Advertisement

The Psychological Record

, Volume 64, Issue 2, pp 261–269 | Cite as

Using a Visual Analogue Scale to Assess Delay, Social, and Probability Discounting of an Environmental Loss

  • Brent A. Kaplan
  • Derek D. Reed
  • Todd L. McKerchar
Original Article

Abstract

As anthropogenic influences on climate change become more readily apparent, the role of behavioral science in understanding barriers to sustainable actions cannot be overstated. Environmental psychologists have proposed that some major barrier to sustainability are the delayed, socially distant, and probabilistic effects of public policy efforts aimed at preserving Earth’s resources. This proposal places sustainability squarely within the research topic of delay, social, and probability discounting – processes well known to behavioral scientists. To date, there has been surprisingly little behavioral research examining the role of discounting processes in environmental decision making. In the present study, we examined the degree to which simple hyperbolic models of discounting can describe college students’ ratings of concern and their willingness to act in the face of an environmental loss. Findings suggest that hyperbolic models of delay, social, and probability discounting adequately describe these self-report data. Interestingly, but sadly unsurprisingly, ratings of willingness to act were discounted more steeply than concern across delay, social, and probability discounting tasks. A greater understanding of the behavioral processes associated with sustainability can inform better public policy efforts and may bridge the gap between environmental psychology and behavior analysis.

Keywords

Behavioral economics Delay discounting Environmental psychology Probability discounting Social discounting Sustainability 

References

  1. de Wit, H., Flory, J. D., Acheson, A., McCloskey, M., & Manuck, S. B. (2007). IQ and nonplanning impulsivity are independently associated with delay discounting in middle-aged adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 111–121. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.06.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Du, W., Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2002). Cross-cultural comparisons of discounting delayed and probabilistic rewards. The Psychological Record, 52, 479–492.Google Scholar
  3. Estle, S. J., Green, L., Myerson, J., & Holt, D. D. (2007). Discounting of monetary and directly consumable rewards. Psychological Science, 18, 58–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01849.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction: psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 66, 290–302. doi: 10.1037/a0023566.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gifford, R., Scannell, L., Kormos, C., Smolova, L., Biel, A., Boncu, S., et al. (2009). Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessments: an 18-nation study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2004). A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 769–792. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.769.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Green, L., Fry, A. F., & Myerson, J. (1994). Discounting of delayed rewards: a life-span comparison. Psychological Science, 5, 33–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00610.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Green, L., Myerson, J., Lichtman, D., Rosen, S., & Fry, A. (1996). Temporal discounting in choice between delayed rewards: the role of age and income. Psychology and Aging, 11, 79–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248. doi: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hardisty, D. J., & Weber, E. U. (2009). Discounting future green: money versus the environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 329–340. doi: 10.1037/a0016433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hendrickx, L., & Nicolaij, S. (2004). Temporal discounting and environmental risks: the role of ethical and loss-related concerns. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 409–422. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson, M. W., & Bruner, N. R. (2012). The sexual discounting task: HIV risk behavior and the discounting of delayed sexual rewards in cocaine dependence. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 123, 15–21. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.09.032.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson, M. W., & Bruner, N. R. (2013). Test-retest reliability and gender differences in the sexual discounting task among cocaine-dependent individuals. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 21, 277–286. doi: 10.1037/a0033071.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jones, B., & Rachlin, H. (2006). Social discounting. Psychological Science, 17, 283–286. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01699.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jones, B., & Rachlin, H. (2009). Delay, probability, and social discounting in a public goods game. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 91, 61–73. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2009.91-61.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaufman, D. S., Schneider, D. P., McKay, N. P., Ammann, C. M., Bradley, R. S., Briffa, K. R., et al. (2009). Recent warming reverses long-term arctic cooling. Science, 325, 1236. doi: 10.1126/science.1173968.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Koffarnus, M. N., Jarmolowicz, D. P., Mueller, E. T., & Bickel, W. K. (2013). Changing delay discounting in the light of the competing neurobehavioral decision systems theory: a review. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 99, 32–57. doi: 10.1002/jeab.2.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Locey, M. L., Jones, B. A., & Rachlin, H. (2013). Self-control and altruism. In G. J. Madden (Ed.), Handbook of behavior analysis (pp. 463–481). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  19. MacKillop, J., Amlung, M. T., Pryor, L. R., Ray, L. A., Sweet, L. H., & Munafo, M. R. (2011). Delayed reward discounting and addictive behavior: a meta-analysis. Psychopharmacology, 216, 305–321. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2229-0.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Madden, G. J., & Bickel, W. K. (Eds.). (2010). Impulsivity: The behavioral and neurological science of discounting. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  21. Mann, M. E. (2012). The hockey stick and the climate wars: Dispatches from the front lines. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Mann, M. E., Bradley, R. S., & Hughes, M. K. (1998). Global-scale temperature patterns and climate forcing over the past six centuries. Nature, 392, 779–787. doi: 10.1038/nature02478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mazur, J. E. (1987). An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In M. L. Commons, J. E. Mazur, J. A. Nevin, & H. Rachlin (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol. 5. The effect of delay and intervening events on reinforcement value (pp. 55–73). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  24. Mazur, J. E. (2004). Risky choice: selecting between certain and uncertain outcomes. The Behavior Analyst Today, 5, 190–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mazur, J. E., & Biondi, D. R. (2009). Delay-amount tradeoffs in choices by pigeons and rats: hyperbolic versus exponential discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 91, 197–211. doi: 10.1901/ jeab.2009.91-197.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. McKerchar, T. L., & Renda, C. R. (2012). Delay and probability discounting in humans: an overview. The Psychological Record, 62, 817–834.Google Scholar
  27. Odum, A. L., & Baumann, A. A. L. (2010). Delay discounting: State and trait variable (pp. 39-65). In G. J. Madden & W. K. Bickel (Eds.), Impulsivity: The behavioral and neurological science of discounting. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  28. Odum, A. L., Madden, G. J., & Bickel, W. K. (2002). Discounting of delayed health gains and losses by current, never- and ex-smokers of cigarettes. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 4, 295–303. doi: 10.1080/14622200210141257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ohmura, Y., Takahashi, T., & Kitamura, N. (2005). Discounting delayed and probabilistic monetary gains and losses by smokers of cigarettes. Psychopharmacology, 182, 508–515. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0110-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Olson, E. A., Hooper, C. J., Collins, P., & Luciana, M. (2007). Adolescents’ performance on delay and probability discounting tasks: contributions of age, intelligence, executive functioning, and self-reported externalizing behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1886–1897. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.06.016.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pachauri, R. K., & Reisinger, A. (Eds.). (2007). Climate Change 2007: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC.Google Scholar
  32. Rachlin, H., & Jones, B. A. (2008). Social discounting and delay discounting. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20, 1–15. doi: 10.1002/bdm.567.Google Scholar
  33. Rachlin, H., Raineri, A., & Cross, D. (1991). Subjective probability and delay. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55, 233–244. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-233.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Rosenzweig, C., Karoly, D., Vicarelli, M., Neofotis, P., Wu, Q., Casassa, G., et al. (2008). Attributing physical and biological impacts to anthropogenic climate change. Nature, 453, 353–358. doi: 10.1038/nature06937.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Scheres, A., Dijkstra, M., Ainslie, E., Balkan, J., Reynolds, B., Sonuga-Barka, E., et al. (2006). Temporal and probabilistic discounting of rewards in children and adolescents: effects of age and ADHD symptoms. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2092–2103. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.10.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Shead, N. W., & Hodgins, D. C. (2009). Probability discounting of gains and losses: implications for risk attitudes and impulsivity. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 92, 1–16. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2009.92-1.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Thompson, L. G. (2010). Climate change: the evidence and our options. The Behavior Analyst, 33, 153–170.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Weatherly, J. N., Plumm, K. M., & Derenne, A. (2011). Delay discounting and social policy issues. The Psychological Record, 61, 527–546.Google Scholar
  39. Wewers, M. E., & Lowe, N. K. (1990). A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Research in Nursing & Health, 13, 227–236. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770130405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Whelan, R., & McHugh, L. A. (2010). Temporal discounting of hypothetical monetary rewards by adolescents, adults, and older adults. The Psychological Record, 59, 247–258.Google Scholar
  41. Yoon, J. H., & Higgins, S. T. (2008). Turning k on its head: comments on use of an ED50 in delay discounting research. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 95, 169–172. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.12.011.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brent A. Kaplan
    • 1
  • Derek D. Reed
    • 1
  • Todd L. McKerchar
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Applied Behavioral ScienceUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA
  2. 2.Jacksonville State UniversityJacksonvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations