Advertisement

Influence of White Aluminum Dross on the Corrosion Resistance of Reinforcement Carbon Steel in Simulated Concrete Pore Solution

  • Roland Tolulope LotoEmail author
  • Ayobami Busari
Article
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

Recent research in concrete technology now focuses on partial replacement of cement using cost-effective, eco-friendly and sustainable wastes and admixtures. The effect of white aluminum dross (Al-D) at 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 25% weight concentration on the corrosion resistance of low carbon steel in simulated concrete pore solution was studied with potentiodynamic polarization technique and open circuit potential (OCP) measurement. Optical microscopy was used to analyze and compare the surface morphology of the steel specimens before and after the corrosion test. Results from electrochemical test showed Al-D in concrete admixture mildly increases the corrosion rate of the carbon steel with respect to Al-D concentration. Corrosion rate values of 3.00 × 102, 3.41 × 102 and 8.39 × 102 were obtained at 0%, 5% and 25% Al-D. Cathodic shift in corrosion potential was observed due to selective deterioration of the steel. However, potentiostatic data show the presence of Al-D extends the passivation range of the carbon steel, improving its pitting corrosion. OCP plots with and without shift significantly to positive values with respect to exposure time signifying formation of protective oxide on the carbon steel. Severe morphological deterioration in the form of corrosion pits are visible on steel surface from concrete pore electrolyte at 0% Al-D. Fewer and comparatively smaller corrosion pits are visible on the morphology of the steel from 5% Al-D pore electrolyte. The relative size of the corrosion pits decreased further from observation of the steel from pore solution at 25% Al-D.

Keywords

Corrosion Concrete Pitting Steel Aluminum 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Covenant University Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria, for the sponsorship and provision of research facilities for this project.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmad S (2003) Reinforcement corrosion in concrete structures, its monitoring and service life prediction—a review. Cem Concr Compos 25(4–5):459–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Biezma MV, San JR, Cristobal (2005) Methodology to study cost of corrosion. Corros Eng Sci Techno l40(4):344–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thangavel K (2004) The threshold limit for chloride corrosion of reinforced concrete. Corros Rev 22(1):55–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zheng H, Li W, Ma F, Kong Q (2012) The effect of a surface-applied corrosion inhibitor on the durability of concrete. Constr Build Mater 37:36–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bastidas DM, Criado M, Fajardo S, La Iglesia A, Bastidas JM (2015) Corrosion inhibition mechanism of phosphates for early-age reinforced mortar in the presence of chlorides. Cem Concr Compos 61:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Conciatori F, Laferrier E, Brruhwiler (2010) Comprehensive modeling of chloride ion and water ingress into concrete considering thermal and carbonation state for real climate. Cem Concr Res 40(1):109–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Etteyeb N, Novoa XR (2016) Inhibition effect of some trees cultivated in arid regions against the corrosion of steel reinforcement in alkaline chloride solution. Corros Sci 112:471–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Loto CA, Joseph OO, Loto RT (2013) Inhibition effect of Vernonia amygdalina extract on the corrosion of mild steel reinforcement in concrete in 0.2 M H2SO4 environment. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 17(10):1026–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Loto RT, Loto CA, Fedotova T (2014) Electrochemical studies of mild steel corrosion inhibition in sulfuric acid chloride by aniline. Res Chem Intermed 40(4):1501–1516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Loto CA, Loto RT (2013) Effect of dextrin and thiourea additives on the zinc electroplated mild steel in acid chloride solution. Int J Electrochem Sci 8(12):12434–12450Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    William HH (2014) Analytical evaluation of time-to-corrosion for chloride-exposed reinforced concrete with an admixed corrosion inhibitor: Part 1—no inhibitor egress. Corrosion 70(1):48–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tang SW, Yao Y, Andrade C, Li ZR (2015) Recent durability studies on concrete structure. Cem Concr Res 78:143–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ryu H, Singh JK, Lee H-S, Ismail MA, Park WJ (2017) Effect of LiNO2 inhibitor on corrosion characteristics of steel rebar in saturated Ca(OH)2 solution containing NaCl: an electrochemical study. Constr Build Mater 133:387–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moreno M, Morris W, Alvarez MG, Duffo GS (2004) Corrosion of reinforcing steel in simulated concrete pore solutions: effect of carbonation and chloride content. Corros Sci 46(11):2681–2699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kumar V (1998) Protection of steel reinforcement for concrete: a review. Corros Rev 16(4):317–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maslehuddin M, Al-Zahrani MM, Ibrahim M, Al-Mehthel MH, Al-Idi SH (2007) Effect of chloride concentration in soil on reinforcement corrosion. Constr Build Mater 21:1825–1832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hussain RR, Shuraim AB, Alhozaimy AMA (2015) Investigation for the impact of nature of coarse aggregate on the passive layer formation and corresponding corrosion of reinforcement bars in high performance concrete. Constr Build Mater 100:52–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wasim M, Hussain RR (2015) Passive film formation and corrosion initiation in lightweight concrete structures as compared to self-compacting and ordinary concrete structures at elevated temperature in chloride rich marine environment. Constr Build Mater 78:144–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Holloway L, Nairn K, Forsyth M (2004) Concentration monitoring and performance of a migratory corrosion inhibitor in steel-reinforced concrete. Cem Concr Res 34(8):1435–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ann KY, Song HW (2007) Chloride threshold level for corrosion of steel in concrete. Corros Sci 49:4113–4133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mennucci MM, Banczek EP, Rodrigues PRP, Costa I (2009) Evaluation of benzotriazole as corrosion inhibitor for carbon steel in simulated pore solution. Cem Concr Compos 31(6):418–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Huet B, L’Hostis V, Miserque F, Idrissi H (2005) Electrochemical behavior of mild steel in concrete: influence of pH and carbonate content of concrete pore solution. Electrochem Acta 51:172–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Eichler T, Burkert A, Beck M (2007) Electrochemical noise measurements on unalloyed steel in chloride-containing alkaline environment. Mater Corros 58:961–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang Y, Cheng G, Wu W, Qiao Q, Li Y, Li X (2015) Effect of pH and chloride on the micro-mechanism of pitting corrosion for high strength pipeline steel in aerated NaCl solutions. Appl Surf Sci 349:746–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Perez N (2016) Electrochemistry and corrosion science, 2nd edn. Springer, Boston.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24847-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shi J, Sun W, Jiang J, Zhang Y (2016) Influence of chloride concentration and pre-passivation on the pitting corrosion resistance of low-alloy reinforcing steel in simulated concrete pore solution. Constr Build Mater 111:805–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Luo H, Su H, Dong C, Xiao K, Li X (2015) Electrochemical and passivation behavior investigation of ferritic stainless steel in alkaline environment. Constr Build Mater 96:502–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Taveira LV, Montemor MF, Belo MDC, Ferreira MG, Dick LFP (2010) Influence of incorporated Mo and Nb on the Mott–Schottky behavior of anodic films formed on AISI 304L. Corros Sci 52:2813–2818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Marcotte TD (2001) Characterization of chloride-induced corrosion products that forms in steel reinforced cementitious materials. PhD Thesis, University of WaterlooGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kulik GJ, Daley JC (1990) Aluminum dross processing in the 90’s. In: 2nd International symposium—recycling of metals and engineered materials. TMS-AIME, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gwinner DS (1996) Environmental issues in the aluminum reclamation industry. In: IX international seminar on aluminum recycling discusses sustainability, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, p 40–51Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Peterson RD, Newton L (2002) Review of aluminum dross processing, light metals. TMS-AIME, WarrendaleGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Busari A, Akinmusuru J, Dahunsi B (2017) Mechanical properties of dehydroxylated kaolinitic clay in self-compacting concrete for pavement construction. Silicon.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-017-9654-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Puertas F, Blanco-Varela MT, Vazquez T (1999) Behaviour of cement mortars containing an industrial waste from aluminum refining. Cem Concr Res 29:1673–1680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ewais EMM, Khalil NM, Amin MS, Ahmed YMA, Barakat MA (2009) Utilization of aluminum sludge and aluminum slag (dross) for the manufacture of calcium aluminate cement. Ceram Int 35(8):3381–3388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Elinwa AU, Mbadike E (2011) The use of aluminum waste for concrete production. J Asian Archit Build Eng 10(1):217–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Arimanwa JI, Onwuka DO, Arimanwa MC, Onwuka US (2012) Prediction of the compressive strength of aluminum waste–cement concrete using Scheffe’s theory. J Mater Civil Eng 24(2):177–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    NIS 444-1:2003 composition, specification and conformity criteria for common cements. Standards Organization of NigeriaGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    NIS 11 (1974) Specification for ordinary Portland cement. Standards Organization of NigeriaGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mindess S, Young JF, Darwin D (2003) Concrete, 2nd edn. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ayobami Busari A, Akinmusuru J, Dahunsi B (2017) Mechanical properties of dehydroxylated kaolinitic clay in self-compacting concrete for pavement construction. Silicon.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-017-9654-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kulakowski MP (2002) Contribution to the study of carbonation in concretes and composite mortars with active silica addition. Doctoral Thesis. Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto AlegreGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ortolan VK, Mancio M, Tutikian BF (2016) Evaluation of the influence of the pH of concrete pore solution on the corrosion resistance of steel reinforcement. J Build Rehabil1:10.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-016-0011-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Darwin D, Browning JA, O’Reilly M, Xing L, Ji J (2009) Critical chloride corrosion threshold of galvanized reinforcing bars. ACI Mater J 106(2):176–183Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Moragues A, Macias A, Andrade C (1987) Equilibria of the chemical composition of the concrete pore solution. Part I: comparative study of synthetic and extracted solutions. Cem Concr Res 17(2):173–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Saremi M, Mahallati E (2002) A study on chloride-induced depassivation of mild steel in simulated concrete pore solution. Cem Concr Res 32:1915–1921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Andersson K, Allard B, Bengtsson M, Magnusson B (1989) Chemical composition of cement pore solutions. Cem Concr Res 19:327–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Blanco G, Bautista A, Takenouti H (2006) EIS study of passivation of austenitic and duplex stainless steels reinforcements in simulated pore solutions. Cem Concr Compos 28(3):212–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Monticelli C, Frignani A, Trabanelli G (2000) A study on corrosion inhibitors for concrete application. Cem Concr Res 30:635–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ormellese M, Berra M, Bolzoni F, Pastore T (2006) Corrosion inhibitors for chlorides induced corrosion in reinforced concrete structures. Cem Concr Res 36(3):536–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Morris W, Vico A, Vazquez M, DeSanchez S (2002) Corrosion of reinforcing steel evaluated by means of concrete resistivity measurements. Corros Sci 44(1):81–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Balytes OI, Krokhrnal’nylOO (1999) Pitting corrosion of 12Kh 18AG 18Sh steel in chloride solutions. Mater Sci 35(3):389–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Abd El-Haleem SM, Abd El-Wanees S (2011) Chloride induced pitting corrosion of nickel in alkaline solutions and its inhibition by organic amines. Mater Chem Phys 128(3):418–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringCovenant UniversityOtaNigeria
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringCovenant UniversityOtaNigeria

Personalised recommendations