Black Alder (Alnus glutinosa L.)—a Resource for Value-Added Products in Furniture Industry Under European Screening

  • Emilia-Adela SalcaEmail author
Wood Structure and Function (A Koubaa, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Wood Structure and Function


Purpose of Review

The furniture sector worldwide is rapidly developing and diversifying. The furniture market faces nowadays a competition between various composites and solid wood furniture which is more reliable and environmentally-friendly. Various valuable species, such as oak, ash, and cherry, in addition to other common hardwood and softwood species are chosen by small- or medium-sized furniture companies. Due to its workability, properties, and appearance, black alder can be considered a suitable material for furniture manufacturing. This review offers an outline of the potential of black alder as a wood resource with an emphasis on applications in the furniture industry.

Recent Findings

Results from recent studies that have focused on active silviculture, uses, wood properties, color changes under air and light exposure, surface quality of processed surfaces during milling and sanding, coating properties, and process optimization are presented. Findings of these studies would help for practical applications so that this wood species can be processed more efficiently for value-added products with enhanced surfaces, improved appearance, and extended service life.


Black alder as an under-utilized wood species has been shown to have good potential for the wood industry so that its use can successfully reduce import activities of other species and value-added furniture products can be manufactured. For further studies, the properties of plywood made of densified veneers, surface wettability, and coating performance of such products should be evaluated for the furniture industry.


Black Alder Air oxidation Color changes Heat treatment Processing optimization Coating performance 



The author hereby acknowledge the support offered by the Fulbright Senior Award Program, Asia Bridge Program, and Transilvania University Fellowship 2015 to perform a main part of the scientific research presented within this review.


Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Bibalani GH, Bazhrang Z, Mohsenifar H, Joodi L. The side roots pulling effect of alder (Alnus glutinosa) on river bank soil strong in North Iran. Int J Bot. 2008;4:290–6.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    • Claessens H, Oosterbaan A, Saill P, Dondeux J. A review of the characteristics of black alder (Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.) and their implications for silvicultural practices. Forestry. 2010;83(2):163–75. This review presents a valuable synthesis of existing knowledge about the silviculture of black alder on suitable sites in relation to the production of high-quality wood.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mingeot D, Husson C, Mertens P, Watillon B, Bertin P, Druart P. Genetic diversity and genetic structure of black alder (Alnus glutinosa L. Gaertn) in the Belgium-Luxembourg-France cross-border area. Tree Genet Genomes 2016:12–24.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roussillat, M. L’ Aulne, Actes Sud, 2001.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Demirbas A. Conversion of black alder (Alnus glutinosa L.) in supercritical solvents. Energy Sources, Part A. 2006;38(10):1393–9. Scholar
  6. 6.
    King RA, Ferris C. Chloroplast DNA phylogeography of Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn. Mol Ecol. 1998;7:1151–61.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Funk DT. Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn. European Alder, agriculture handbook. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; 1990. p. 239–56.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sopp L. Fatömeg – szamitazi tablazatok. Budapest, Hungary: Mezögazdasagi Kiado; 1974.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Giurgiu V, Draghiciu D. Modele matematico-auxologice si tabele de productie pentru arborete. Bucuresti, Romania: Editura Ceres; 2004.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bolea V, Chira D, Vasile D, Ienasoiu G, Lesan M, Pop M, et al. Optimization of ecological functions of alder stands in protected area of Prejmer. Journal of Silviculture and hunting (Revista de silvicultura si cinegetica). 2013;18(32):28–39.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aosaar J, Uri V. Biomass production of grey alder, hybrid alder and silver birch stands on abandoned agricultural land. Forestry Studies Metsanduslikud Uurimused. 2008;48:53–66.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lazdiņa D, Liepins K, Bardule A, Liepins J, Bardulis A. Wood ash and wastewater sludge recycling success in fast-growing deciduous tree – birch and alder plantations. Agron Res. 2013;11(2):347–56.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Karaszewski Z, Mederski PS, Bembenek M, Giefing DF, Sawicka K, Gierszewska M. Factors affecting the timber quality of black alder (Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.). Ann. WULS - SGGW Wood Technol. 2015;89:70–5.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marinsek A, Kutnar L. Occurrence of invasive alien plant species in the floodplain forests along the Mura River in Slovenia. Period Biol. 2017;119(4):251–60. Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cubry P, Gallagher E, O’Connor E, Kelleher CT. Phylogeography and population genetics of black alder (Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.) in Ireland: putting it in a European context. Tree Genet Genomes. 2015;11:99. Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ayan S, Yahyaoglu Z, Gercek V, Sahin A, Sivacioglu A. The vegetative propagation of black alder (Alnus glutinosa susp. Barbata C. A. Mey Yalt.) by softwood cuttings. Pak J Biol Sci. 2006;9(2):238–42.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mac VD. Alnus glutinosa (L) Gaertn. J Ecol. 1953;41:447–66.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Durrant HT, de Rigo D, Caudullo G. Alnus glutinosa in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats. In: San-Miguel-Ayanz J, de Rigo D, Caudullo G, Houston Durrant T, Mauri A, editors. European Atlas of forest tree species. Luxembourg: Publ. Off. EU; 2016. e01f3c0+.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hendrickson O, Burgess D, Perinet P, Tremblay F, Chatatpaul L. Effects of Frankia on field performance of Alnus clones and seedlings. Plant Soil. 1993;150:95–302.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vares A, Lohmus K, Truu M, Truu J, Tullus H, Kanal A. Productivity of black alder (Alnus glutinosa 5L Gaertn.) plant on reclaimed oil-shale mining detritus and mineral soils in relation to rhizosphere conditions. Goryuchiye Slantsy. 2004;21(1):43–58.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stochlova P, Novotna K, Cerny K. Variation in Alnus glutinosa susceptibility to Phytophthora 3alni infection and its geographic pattern in the Czech Republic. For Path. 2016;46:3–10. Scholar
  22. 22.
    Klaassen RKWM. Creemers JGM. J Cult Herit. 2012;13:S123–8.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guz NR, Lorenz P, Métraux JP. Oregonin from the bark of European Alnus species. Biochem Syst Ecol. 2002;30(5):471–4.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Roze L, Bikovens O, Telysheva G. Determination and separation of diarylheptanoids from Alder growing in Latvia. In: Environment, technology, resources, proceedings of the 8th International Scientific and Practical Conference, vol. 1; 2011. p. 329–32. Scholar
  25. 25.
    Klaric M, Pervan S, Biosic M. Influence of Lyophilisation and Oven-Drying on Extraction Yield of Oregonin from European black alder (Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.) Bark. Drv Ind. 2017;68(3):205–10.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Filipovici J. Study on wood (Studiul lemnului), Publishing House Bucharest (Editura didactică şi pedagogică Bucureşti) 1965.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wagenfuhr R. Holzatals. 4th Edition. 1996.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Knaggs G, Xenopoulou S. Guide to Irish hardwoods. National Council for Forest Research and Development, Dublin, Ireland: Coford; 2004.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Davis E. Machining and related characteristics of United States Hardwoods, Forest Products Laboratory maintained at Madison, Wis., in cooperation with the University of Wisconsin Technical Bulletin No. 1267 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Washington, D.C. 1962.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sell J, Kropf F. Proprietes et caracteristiques des essences de bois. Le Mont, Suisse: Lignum; 1990.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Andersone I, Andersons B, et al. 1998. Investigation of the structure, composition and sorption properties of alder (Alnus) wood. In: Proceedings of the Fifth European Workshop on Lignocellulosics and Pulp 1998:41–44.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Salca EA, Gobakken RL, Gjerdrum P. Progress of discoloration in green, freshly cut veneer sheets of black alder (Alnus glutinosa L.) wood. Wood Mater SciEng J. 2015;10(2):178–84. Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hurtfiord BF, Luthi R. (1981) Chemistry of oregonin. Chemistry and morphology of wood and wood components. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Wood and Pulping Chemistry 1 Stockholm 1981:95–96.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hibbs D. Silviculture in red alder stands In D. N. S. Hon and N. Shiraishi (eds.) Ecology and management of B.C. hardwoods workshop proc. Dec 1–2, 1993. B.C. Ministry of Forests, FRDA Rep. Richmond B.C. 1995:137–138.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hon DNS, Minemura N. Color and discoloration. In: Hon DNS, Shiraishi N, editors. Wood and cellulose chemistry. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc; 1991. p. 100–50.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Salca EA, Cismaru I. Colour changes evaluation of freshly cut alder veneers under the influence of indoor sunlight. ProLigno. 2011;7(1):15–24.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Salca EA. Study upon the colour changes of freshly cut and thermally treated black alder veneers under sunlight and dark indoor exposure. In: Proceedings of the International Conference ICWSE Transilvania University of Brasov 3-5 November 2011: 420–426.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    •• Esteves MB, Pereira HM. Wood modification by heat treatment. A review. Bioresources. 2009;4(1):370–404 This review explains the interest on heat treatment of wood and synthesizes the knowledge of wood properties, chemical changes, wood uses, and quality control.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lacic R, Hasan M, Trajkovic H, Sefc B, Safran B, Despot R. Biological durability of oil heat treated alder wood. Drv Ind. 2014;65(2):143–50.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Salca EA, Hiziroglu S. Evaluation of hardness and surface quality of different wood species as function of heat treatment. Mater Des. 2014;62:416–23.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Yildiz UC, Yildiz ED. The effects of natural weathering on the properties of heat treated alder wood. BioRes. 2011;6(3):2504–21.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bekhta P, Proszyk S, Krystofiak T. Colour in short-term thermo-mechanically densified veneer of various wood species. Eur J Wood Prod. 2014;72:785–97. Scholar
  43. 43.
    Denes L, Lang E. Photodegradation of heat treated hardwood veneers. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2013;118:9–15.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Salca EA, Kobori H, Inagaki T, Kojima Y, Suzuki S. Effect of heat treatment on colour changes of black alder and beech veneers. J Wood Sci. 2016;62(4):297–304. Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tsuchikawa S, Kobori H. A review of recent application of near infrared spectroscopy to wood science and technology. J Wood Sci. 2015;61:213–20.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Malkocoglu A, Ozdemir T. The machining properties of some hardwoods and softwoods naturally grown in Eastern Black Sea Region of Turkey. J Mater Process Technol. 2006;173:315–20.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Malkocoglu A. Machining properties and surface roughness of various wood species planed in different conditions. Build Environ. 2007;42(7):2562–7.,buildenv.2006.08.028.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Salca EA, Laurenzi W, Porojan M. Study upon the roughness of straight milled surfaces made of black alder. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Scientific Conference 2010 under Knowledge-Based Organization KBO 25–27 November 2010 Sibiu Romania 2010:129–135.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Salca EA, Cismaru I, Laurenzi W. Evaluation of final roughness on longitudinal profiled surfaces of black alder wood. In: Proceedings of the International Conference ICWSE 2011 Transilvania University of Brasov 3–5 November 2011:211–216.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Aghakhani M, Abolghasem K. The effect of machining parameters on surface roughness of Alder wood. Asian J Agric Food Sci. 2014;2(6):548–53.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Salca EA. Optimization of wood milling schedule – a case study. ProLigno. 2015;11(4):525–30.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Bendikiene R, Keturakis G. The influence of technical characteristics of wood milling tools on its wear performance. J Wood Sci. 2017;63:606–14. Scholar
  53. 53.
    Pahlitzsch G. International state of research in the field of sanding. Holz als Roh-und Werstoff. 1970;28(329).Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    •• Goli G, Sandak J. Proposal of a new method for the rapid assessment of wood machinability and cutting tool performance in peripheral milling. Eur J Wood Wood Prod. 2016;74(6):867–74. This study provides an automated method to assess the quality of wood processed by peripheral milling and rapid detection of processing defects.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Aguilera A, Martin P. Machining qualification of solid wood of Fagus silvatica L. and Picea excelsa L.: cutting forces, power requirements and surface roughness. Holz als Roh – und Werkstoff. 2001;59:483–8.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Vega M, Aguilera A. Surface roughness and cutting power for machining radiata pine. Bosque. 2005;26(1):101–8.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Keturakis G, Juodeikienė I. Investigation of milled wood surface roughness. Mater Sci (Medžiagotyra). 2007;13(1):47–51.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Hernandez RE, Llave AM, Koubaa A. Effects of cutting parameters on cutting forces and surface quality of black spruce cants. Holz als Roh- und Werkstof. 2014;72(1):107–16.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Kilic M. Effects of machining methods on the surface roughness values of Pinus nigra Arnold wood. BioRes. 2015;10(3):5554–62.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Sogutlu C. The effect of the feeding direction and feeding speed of planing on the surface roughness of oriental beech and Scotch pine woods. Wood Res. 2010;55(4):67–78.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Goli G, Fioravanti M, Marchal R, Uzielli L, Busoni S. Up-milling and down-milling wood with different grain orientations – the cutting forces behavior. Eur J Wood Wood Prod. 2010;68:385–95.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Azemovic E, Horman I, Busuladzic I. Impact of planing treatment regime on solid fir wood surface. Proc Eng. 2014;69:1490–8.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Pinkowski G, Szymański W, Krauss A, Stefanowski S. Effect of sharpness angle and feeding speed on the surface roughness during milling of various wood species. BioRes. 2018;13(3):6952–62.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Rousek M, Kopecky Z. Monitoring of power consumption in high-speed milling. Drv Ind. 2005;56(3):121–6.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Keturakis G, Bendikiene R, Baltrusaitis A. Tool wear evolution and surface formation in milling various wood species. BioRes. 2017;12(4):7943–54.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Sandak J, Goli G, Cetera P, Sandak A, Cavalli A, Todaro L. Machinability of minor wooden species before and after modification with thermo-vacuum technology. Mater (Basel). 2017;10:121. Scholar
  67. 67.
    Jaic M, Palija T, Dordevic M. The impact of surface preparation of wood on the adhesion of certain types of coatings. Zastita Mater. 2014;55:163–9.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Salca EA, Hiziroglu S. Analysis of surface roughness of black alder as function of various processing parameters. ProLigno. 2012;8(2):68–79.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Salca EA, Krystofiak T, Lis B. Evaluation of selected properties of alder wood as functions of sanding and coating. Coatings. 2017;7(10):176. Scholar
  70. 70.
    Varasquim FMF, Alves MC, Goncalves MTT, Santiago LF, Souza AJD. Influence of belt speed, grit sizes and pressure on the sanding of Eucalyptus grandis wood. CERNE Lavras. 2012;18:231–7.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Javorek L, Kudela J, Svoren J, Krajcovicova M. The influence of some factors on cutting force and surface roughness of wood after sanding. ProLigno. 2015;11:516–24.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Salca EA. Optimization of the cutting schedule during sanding. In: Lesnoy vestnik / Forestry Bulletin 2017:21(4):70–72.
  73. 73.
    Demirkir C, Aydin I, Colak S, Colakoglu G. Effects of plasma treatment and sanding process on surface roughness of wood veneers. Turk J Agric For. 2014;38:663–7.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Sofuoglu D, Kurtoglu A. Effects on machining conditions on surface roughness in planing and sanding of solid wood. Drv Ind. 2015;66:265–72.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    • Gurau L, Irle M. Surface roughness evaluation methods for wood products: a review. Curr For Rep. 2017;3:119. This review offers valuable recommendations on how to best measure and evaluate the surface roughness of wood.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    •• Magoss E. Insight into the mechanism of wood sanding. progress report no. 3. Published by the Department of Wood Engineering University of West Hungary Sopron, Hungary. LŐVER-PRINT NYOMDAIPARI KFT. ISBN 978-963-359-062-1, 2015. This work presents experimental results in diagrams showing the basic relationships between the surface roughness parameters and grit diameters and internal relationship between roughness parameters.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Saloni D, Lemaster R, Jackson S. Abrasive machining process characterization on material removal rate, final surface texture and power consumption for wood. For Prod J. 2005;55(12):35–41.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Varanda LD, Alves MCS, Goncalves MTT, Santiago LFF. Influência das varáveis no lixamento tubular na qualidade das peças de Eucalyptus grandis. CERNE Lavras. 2010;16:23–32.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Javorek L, Hric J, Vacek V. The study of chosen parameters during sanding of spruce and beech wood. ProLigno. 2006;2(4):1–11.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Salca EA, Krystofiak T, Lis B, Mazela B. Some coating properties of black alder wood as function of varnish type and applications method. BioRes. 2016;11(3):7580–94. Scholar
  81. 81.
    Vitosyte J, Ukvalbergiene K, Keturakis G. Roughness of sanded wood surface: an impact of wood species, grain direction and grit size of abrasive material. Mater Sci (Medžiagotyra). 2015;21(2):255–9. Scholar
  82. 82.
    Ozdemir T, Hiziroglu S, Kocapınar M. Adhesion strength of cellulosic varnish coated wood species as function of their surface roughness. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2015;2015:1–5. Scholar
  83. 83.
    Vitosyte J, Ukvalbergiene K, Keturakis G. The effects of surface roughness on adhesion strength of coated ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) and birch (Betula alba L.) wood. Mater Sci. 2012;18(4):347–50.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    De Moura LF, Hernandez RE. Effects of abrasive mineral, grit size and feed speed on the quality of sanded surfaces of sugar maple wood. Wood Sci Technol. 2006;40:517–30.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Collett BM. A review of surface and interfacial adhesion in wood science and related fields. Wood Sci Technol. 1972;6:1–42. Scholar
  86. 86.
    Sonmez A, Budakci M, Pelit H. The effect of the moisture content of wood on the layer performance of water-borne varnishes. BioRes. 2011;6:3166–77.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Nejad M, Shafaghi R, Ali H, Cooper P. Coating perfomance on oil-heat treated wood for flooring. BioRes. 2013;8:1881–92.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Wulf M, Netuschil P, Hora G, Schmich P, Cammenga H.K. Investigation of the wetting characteristics of medium density fibreboards MDF by means of contact angle measurements. Holz Roh-Werkst 1997:55:331–335.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Bekhta P, Krystofiak T. The influence of short-term thermo-mechanical densification on the surface wettability of wood veneers. Maderas Cienc Tecnol. 2016;2016, 18(1).
  90. 90.
    •• Petric M, Oven P. Determination of wettability of wood and its significance in wood science and technology: a critical review. Rev Adhes Adhes. 2015;3(2):121–87. In this work the importance of a wettability study is given as regard to wood adhesion, adhesives and surface finishes.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Cakicier N, Korkut S, Korkut D. Varnish layer hardness, scratch resistance, and glossiness of various wood species as affected by heat treatment. BioRes. 2011;6:1648–58.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Slabejova G, Smidriakova M. Gloss of transparent coating on beech wood surface. Acta Fac Xylol. 2016;58:37–44.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Ugulino B, Hernandez RE. Assessment of surface properties and solvent-borne coating performance of red oak wood produced by peripheral planning. Eur J Wood Prod. 2017;75:581–93.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Budakci M, Sonmez A, Pelit H. The color changing effect of the moisture content of wood materials on water borne varnishes. BioRes. 2012;7:5448–59.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Philipp C. The future of wood coatings. Eur Coat J. 2010;1:1–6.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Gurleyen L, Ayata U, Esteves B, Cakicier N. Effects of heat treatment on the adhesion strength, pendulum hardness, surface roughness, color and glossiness of Scots pine laminated parquet with two different types of UV varnish application. Maderas Cienc Tecnol. 2017;19:213–24.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Landry V, Blanchet P, Cormier LM. Water-based and solvent-based stains: impact on the grain raising in yellow birch. BioRes. 2013;8:1997–2009.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Demirci Z, Sonmez A, Budakci M. Effect of thermal ageing on the gloss and adhesion strength of the wood varnish layers. BioRes. 2013;8:1852–67.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Arnold M. Planing and sanding of wood surfaces-effects on surface properties and coating performance. In: Proceedings of the PRA’s 7th International Woodcoatings Congress, Netherlands, Coating technology Centre, Hampton, Middlesex, UK, 2010.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Salca EA, Krystofiak T, Lis B. Some aesthetic decorative features of varnished products. In: Book of abstracts of the COST action FP 1303 workshop Sofia, Bulgaria 28 February – 1 March 2017:43–44.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Salca EA, Krystofiak T, Lis B. Glossiness of coated alder wood after artificial aging. 8th Hardwood Conference, 25–26 October 2018, Sopron, Hungary, 2018 (submitted paper).Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Pelit H, Budakci M, Sonmez A, Burdurlu E. Surface roughness and brightness of scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) applied with water-based varnish after densification and heat treatment. J Wood Sci. 2015;61(6):586–94.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Ayata U, Sahin S, Esteves B, Gurleyen L. Effect of thermal aging on colour and glossiness of UV system varnish-applied laminated parquet layers. BioRes. 2018;13(3):861–8.Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    D’Auria M, Lovaglio T, Rita A, Cetera P, Romani A, Hiziroglu S, et al. Integrate measurements allow the surface characterization of thermo-vacuum treated alder differentially coated. Measurement. 2018;114:372–81.Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Bekhta P, Mamonova M, Sedliacik J, Novak I. Anatomical study of short-term thermo-mechanically densified alder wood veneer with low moisture content. Eur J Wood Wood Prod. 2016;74(5):643–52.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Transilvania University of BrasovBrasovRomania

Personalised recommendations