Advertisement

The Psychological Record

, Volume 68, Issue 2, pp 219–229 | Cite as

Acquisition of Complex Conditional Discriminations in a Child with Autism Spectrum Disorder

  • Colleen B. Yorlets
  • R. W. Maguire
  • Christina M. King
  • Megan Breault
Original Article

Abstract

Individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder have been reported to demonstrate stimulus overselectivity or restricted stimulus control (i.e., failure to respond to all critical elements of complex stimuli). This potential may have a detrimental impact on the acquisition of academic skills for these individuals if the stimuli in question contain multiple controlling elements. The current study presents a number of methodologies by which attention to, and the subsequent control by, multiple elements of a complex stimulus was demonstrated. The participant in this study was a 10-year-old girl diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. She was taught to select both printed word and picture comparisons, in the presence of complex sample stimuli comprised of visual and auditory elements, via an errorless learning protocol. Specifically, sample stimuli included manual American Sign Language (ASL) signs and the name of the sign. Following training, tests conducted in the absence of programed feedback verified accurate control by each sample element, as well as emergent stimulus-stimulus relations. No evidence of stimulus overselectivity was demonstrated during posttests. This study demonstrated an efficient methodology for forming stimulus classes through complex conditional discrimination training.

Keywords

Complex stimuli Stimulus overselectivity Conditional discriminations Autism Errorless learning 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Gretchen A. Dittrich for her insightful comments on this manuscript. Thank you also to Lillie Joyce and Abby Kupris for their assistance during the course of the study. These data were presented at the Association for Behavior Analysis International conference, 2016. The manuscript was completed by the first author in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the doctoral degree at Simmons College.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Carter, D. E., & Eckerman, D. A. (1975). Symbolic matching by pigeons: Rate of learning complex discriminations predicted from simple discriminations. Science, 187, 662–664.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1114318.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Chamel Elias, N., Goyos, C., Saunders, M., & Saunders, R. (2008). Teaching manual signs to adults with mental retardation using matching-to-sample procedures and stimulus equivalence. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 24, 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Dickson, C. A., Deutsch, C. K., Wang, S. S., & Dube, W. V. (2006). Matching-to-sample assessment of stimulus overselectivity in students with intellectual disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 111(6), 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[447:MAOSOI]2.0.CO;2.Google Scholar
  5. Doughty, A. H., & Hopkins, M. N. (2011). Reducing stimulus overselectivity through an increased observing-response requirement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 653–657.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-653.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Dube, W. V., & McIlvane, W. J. (1997). Reinforcer frequency and restricted stimulus control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 303–316.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1997.68-303.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Green, G. (2001). Behavior analytic instruction for learners with autism: Advances in stimulus control technology. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 72–85.  https://doi.org/10.1177/108835760101600203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Green, G., & Saunders, R. R. (1998). Stimulus equivalence. In K. A. Lattal & M. Perone (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in human operant behavior (pp. 229–262). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Groskreutz, N. C., Karsina, A., Miguel, C. F., & Groskreutz, M. P. (2010). Using complex auditory-visual samples to produce emergent relations in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43(1), 131–136.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43-131.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Guerrero, M., Alós, F. J., & Moriana, J. A. (2015). Emergent relations with compound stimuli in conditional and simple discriminations: An experimental application in children. The Psychological Record, 65, 465–486.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-015-0123-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haegele, K. M., McComas, J. J., Dixon, M., & Burns, M. K. (2011). Using a stimulus equivalence paradigm to teach numerals, English words, and Native American words to preschool-age children. Journal of Behavioral Education, 20, 283–296.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-011-9134-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hayashi, Y., & Vaidya, M. (2008). Effects of stimulus discriminability on the acquisition of conditional discriminations in adult humans. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 9, 173–183 Retrieved from http://www.ejoba.org/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Litrownik, A. J., McInnis, E. T., Wetzel-Pritchard, A., & Filipelli, D. L. (1978). Restricted stimulus control and inferred attentional deficits in autistic and retarded children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87(5), 554–562.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.87.5.554.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lovaas, O. I., Schreibman, L., Koegel, R., & Rehm, R. (1971). Selective responding by autistic children to multiple sensory input. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 77(3), 211–222.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Maguire, R. W., Stromer, R., Mackay, H. A., & Demis, C. A. (1994). Matching to complex samples and stimulus class formation in adults with autism and young children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(6), 753–772.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02172284.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ploog, B. O. (2010). Stimulus overselectivity four decades later: a review of the literature and its implications for current research in autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 1332–1349.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-0990-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Reed, S. R., Stahmer, A. C., Suhrheinrich, J., & Shreibman, K. (2013). Stimulus overselectivity in typical development: Implications for teaching children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 1249–1257.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1658-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ribeiro, D. M., Miguel, C. F., & Goyos, C. (2015). The effects of listener training on discriminative control by elements of compound stimuli in children with disabilities. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 104, 48–62.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.161.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Rosales, R., Maderitz, C., & Garcia, Y. A. (2014). Comparison of simple and complex auditory-visual conditional discrimination training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schreibman, L. (1975). Effects of within-stimulus and extra-stimulus prompting on discrimination learning in autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 91–112.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1975.8-91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Schreibman, L., Koegel, R. L., & Craig, M. S. (1978). Reducing stimulus overselectivity in autistic children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 5, 425–436.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00915090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5–13.  https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1401.05.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sidman, M. (1994). A giant step: Expanding classes of equivalent stimuli from three to four members. In Equivalence relations and behavior: a research story (pp. 224–226). Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative, Inc..Google Scholar
  24. Stromer, R., McIlvane, W. J., Dube, W. V., & Mackay, H. A. (1993). Assessing control by elements of complex stimuli in delayed matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59(1), 83–102.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1993.59-83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Stromer, R., & Stromer, J. B. (1990a). The formation of arbitrary stimulus classes in matching to complex samples. The Psychological Record, 40, 51–66 Retrieved from http://thepsychologicalrecord.siu.edu/index.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stromer, R. & Stromer, J. B. (1990b). Matching to complex samples: Further study of arbitrary stimulus classes. Psychological Record, 40, 505–516. Retrieved from http://thepsychologicalrecord.siu.edu/index.html
  27. Summers, J. A., Rincover, A., & Feldman, M. A. (1993). Comparison of extra- and within-stimulus prompting to teach prepositional discriminations to preschool children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 3, 287–298 Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/journal/10864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Template of State Shapes (n.d.). Retrieved from http://worldartsme.com/images/us-state-shapes-clipart-1.jpg.
  29. Terrace, H. S. (1963). Errorless transfer of a discrimination across two continua. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 223–232.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1963.6-223.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Colleen B. Yorlets
    • 1
    • 2
  • R. W. Maguire
    • 2
  • Christina M. King
    • 2
    • 3
  • Megan Breault
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.RCS Behavioral & Educational ConsultingNatickUSA
  2. 2.Department of Behavior AnalysisSimmons CollegeBostonUSA
  3. 3.RCS Learning CenterNatickUSA

Personalised recommendations