Pelvic Trauma and the Pregnant Patient: a Review of Physiology, Treatment Risks, and Options
Purpose of Review
Pelvic trauma during pregnancy is an infrequent, but complex clinical scenario requiring immediate multidisciplinary care. This manuscript details epidemiology and pathophysiology, evaluation and treatment, as well as unique elements to the clinical scenario like radiation and anesthesia risks to the pregnant mother and fetus.
The priority of a multidisciplinary treatment team should be directed toward the mother, as prompt treatment gives both the fetus and mother the best possibility for a good outcome. Radiation risks during diagnostic and therapeutic treatments can be minimized with the appropriate measures. Most anesthesia agents are considered safe in clinical practice.
Orthopedic procedures must consider the morbidity of observation versus the risks of surgical intervention. Coordinated appropriate care will maximize the possibility of both the mother and fetus experiencing favorable results.
KeywordsPelvis fracture Fetal trauma Pregnancy Maternal pelvic trauma
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The author declares no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
- 24.Gilles MT, Blair E, Watson L. Trauma in pregnancy and cerebral palsy: is there a link? Mefd J Aust. 1996;164(8):500–1.Google Scholar
- 25.• Pettrone P, Marini CP. Trauma in pregnant patients. Curr Probl Surg. 2015;52(8):330–51. Details physiologic changes occurring in pregnant patients and how resuscitation is influenced by these maternal physiologic changes. Discusses how gestational age influences treatment decisions related to both maternal and fetal care. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Kovacs CS, Ralston SH. Presentation and management of osteoporosis presenting in association with pregnancy or lactation. Orthoporos Int. 2015;26(9):2223–41.Google Scholar
- 43.Otake M and Schull WJ. Br J Radiol 1984 57:677, 409–414.Google Scholar
- 44.ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion Number 299, Sept 2004 Guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104–647-51.Google Scholar
- 48.Van De Velde M, BuckF D. Anesthesia for non-obstetric surgery in the pregnant patient. Minerva Anestesiol. 2007;73:235–70.Google Scholar
- 52.• Bates SM, Greet IA, Middeldorp S, Veenstra DL, Prabulos AM, Vandvik PO. Antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis. American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141:e691S–736S. Presents risks of thromboembolic disease in the pregnant female. Details evidence-based clinical guidelines for thromboembolic disease prophylaxis in the pregnant female. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 54.• Bapat P, Pinto LS, Lubetsky A, Aleksa K, Berge H, Koren G, et al. Examining the transplacental passage of apixaban using the dually perfused human placenta. J Thromb Haemost. 2016;14(7):1436–41. Apixaban has been demonstrated in human placental models travel across the blood brain barrier. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar