A Functional Analytic Approach to Understanding Disordered Gambling
The Gambling Functional Assessment (GFA) hypothesized four possible maintaining functions of gambling behavior, including social attention, escape from aversive events, access to tangible items, and sensory stimulation. In the years following the GFA’s release, research teams have argued for a revised model of the GFA to account for just two possible functions maintaining gambling behavior (positive and negative reinforcement). In the current study, we examined the extent to which a four-factor gambling functional assessment was possible, sustaining a conceptual and theoretical orientation consistent with a functional behavioral account of gambling. Three hundred and sixty-five recreational and disordered gamblers completed a demographic survey, the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS), and the GFA. An exploratory factor analysis was first conducted to determine GFA functional items that loaded onto a common factor, and a confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to determine if a four-factor model, consistent with the functional categories of the GFA, provided a good fit for the obtained data. Outcomes supported the model, suggesting that a four-factor functional account of gambling behavior can be obtained. Differing results obtained by separate research teams, however, suggest that more precise research may be needed in the development and analysis of functional instruments for use with gamblers.
KeywordsAddiction Behavior analysis Disordered gambling Gambling functional assessment
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modelling: adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 815-824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.018.
- Costello, A., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10, 1–9.Google Scholar
- Dixon, M. R., & Johnson, T. E. (2007). The gambling functional assessment (GFA): an assessment device for identification of the maintaining variables of pathological gambling. Analysis of Gambling Behavior, 1, 44–49.Google Scholar
- Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
- Gorsuch, R. L. (1990). Common factor analysis versus component analysis: Some well and little known facts. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 33–39.Google Scholar
- Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.Google Scholar
- Kim, S. W., Grant, J. E., Adson, D. E., & Young, C. S. (2001). Double-blind naltrexone and placebo comparison study in the treatment of pathological gambling. Biological Psychiatry, 49, 914–921.Google Scholar
- Shaffer, H. J., & Kidman, R. (Eds.). (2003). Shifting perspectives on gambling and addiction. Journal of Gambling Studies, 19, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021267028254.
- Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Weatherly, J. N., Terrell, H. K., & Bogenreif, D. (2013). Testing the internal consistency and construct validity of the gambling functional assessment–revised in a general-population sample. Modern Behavioral Science, 1, 37–48.Google Scholar
- Weatherly, J. N., Miller, J. C., & Terrell, H. K. (2011). Testing the construct validity of the gambling functional assessment–revised. Behavior Modification, 35, 553–569.Google Scholar