Advertisement

The Psychological Record

, Volume 67, Issue 4, pp 537–545 | Cite as

Cooperation and Metacontingency in Pigeons

  • Saulo Missiaggia VelascoEmail author
  • Marcelo Frota Lobato Benvenuti
  • Angelo A. S. Sampaio
  • Gerson Yukio Tomanari
Original Article

Abstract

Three pairs of pigeons were exposed to a procedure that combined features of classic studies on social behavior (cooperation) and recent studies that were inspired by the notion of metacontingency. We examined interactions between simultaneous demands for behavior of individual pigeons and interlocked behaviors of pairs of pigeons. The pigeons worked face to face in an operant conditioning box that was divided by a transparent wall. Each side of the box had two horizontally aligned response keys on the floor. Working individually, each pigeon produced 3-s access to food (individual consequence). In a subsequent phase, if the pigeons coordinated their responses, then they could produce food for an additional 4 s (mutual consequence). Initially, the individual consequence was produced on more than 75% of the trials. The interlocking pattern that was required to produce mutual consequences in the subsequent phase was observed on less than 50% of the trials for all pairs of pigeons. Adding the mutual contingency of reinforcement led to (a) a slight reduction of the production of individual and mutual consequences without any coordinated response pattern; (b) the maintenance of high percentages of individual consequences with a concomitant increase in mutual consequences; and (c) for only one subject, an increase in the production of mutual consequences that were accompanied by a decrease in the rate of individual consequences. We discuss the ways in which cooperation and metacontingency experiments should be integrated, the ways in which interlocking behaviors of nonhuman animals can be generated, and the role of verbal behavior in the emergence of cooperation and cultural processes.

Keywords

Social behavior Cooperation Mutual reinforcement Cultural selection Metacontingency Pigeons 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a postdoctoral scholarship (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo [FAPESP]) awarded to Saulo Missiaggia Velasco and by research support (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico [CNPq]) awarded to Gerson Yukio Tomanari. During article preparation, Angelo A. S. Sampaio was a student at the University of São Paulo with a doctoral scholarship (CNPq). Marcelo Frota Lobato Benvenuti and Gerson Yukio Tomanari are members of the National Institute of Science and Technology on Behavior, Cognition, and Teaching, supported by FAPESP (Grant 08/57705-8) and CNPq (Grant 573972/2008-7). The authors wish to thank Artur Nagae (at that time, an undergraduate student with a scientific initiation scholarship from FAPESP) for programming the software used to collect data and for helping with data collection.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All of the animal procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution at which the study was conducted.

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Azrin, N. H., & Lindsley, O. R. (1956). The reinforcement of cooperation between children. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 100–102.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baum, W. M. (2000). Being concrete about culture and cultural evolution. In N. Thompson & F. Tonneau (Eds.), Perspectives in ethology, volume 13: Evolution, culture, and behavior (pp. 181–212). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2005). The origin and evolution of cultures. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Carrara, K., & Zilio, D. (2015). Análise comportamental da cultura: Contingência ou metacontingência como unidade de análise? [Behavioral analysis of culture: Contingency or metacontingency as the unit of analysis?]. Revista Brasileira de Análise do Comportamento, 11, 135–146.Google Scholar
  5. Catania, A. C. (2013). Learning (5th ed.). Cornwall-on-Hudson, NY: Sloan Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, D. J., & Lindsley, O. R. (1964). Catalysis of controlled leadership in cooperation by human stimulation. Journal of Child Psychological Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 5, 119–137.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1964.tb02134.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gimenes, L. S. (2016). An animal model to study metacontingencies. Revista Brasileira de Análise do Comportamento, 12, 8–9.  10.18542/rebac.v12i1.4020.Google Scholar
  8. Glenn, S. S. (1986). Metacontingencies in Walden Two. Behavior Analysis and Social Action, 5, 2–8.Google Scholar
  9. Glenn, S. S. (1991). Contingencies and metacontingencies: Relations among behavioral, cultural, and biological evolution. In P. A. Lamal (Ed.), Behavioral analysis of societies and cultural practices (pp. 39–73). New York: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
  10. Glenn, S. S. (2003). Operant contingencies and the origins of cultures. In K. A. Lattal & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Behavior theory and philosophy (pp. 223–242). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Glenn, S. S. (2004). Individual behavior, culture, and social change. Behavior Analyst, 27, 133–151.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Glenn, S. S., Malott, M. E., Andery, M. A. P. A., Benvenuti, M., Houmanfar, R. A., Sandaker, I., et al. (2016). Toward consistent terminology in a behaviorist approach to cultural analysis. Behavior and Social Issues, 25, 11–27.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v25i0.6634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Herrnstein, R. J. (1961). Relative and absolute strength of responses as a function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 267–272.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Heyes, C. (2012a). Grist and mills: On the cultural origins of cultural learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367, 2181–2191.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heyes, C. (2012b). What’s social about social learning? Journal of Comparative Psychology, 126, 193–202.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025180.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Heyes, C. M., & Galef Jr., B. G. (1996). Social learning in animals: The roots of culture. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Houmanfar, R. A., Alavosius, M. P., Morford, Z. H., Herbst, S. A., & Reimer, D. (2015). Functions of organizational leaders in cultural change: financial and social well-being. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 35, 4–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hunter, C. S. (2012). Analyzing behavioral and cultural selection contingencies. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 44, 43–54.Google Scholar
  19. Krispin, J. V. (2016). What is the metacontingency? Deconstructing claims of emergence and cultural-level selection. Behavior and Social Issues, 25, 28–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Malott, M. (2016). Selection of business practices in the midst of evolving complexity. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 36, 2–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Malott, M., & Glenn, S. (2006). Targets of intervention in cultural and behavioral change. Behavior and Social Issues, 15, 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marwell, G., & Schmitt, D. R. (1975). Cooperation: An experimental analysis. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  23. Mesoudi, A. (2011). Cultural evolution: How Darwinian theory can explain human culture and synthesize the social sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mithaug, D. E., & Burgess, R. L. (1968). The effects of different reinforcement contingencies in the development of social cooperation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 6, 402–426.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Pavanelli, S., Leite, F. L., & Tourinho, E. Z. (2014). A “modelagem” de contingências comportamentais complexas [The “shaping” of complex interlocking behavioral contingencies]. Acta Comportamentalia, 22, 425–440.Google Scholar
  26. Saconatto, A. T., & Andery, M. A. P. A. (2013). Seleção por metacontingências: Um análogo experimental de reforçamento negativo [Selection by metacontingencies: an experimental analog of negative reinforcement]. Interação em Psicologia, 17, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sampaio, A. A. S., Araújo, L. A. S., Gonçalo, M. E., Ferraz, J. C., Alves-Filho, A. P., Brito, I. S., et al. (2013). Exploring the role of verbal behavior in a new experimental task for the study of metacontingencies. Behavior and Social Issues, 22, 87–101.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v22i0.4180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sampaio, A. A. S., Ottoni, E. B., & Benvenuti, M. F. (2015). A análise do comportamento no contexto do estudo evolucionista do comportamento social e da cultura [Behavior analysis in the context of the evolutionary study of social behavior and culture]. Estudos de Psicologia, 20, 127–138.  https://doi.org/10.5935/1678-4669.20150015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Saunders, R. R., & Green, G. (1999). A discrimination analysis of training-structure effects on stimulus equivalence outcomes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 72, 117–137.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Saunders, R. R., & Spradlin, J. E. (1989). Conditional discrimination in mentally retarded adults: the effect of training the component simple discriminations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 1–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Schmitt, D. R. (1998). Social behavior. In K. A. Lattal & M. Perone (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in human operant behavior (pp. 471–505). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schmitt, D. R., & Marwell, G. (1968). Stimulus control in the experimental study of cooperation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 571–574.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  34. Skinner, B. F. (1962). Two synthetic social relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5, 531–533.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Skinner, B. F. (1981). Selection by consequences. Science, 213, 501–504.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7244649.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Smaldino, P. E. (2014). The cultural evolution of emergent group-level traits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37, 243–254.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13001544.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Tan, L., & Hackenberg, T. D. (2016). Functional analysis of mutual behavior in laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 130, 13–23.  https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Todorov, J. C. (2010). Schedules of cultural selection: Comments on “emergence and metacontingency”. Behavior and Social Issues, 19, 86–89.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v19i0.3221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Todorov, J. C. (2012). Metacontingências e a análise comportamental de práticas culturais [Metacontingencies and the behavioral analysis of cultural practices]. Clínica & Cultura, 1, 36–45.Google Scholar
  40. Toledo, T. F. N., Benvenuti, M. F. L., Sampaio, A. A. S., Marques, N. S., Cabral, P. A. A., Araújo, L. A. S., et al. (2015). Free culturant: a software for the experimental study of behavioral and cultural selection. Psychology & Neuroscience, 8, 366–384.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pne0000016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tomasello, M. (2016). The ontogeny of cultural learning. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Velasco, S. M., Benvenuti, M. F., & Tomanari, G. Y. (2012). Metacontingencies, experimentation and nonhumans: searching for conceptual and methodological advances. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 44, 25–34.  10.14349/Rlp.v44i1.926.Google Scholar
  43. Vichi, C., Andery, M. A. P. A., & Glenn, S. S. (2009). A metacontingency experiment: the effects of contingent consequences on patterns of interlocking contingencies reinforcement. Behavior and Social Issues, 18, 41–57.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v18i1.2292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saulo Missiaggia Velasco
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marcelo Frota Lobato Benvenuti
    • 2
    • 3
  • Angelo A. S. Sampaio
    • 2
    • 4
  • Gerson Yukio Tomanari
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Centro Paradigma de Ciências e Tecnologia do ComportamentoSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Instituto de PsicologiaUniversidade de São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  3. 3.Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia sobre Comportamento, Cognição e EnsinoSão CarlosBrazil
  4. 4.Colegiado de PsicologiaUniversidade Federal do Vale do São FranciscoPetrolinaBrazil

Personalised recommendations