Manual-Observing Procedure: an Alternative to the Investigation of Stimulus Control and Equivalence Classes in Matching-to-Sample
This experiment presents a manual-observing procedure as an inexpensive alternative for investigating stimulus control and establishing equivalence classes in a matching-to-sample task (MTS). To illustrate the procedure, we evaluated the effects of different MTS training structures on observing responses and equivalence class formation. Participants had to press a button below each covered sample and comparison stimuli to reveal the stimulus. Four participants were exposed to two different sequences of the many-to-one (MTO) and one-to-many (OTM) procedures, using the manual-observing procedure during training and testing. The results showed that the manual-observing procedure allowed participants to acquire conditional discriminations and form equivalence classes, suggesting that the use of manual-observing responses in an MTS procedure is a useful procedure to evaluate stimulus control in an MTS task.
KeywordsManual-observing responses Matching-to-sample Equivalence class Training structures
This research was supported by a Doctoral scholarship to Paulo S. D. Soares-Filho (CAPES) and University of San Buenaventura Institutional Research Grant (2018), William F. Perez and Heloísa C. Campos (FAPESP) and Eliana I. M. Hamasaki (CNPq); scientific initiation scholarship to Lígia M. de Carvalho (CNPq/INCT-ECCE); and a Research Productivity Grant (CNPq) to Gerson Y. Tomanari. Paulo S. D. Soares Filho, William F. Perez, Heloísa C. Campos, Eliana I. M. Hamasaki, Lígia M. de Carvalho and Gerson Y. Tomanari are members of the National Institute of Science and Technology on Behavior, Cognition, and Teaching, supported by FAPESP (grant no. 08/57705-8) and CNPq (grant no. 573972/2008-7).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interests
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The ethics committee of the Psychology Institute at the University of São Paulo approved all procedures used in this experiment (#14026913.2.0000.5561).
The participation in this experiment was completely voluntary and an informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Arntzen, E., Grondahl, T., & Eilifsen, C. (2010). The effects of different training structures in the establishment of conditional discriminations and subsequent performance on tests for stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 60 , 437–462.Google Scholar
- Arntzen, E., & Holth, P. (2000). Equivalence outcome in single subjects as a function of training structure. The Psychological Record, 50 , 603–628.Google Scholar
- Ayres Pereira, V., & Arntzen, E. (2018). Effect of presenting baseline probes during or after emergent relations tests on equivalence class formation. The Psychological Record. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-018-0326-8.
- Dinsmoor, J. A., Mueller, K. L., Martin, L. T., & Bowe, C. A. (1982). The acquisition of observing. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 38(3), 249–263. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1347865/pdf/jeabehav00067-0023.pdf.Google Scholar
- Dube, W. V., Balsamo, L. M., Fowler, T. R., Dickson, C. A., Lombard, K. M., & Tomanari, G. Y. (2006). Observing behavior topography in delayed matching to multiple samples. Psychological Record, 56(2), 233–244 Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03395547.Google Scholar
- Dube, W. V., Lombard, K. M., Farrem, K. M., Flusser, D. S., Balsamo, L. M., Fowler, T. R., & Tomanari, G. Y. (2003). Stimulus overselectivity and observing behavior in individuals with mental retardation. In S. Soraci & K. Murata-Soraci (Eds.), Visual information processing (pp. 109–123). Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Hamasaki, E. I. M. (2009). Respostas de observação na tarefa de pareamento ao modelo: analisando topografias de controle de estímulos e seus efeitos sobre a formação de equivalência. São Paulo, Brazil: Universidade de São Paulo. Retrieved from www.teses.usp.br
- Holth, P., & Arntzen, E. (2000). Reaction times and the emergence of class consistent responding: A case for precurrent responding? The Psychological Record, 50 , 305–337.Google Scholar
- Sadeghi, P., & Arntzen, E. (2018). Eye-movements, training structures, and equivalence class formation. The Psychological Record, 68, 461–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-018-0290-3.
- Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative Retrieved from https://www.worldcat.org/title/equivalence-relations-and-behavior-a-research-story/oclc/260186817&referer=brief_results.Google Scholar
- Tomanari, G. Y. (2009). Resposta de observação: Uma reavaliação. Acta Comportamentalia, 17(3), 259–277.Google Scholar
- Tomanari, G. Y., & Capócio, V. (2008). Match! São Paulo, SP: Laboratório de Análise Experimental do Comportamento do Instituto de Psicologia da Universidade de São Paulo.Google Scholar
- Urcuioli, P. J., Zentall, T. R., & DeMarse, T. (1995). Transfer to derived sample-comparison relations by pigeons following many-to-one versus one-to-many matching with identical training relations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48(2), 158–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749508401445.Google Scholar
- Williams, B. A. (1994). Conditioned reinforcement: Experimental and theoretical issues. The Behavior Analyst, 17(2), 261–285.Google Scholar
- Wyckoff, L. B. (1952). The role of observing responses in discrimination learning—Part I. Psychological Review, 59, 431–442.Google Scholar
- Wyckoff, L. B. (1969). The role of observing responses in discrimination learning. In D. P. Hendry (Ed.), Conditioned reinforcement (pp. 237–260). Homewood: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar