015.1036976.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Welch BL. The generalization of “Student’s” problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika. 1947;34(1–2):28–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wilson BA. How people with mental illness seek help after release from jail. Qual Health Res. 2013;23(12):1575–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India Pvt. Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amy Blank Wilson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Stacey L. Barrenger
    • 2
  • Eugene Brusilovskiy
    • 3
  • Jeffrey Draine
    • 4
  • Mark S. Salzer
    • 5
  1. 1.School of Social WorkUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  2. 2.Silver School of Social Work, Ehrenkranz CenterNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health ProfessionsTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  4. 4.Department of Public HealthTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  5. 5.Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Temple University Collaborative On Community Inclusion of Individuals with Psychiatric DisabilitiesTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations