Penetrating Neck Trauma: a Review
- 49 Downloads
Purpose of Review
This review focuses on the management of penetrating neck trauma and its evolution over the last several decades.
Our increased experience with high-resolution computed tomography has changed the management of penetrating neck trauma from an anatomically zone-based approach to a “no zone” approach. Physical signs and symptoms of vascular, airway, and digestive track injuries still guide the basis of further radiographic and surgical workup. With the advancement and greater availability of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) technology, assessment of injuries has become easier and far more accurate. The hemodynamically stable patient may now be approached in a “no-zone” manner, and in certain cases managed safely with conservative measures.
Wartime experience and improved technology played major roles in the evolution of penetrating neck injury management. Aggressive surgical exploration had given way to selective management based on anatomical neck zones, to most currently a “no zone” approach.
KeywordsPenetrating Neck Trauma Review No-zone Injury
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ten Leading Causes of Death and Injury 2018, April 13. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/injury/images/lc-charts/leading_causes_of_death_age_group_2016_1056w814h.gif. Accessed 15 Nov 2018.
- 3.Rachad M, Wehbe JJH. The Management of Penetrating Neck Injuries. In: Soleiman G, Abu-Sittah JJH, Bakhach J, editors. Reconstructing the War Injured Patient; 2017. p. 31–8.Google Scholar
- 6.Shiroff AM, Gale SC, Martin ND, Marchalik D, Petrov D, Ahmed HM, et al. Penetrating neck trauma: a review of management strategies and discussion of the no zone approach. Am Surg. 2013;79(1):23–9.Google Scholar
- 9.Azuaje RE, Jacobson LE, Glover J, Gomez GA, Rodman GH Jr, Broadie TA, et al. Reliability of physical examination as a predictor of vascular injury after penetrating neck trauma. Am Surg. 2003;69(9):804–7.Google Scholar
- 15.Gary A, Vercruysse DVF. Chapter 22: Neck. In: Moore EE, Feliciano DV, Mattox KL, editors. Trauma. Eighth edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2016.Google Scholar
- 17.Weale R, Madsen A, Kong VY, Clarke DL. The management of penetrating neck injury. Trauma. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460408618767703.
- 18.Lee WT, Eliashar R, Eliachar I. Acute external laryngotracheal trauma: diagnosis and management. Ear Nose Throat J. 2006;85(3):179–84.Google Scholar
- 20.Velopulos CG, Shihab HM, Lottenberg L, Feinman M, Raja A, Salomone J, et al. Prehospital spine immobilization/spinal motion restriction in penetrating trauma: A practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST).(Report)(Author abstract). J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;84(5):736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Hamilton RRJF. Vertebral Artery Injuries in Penetrating Neck and Cervical Spine Trauma. Neurotrauma Management for the Severely Injured Polytrauma Patient. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 103–13.Google Scholar
- 26.Lisa M, Kodadek AK, Haut ER. Penetrating Trauma to the Larynx and the Cervical Trachea. In: Velhamos ED GC, Doll D, editors. Penetrating Trauma; 2017. p. 243–8.Google Scholar
- 27.•• Biffl WL, Moore EE, Feliciano DV, Albrecht RA, Croce M, Karmy-Jones R, et al. Western Trauma Association Critical Decisions in Trauma: Diagnosis and management of esophageal injuries. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;79(6):1089–95 This article is a short read, yet detailed and comprehensive in its discussion regarding management of esophageal injuries. CrossRefGoogle Scholar