Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Equivalence-Based Instruction to Improve Portion-Size Estimation with Different Vessels

Abstract

Obesity, which increases individuals’ risk for a variety of health problems and is associated with increased health-care expenses, is considered a public health concern due to the rapidly increasing rates of people who are considered obese (World Health Organization [WHO], 2018). One potential method for decreasing rates of obesity is to teach people how to more accurately estimate portion sizes to decrease the amount of calories they consume. Previous researchers successfully taught participants to accurately estimate portion sizes through equivalence-based instruction. The purpose of the present study was to teach healthy adults to estimate portion sizes using nonfood items and to assess generalization of the skill across a variety of vessels not associated with training (a small plate, bowl, and plastic bag). All participants demonstrated improved accuracy of portion size estimations following training with both the training vessel and the generalization vessels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in figshare at: https://figshare.com/articles/EBI_portion-size_estimation/10263263

References

  1. Albright, L., Schnell, L. K., Reeve, K. F., & Sidener, T. M. (2016). Using stimulus equivalence-based instruction to teach graduate students in applied behavior analysis to interpret operant functions of behavior. Journal of Behavioral Education, 25, 290–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-016-9249-0.

  2. Arntzen, E., Halstadtro, L., Bjerke, E., & Halstadtro, M. (2010). Training and testing music skills in a boy with autism using a matching-to-sample format. Behavioral Interventions, 25, 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.301.

  3. Arntzen, E., Halstadtro, L., Bjerke, E., Wittner, K. J., & Kristiansen, A. (2014). On the sequential and concurrent presentation of trials establishing prerequisites for emergent relations. Behavior Analyst Today, 14, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101280.

  4. Benton, D. (2015). Portion size: What we know and what we need to know. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 55, 988–1004. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2012.679980.

  5. Fields, L., Hobbie-Reeve, S. A., Reeve, K. F., & Adams, B. J. (1999). Effects pf training directionality and class size on equivalence class formation by adults. The Psychological Record, 49, 703–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395336.

  6. Fields, L., & Reeve, K. F. (2001). A methodological integration of generalized equivalence classes, natural categories, and cross-modal perception. The Psychological Record, 51, 67–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395387.

  7. Fields, L., & Verhave, T. (1987). The structure of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1987.48-317.

  8. Fienup, D. M., Covey, D. P., & Critchfield, T. S. (2010). Teaching brain-behavior relations economically with stimulus equivalence technology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43-19.

  9. Fienup, D. M., & Critchfield, T. S. (2011). Transportability of equivalence-based programmed instruction: Efficacy and efficiency in a college classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 435–450. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-435.

  10. Green, G. (2001). Behavior analytic instruction for learners with autism: Advances in stimulus control technology. Focus on Autism & Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/108835760101600203.

  11. Green, G., & Saunders, R. R. (1998). Stimulus equivalence. In K. A. Lattal & M. Perone (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in human operant behavior (pp. 229–262). New York: Plenum Press.

  12. Griffith, K. R., Ramos, A. L., Hill, K. E., & Miguel, C. F. (2018). Using equivalence-based instruction to teach piano skills to college students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 51, 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.438.

  13. Hankla, M. E., Kohn, C. S., & Normand, M. P. (2017). Teaching college students to pour accurately using behavioral skills training: Evaluation of the effects of peer modeling. Behavioral Interventions, 33, 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1509.

  14. Hausman, N. L., Borrero, J. C., Fisher, A., & Kahng, S. (2014). Improving accuracy of portion-size estimations through a stimulus equivalence paradigm. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.139.

  15. Hausman, N. L., Borrero, J. C., Fisher, A., & Kahng, S. (2016). Teaching young children to make accurate portion size estimations using a stimulus equivalence paradigm. Behavioral Interventions, 32, 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin1466.

  16. Keintz, K. S., Miguel, C. F., Kao, B., & Finn, H. E. (2011). Using conditional discrimination training to produce emergent relations between coins and their values in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 909–913. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-909.

  17. LeBlanc, L. A., Miguel, C. F., Cummings, A. R., Goldsmith, T. R., & Carr, J. E. (2003). The effects of three stimulus-equivalence testing conditions on emergent US geography relations of children diagnosed with autism. Behavioral Interventions, 18, 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.144.

  18. Marchiori, D., Corneille, O., & Klein, O. (2012). Container size influences snack food intake independently of portion size. Appetite, 58, 814–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.01.015.

  19. Ninness, C., Dixon, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., Rehfeldt, R. A., Rumph, R., McCuller, G., et al. (2009). Constructing and deriving reciprocal trigonometric relations: A functional analytic approach. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42-191.

  20. Regan, B., Vladescu, J. C., Reeve, K. R., & DeBar, R. M. (2018). Equivalence-based instruction with nonfood items to increase portion-size estimation accuracy. The Psychological Record, 68, 537–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-018-0299-7.

  21. Schnell, L. K., Sidener, T. M., DeBar, R. M., & Kahng, S. (2018). Effects of computer-based training on procedural modifications to standard functional analyses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 51, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.423.

  22. Trucil, L. M., Vladescu, J. C., Reeve, K. F., DeBar, R. D., & Schnell, L. K. (2015). Improving portion-size estimation using equivalence-based instruction. The Psychological Record, 65, 761–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-015-0146.

  23. Watson, P. J., & Workman, E. A. (1981). The non-concurrent multiple baseline across-individuals design: An extension of the traditional multiple baseline design. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 12, 257–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(81)90055-0.

  24. Williams, T. C., & Zahed, H. (1996). Computer-based training versus traditional lecture: Effect on learning and retention. Journal of Business and Psychology, 11, 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02193865.

  25. World Health Organization (WHO). (2018). Obesity and overweight. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Jason C. Vladescu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vladescu, J.C., Marano, K.E. & Reeve, K.F. Equivalence-Based Instruction to Improve Portion-Size Estimation with Different Vessels. Psychol Rec (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00388-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Equivalence-based instruction
  • Obesity
  • Portion-size estimation
  • Portion-size measurement aids
  • Stimulus equivalence