Cooperation and Metacontingency in Pigeons
- 158 Downloads
Three pairs of pigeons were exposed to a procedure that combined features of classic studies on social behavior (cooperation) and recent studies that were inspired by the notion of metacontingency. We examined interactions between simultaneous demands for behavior of individual pigeons and interlocked behaviors of pairs of pigeons. The pigeons worked face to face in an operant conditioning box that was divided by a transparent wall. Each side of the box had two horizontally aligned response keys on the floor. Working individually, each pigeon produced 3-s access to food (individual consequence). In a subsequent phase, if the pigeons coordinated their responses, then they could produce food for an additional 4 s (mutual consequence). Initially, the individual consequence was produced on more than 75% of the trials. The interlocking pattern that was required to produce mutual consequences in the subsequent phase was observed on less than 50% of the trials for all pairs of pigeons. Adding the mutual contingency of reinforcement led to (a) a slight reduction of the production of individual and mutual consequences without any coordinated response pattern; (b) the maintenance of high percentages of individual consequences with a concomitant increase in mutual consequences; and (c) for only one subject, an increase in the production of mutual consequences that were accompanied by a decrease in the rate of individual consequences. We discuss the ways in which cooperation and metacontingency experiments should be integrated, the ways in which interlocking behaviors of nonhuman animals can be generated, and the role of verbal behavior in the emergence of cooperation and cultural processes.
KeywordsSocial behavior Cooperation Mutual reinforcement Cultural selection Metacontingency Pigeons
This research was supported by a postdoctoral scholarship (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo [FAPESP]) awarded to Saulo Missiaggia Velasco and by research support (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico [CNPq]) awarded to Gerson Yukio Tomanari. During article preparation, Angelo A. S. Sampaio was a student at the University of São Paulo with a doctoral scholarship (CNPq). Marcelo Frota Lobato Benvenuti and Gerson Yukio Tomanari are members of the National Institute of Science and Technology on Behavior, Cognition, and Teaching, supported by FAPESP (Grant 08/57705-8) and CNPq (Grant 573972/2008-7). The authors wish to thank Artur Nagae (at that time, an undergraduate student with a scientific initiation scholarship from FAPESP) for programming the software used to collect data and for helping with data collection.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All of the animal procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution at which the study was conducted.
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there are no conflicts of interest.
- Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2005). The origin and evolution of cultures. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Carrara, K., & Zilio, D. (2015). Análise comportamental da cultura: Contingência ou metacontingência como unidade de análise? [Behavioral analysis of culture: Contingency or metacontingency as the unit of analysis?]. Revista Brasileira de Análise do Comportamento, 11, 135–146.Google Scholar
- Catania, A. C. (2013). Learning (5th ed.). Cornwall-on-Hudson, NY: Sloan Publishing.Google Scholar
- Cohen, D. J., & Lindsley, O. R. (1964). Catalysis of controlled leadership in cooperation by human stimulation. Journal of Child Psychological Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 5, 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1964.tb02134.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Glenn, S. S. (1986). Metacontingencies in Walden Two. Behavior Analysis and Social Action, 5, 2–8.Google Scholar
- Glenn, S. S. (1991). Contingencies and metacontingencies: Relations among behavioral, cultural, and biological evolution. In P. A. Lamal (Ed.), Behavioral analysis of societies and cultural practices (pp. 39–73). New York: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
- Heyes, C. M., & Galef Jr., B. G. (1996). Social learning in animals: The roots of culture. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Hunter, C. S. (2012). Analyzing behavioral and cultural selection contingencies. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 44, 43–54.Google Scholar
- Marwell, G., & Schmitt, D. R. (1975). Cooperation: An experimental analysis. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Pavanelli, S., Leite, F. L., & Tourinho, E. Z. (2014). A “modelagem” de contingências comportamentais complexas [The “shaping” of complex interlocking behavioral contingencies]. Acta Comportamentalia, 22, 425–440.Google Scholar
- Sampaio, A. A. S., Araújo, L. A. S., Gonçalo, M. E., Ferraz, J. C., Alves-Filho, A. P., Brito, I. S., et al. (2013). Exploring the role of verbal behavior in a new experimental task for the study of metacontingencies. Behavior and Social Issues, 22, 87–101. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v22i0.4180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sampaio, A. A. S., Ottoni, E. B., & Benvenuti, M. F. (2015). A análise do comportamento no contexto do estudo evolucionista do comportamento social e da cultura [Behavior analysis in the context of the evolutionary study of social behavior and culture]. Estudos de Psicologia, 20, 127–138. https://doi.org/10.5935/1678-4669.20150015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Todorov, J. C. (2012). Metacontingências e a análise comportamental de práticas culturais [Metacontingencies and the behavioral analysis of cultural practices]. Clínica & Cultura, 1, 36–45.Google Scholar
- Toledo, T. F. N., Benvenuti, M. F. L., Sampaio, A. A. S., Marques, N. S., Cabral, P. A. A., Araújo, L. A. S., et al. (2015). Free culturant: a software for the experimental study of behavioral and cultural selection. Psychology & Neuroscience, 8, 366–384. https://doi.org/10.1037/pne0000016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar