Current Trauma Reports

, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp 107–118 | Cite as

Combat Vascular Trauma Management for the General Surgeon

  • Daniel Lammers
  • Matthew J. MartinEmail author
The Military Perspective (MJ Martin and M Schreiber, Section Editors)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on The Military Perspective


Purpose of Review

This review focuses on the initial management and stabilization of complex vascular injuries for the general surgeon within the combat zone.

Recent Findings

Recent conflicts in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria demonstrate that general surgeons are responsible for the initial surgical management of combat-related vascular trauma in damage control scenarios. These injuries display a more complex injury pattern and often require different management strategies than seen in civilian trauma.


Vascular trauma in combat settings is often accompanied by a multitude of life- and limb-threatening injuries. Definitive repair operations are often deferred for initial damage control surgery and resuscitation. Resultant strategies to restore perfusion and control bleeding are determined by the patient’s underlying physiology and frequently require the use of vascular shunts, ligation, primary anastomosis, or interposition grafting. While general surgeons in the combat zone are not typically responsible for definitive repair during initial damage control surgery, proper initial surgical management in the far-forward setting with an intimate understanding of future repair strategies remains critical aspects in assuring optimal definitive treatment.


Vascular trauma Vascular injury Combat trauma Penetrating vascular injury Vascular injury stabilization Arterial injury 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Financial Disclosures

The authors have no relevant financial interests to disclose.


The views expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy of the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government.

The views expressed herein are those of the authors and are not to be construed as official or reflecting the views or policies of the Madigan Army Medical Center, the Scripps Mercy Medical Center, or the Department of Defense.


Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. 1.
    Eastridge BJ, Mabry RL, Seguin P, Cantrell J, Tops T, Uribe P, et al. Death on the battlefield (2001–2011): implications for the future of combat casualty care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6 Suppl 5):S431–4317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kelly JF, Ritenour AE, McLaughlin DF, Bagg KA, Apodaca AN, Mallak CT, et al. Injury severity and causes of death from operation Iraqi freedom and operation enduring freedom: 2003–2004 versus 2006. J Trauma. 2008;64(2 Suppl):S21–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    • Butler FK, Holcomb JB, Shackelford S, Barbabella S, Bailey JA, Baker JB, et al. Advanced resuscitative care in tactical combat casualty care: TCCC guidelines change 18-01:14 October 2018. J Spec Ops Med. 2018;18:37–55 This update to the TCCC Guidelines describes the use of REBOA for noncompressible truncal hemorrhage in combat trauma.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Holcomb JB, Tilley BC, Baraniuk S, Fox EE, Wade CE, Podbielski JM, et al. Transfusion of plasma, platelets, and red blood cells in a 1:1:1 vs a 1:1:2 ratio and mortality in patients with severe trauma: the PROPPR randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313:471–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Holcomb JB, Jenkins D, Rhee P, Johannigman J, Mahoney P, Mehta S, et al. Damage control resuscitation: directly addressing the early coagulopathy of trauma. J Trauma. 2007;62:307–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Langan NR, Eckert M, Martin MJ. Changing patterns of in-hospital deaths following implementation of damage control resuscitation practices in US forward military treatment facilities. JAMA Surgery. 2014;149:904–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Williams-Johnson J, McDonald A, Strachan GG, Williams E. Effects of tranexamic acid on death, vascular occlusive events, and blood transfusion in trauma patients with significant haemorrhage (CRASH-2): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. The West Indian Medical Journal. 2010;59:612–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Morrison JJ, Dubose JJ, Rasmussen TE, Midwinter MJ. Military application of tranexamic acid in trauma emergency resuscitation (MATTERs) study. JAMA Surgery. 2012;147:113–9.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schwartz MR, Weaver FA, Bauer M, Siegel A, Yellin AE. Refining the indications for arteriography in penetrating extremity trauma: a prospective analysis. J Vasc Surg. 1993;17:116–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frykberg E, Dennis J, Bishop K, Laneve L, Alexander R. The reliability of physical examination in the evaluation of penetrating extremity trauma for vascular injury: results at one year. J Trauma. 1991;31:502–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sekharan J, Dennis JW, Veldenz HC, Miranda F, Frykberg ER. Continued experience with physical examination alone for evaluation and management of penetrating zone 2 neck injuries: results of 145 cases. J Vasc Surg. 2000;32:483–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Makins G. On gunshot injuries to the blood-vessels, founded on experience gained in France during the Great War, 1914-1918. Bristol: John Wright & Sons; 1919.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Debakey ME, Simeone FA. Battle injuries of the arteries in World War II: an analysis of 2,471 cases. Ann Surg. 1946;123:534–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hughes CW. The primary repair of wounds of major arteries; an analysis of experience in Korea in 1953. Ann Surg. 1955;141:297–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rich NM, Baugh JH, Hughes CW. Acute arterial injuries in Vietnam: 1,000 cases. J Trauma. 1970;10(5):359–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McNamara JH, Brief DK, Beasley W, Wright JK. Vascular injury in Vietnam combat casualties: results of treatment at the 24th Evacuation Hospital 1 July 1967 to 12 August 1969. Ann Surg. 1973;178:143–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dua A, Patel B, Kragh JF Jr, Holcomb JB, Fox CJ. Long-term follow-up and amputation-free survival in 497 casualties with combat-related vascular injuries and damage-control resuscitation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6):1515–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    White JM, Stannard A, Burkhardt GE, Eastridge BJ, Blackbourne LH, Rasmussen TE. The epidemiology of vascular injury in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Ann Surg. 2011;253(6):1184–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    • Rasmussen T, Stockinger Z, Antevil J, White C, Fernandez N, White J, et al. Wartime vascular injury. Mil Med. 2018;183:101–4 The article describes the current state of the military echelons of care within the combat zone and their relationship to combat vascular trauma.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hirshberg A, Mattox K. In: Allen M, editor. Top knife: the art and craft of trauma surgery. Shrewsbury: TFM Publishing Ltd; 2005.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Holcomb JB, McMullin NR, Pearse L, Caruso J, Wade CE, Oetjen-Gerdes L, et al. Causes of death in U.S. Special Operations Forces in the global war on terrorism: 2001-2004. Ann Surg. 2007;245:986–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Morrison JJ, Rasmussen TE. Noncompressible torso hemorrhage: a review with contemporary definitions and management strategies. Surg Clin North Am. 2012;92:843–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ball CG, Feliciano DV. Damage control techniques for common and external iliac artery injuries: have temporary intravascular shunts replaced the need for ligation? J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:1112–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Martin M, Izenberg S, Cole F, Bergstrom S, Long W. A decade of experience with a selective policy for direct to operating room trauma resuscitations. Am J Surg. 2012;204:187–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Feliciano DV, Moore EE, Biffl WL. Western trauma association critical decisions in trauma: management of abdominal vascular trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;79(6):1079–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Millikan J, Moore E, Cogbill T, Kashuk J. Inferior vena cava injuries—a continuing challenge. J Trauma. 1983;23:207–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gwinn DE, Tintle SM, Kumar AR, Andersen RC, Keeling JJ. Blast-induced lower extremity fractures with arterial injury: prevalence and risk factors for amputation after initial limb-preserving treatment. J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25(9):543–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    • Kotwal RS, Butler FK. Junctional hemorrhage control for tactical combat casualty care. Wilderness & Environmental Medicine. 2017;28:S33–8 This article describes the current techniques and devices for control of junctional hemorrhage, a devastating vascular injury, per TCCC teaching.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    • Brenner M, Bulger EM, Perina DG, Henry S, Kang CS, Rotondo MF, et al. Joint statement from the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS COT) and the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) regarding the clinical use of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA). Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open. 2018;3:e000154 This article represents the consensus statement from the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma and American College of Emergency Physicians on the indications and recommendations for REBOA use.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shackelford SA, Butler FK, Kragh JF, Stevens RA, Seery JM, Parsons DL, et al. Optimizing the use of limb tourniquets in tactical combat casualty care: TCCC guidelines change 14-02. Journal of Special Operations Medicine. 2015;15:17–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Woodward EB, Clouse WD, Eliason JL, Peck MA, Bowser AN, Cox MW, et al. Penetrating femoropopliteal injury during modern warfare: experience of the Balad Vascular Registry. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47(6):1259–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gifford SM, Aidinian G, Clouse WD, Fox CJ, Porras CA, Jones T, et al. Effect of temporary shunting on extremity vascular injury: an outcome analysis from the Global War of Terror vascular injury initiative. J Vasc Surg. 2009;50(3):549–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Burch J, Richardson R, Martin R, Mattox K. Penetrating iliac vascular injuries: recent experience with 233 consecutive patients. J Trauma. 1990;30:1450–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Subramanian A, Vercruysse G, Dente C, Wyrzykowski A, King E, Feliciano DV. A decade’s experience with temporary intravascular shunts at a civilian level I trauma center. J Trauma. 2008;65(2):316–24 discussion 324–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Watson JDB, Houston R, Morrison JJ, Gifford SM, Rasmussen TE. A retrospective cohort comparison of expanded polytetrafluorethylene to autologous vein for vascular reconstruction in modern combat casualty care. Ann Vasc Surg. 2015;29:822–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rozycki GS, Tremblay LN, Feliciano DV, McClelland WB. Blunt vascular trauma in the extremity: diagnosis, management, and outcome. J Trauma. 2003;55(5):814–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    • Inaba K, Aksoy H, Seamon MJ, Marks JA, Duchesne J, Schroll R, et al. Multicenter evaluation of temporary intravascular shunt use in vascular trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;80(3):359–3a64 This paper represents the largest cohort of temporary vascular shunts within civilian trauma and outlines its safety for use.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hornez E, Boddaert G, Ngabou UD, Aguir S, Baudoin Y, Mocellin N, et al. Temporary vascular shunt for damage control of extremity vascular injury: a toolbox for trauma surgeons. Journal of Visceral Surgery. 2015;152:363–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    • Gordon WT, Talbot M, Shero JC, Osier CJ, Johnson AE, Balsamo LH, et al. Acute extremity compartment syndrome and the role of fasciotomy in extremity war wounds. Mil Med. 2018;183:108–11 This article describes the utility, rational, and recommendations for fasciotomy in combat trauma.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryMadigan Army Medical CenterTacomaUSA
  2. 2.Trauma and Acute Care Surgery ServiceScripps Mercy Medical CenterSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations