Advertisement

Estimating Evapotranspiration Using Coupled Remote Sensing and Three SEB Models in an Arid Region

  • Ahmed ElkatouryEmail author
  • A. A. Alazba
  • Amr Mossad
Original Article
  • 64 Downloads

Abstract

Τhree surface energy balance (SEB) models were used to estimate ET based on remote sensing (RS) techniques: surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL), mapping evapotranspiration at a high-resolution with internalized calibration (METRIC), and simplified surface energy balance index (S-SEBI). The study was conducted on the Todhia Arable Farm (TAF), located in the Riyadh province of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Both RS data and meteorological data were used. RS data were obtained by processing 20 Landsat 8 satellite images for 2014 focused on alfalfa cultivation. The estimated ET was validated by comparing it with the measured ET using an eddy covariance (EC) device. The ET values estimated by the SEBAL, METRIC, and S-SEBI models were 1.7–18.9 mm·d−1 with a mean of 8.3 mm·d−1, 2.8–22.4 mm·d−1 with a mean of 11.0 mm·d−1, and 6.5–21.6 mm·d−1 with a mean of 15.7 mm·d−1, respectively. The highest ET values were observed in cultivated areas, particularly during the periods of increased irrigation. The comparison between the estimated and measured ET indicated that the METRIC model exhibited the best performance, with a root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) of 1.7 mm·d−1. The S-SEBI model was less accurate, followed by the SEBAL model, with an RMSD of 2.9 and 3.1 mm·d−1, respectively. The METRIC model exhibited moderate ET results as well and is considered to be the most suitable ET SEB model for arid regions.

Keywords

Evapotranspiration Remote sensing SEBAL METRIC S-SEBI 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Vice Deanship of Research Chairs, King Saud University, for their financial support.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

  1. Al-Gaadi KA, Patil V, Tola E, Madugundu R, Gowda PH (2016) Evaluation of METRIC-derived ET fluxes over irrigated alfalfa crop in desert conditions using scintillometer measurements. Arab J Geosci 9:441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen R, Irmak A, Trezza R, Hendrickx JM, Bastiaanssen W, Kjaersgaard J (2011) Satellite-based ET estimation in agriculture using SEBAL and METRIC. Hydrol Process 25:4011–4027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen R, Tasumi M, Trezza R, Waters R, Bastiaanssen W (2002a) SEBAL (surface energy balance algorithms for land) advance training and users manual–Idaho implementation, version 1:97Google Scholar
  4. Allen RG, Burnett B, Kramber W, Huntington J, Kjaersgaard J, Kilic A, Kelly C, Trezza R (2013) Automated calibration of the metric-landsat evapotranspiration process. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 49:563–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allen RG, Morse A, Tasumi M, Trezza R, Bastiaanssen W, Wright JL, Kramber W (2002b) Evapotranspiration from a satellite-based surface energy balance for the Snake plain aquifer in Idaho. In: Proc. USCID Conference. USCIDGoogle Scholar
  6. Allen RG, Tasumi M, Morse A, Trezza R (2005) A Landsat-based energy balance and evapotranspiration model in Western US water rights regulation and planning. Irrig Drain Syst 19:251–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Allen RG, Tasumi M, Morse A, Trezza R, Wright JL, Bastiaanssen W, Kramber W, Lorite I, Robison CW (2007a) Satellite-based energy balance for mapping evapotranspiration with internalized calibration (METRIC)—applications. J Irrig Drain Eng 133:395–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Allen RG, Tasumi M, Trezza R (2007b) Satellite-based energy balance for mapping evapotranspiration with internalized calibration (METRIC)—model. J Irrig Drain Eng 133:380–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Antonopoulos VZ, Antonopoulos AV (2017) Daily reference evapotranspiration estimates by artificial neural networks technique and empirical equations using limited input climate variables. Comput Elect Agric 132:86–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Basit A, Khalil R, Haque S (2018) Application of simplified surface energy balance Index (S-SEBI) for crop evapotranspiration using Landsat 8. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XLII-1:33–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bastiaanssen W (2000) SEBAL-based sensible and latent heat fluxes in the irrigated Gediz Basin, Turkey, Turkey. J Hydrol 229:87–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bastiaanssen W, Menenti M, Feddes R, Holtslag A (1998) A remote sensing surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL). 1. Formulation. J Hydrol 212:198–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bastiaanssen WG, Chandrapala L (2003) Water balance variability across Sri Lanka for assessing agricultural and environmental water use. Agric Water Manag 58:171–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bastiaanssen W (1995) Regionalization of surface flux densities and moisture indicators in composite terrain A remote sensing approach under clear skies in Mediterranean climates 271Google Scholar
  15. Bhattarai N, Shaw SB, Quackenbush LJ, Im J, Niraula R (2016) Evaluating five remote sensing based single-source surface energy balance models for estimating daily evapotranspiration in a humid subtropical climate. Int J Appl Earth Observ Geoinf 49:75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burnett B (2007) A procedure for estimating total evapotranspiration using satellite-based vegetation indices with separate estimates from bare soil. Ms. Thesis, University of Idaho, Moscow, IdahoGoogle Scholar
  17. Cai X, Sharma BR (2010) Integrating remote sensing, census and weather data for an assessment of rice yield, water consumption and water productivity in the indo-Gangetic river basin. Agric Water Manag 97:309–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Çakir R, Kanburoglu-Çebi U, Altintas S, Ozdemir A (2017) Irrigation scheduling and water use efficiency of cucumber grown as a spring-summer cycle crop in solar greenhouse. Agric Water Manag 180:78–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cammalleri C, Anderson M, Gao F, Hain C, Kustas W (2013) A data fusion approach for mapping daily evapotranspiration at field scale. Water Resour Res 49:4672–4686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cammalleri C, Anderson M, Kustas W (2014) Upscaling of evapotranspiration fluxes from instantaneous to daytime scales for thermal remote sensing applications. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18:1885–1894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Caselles V, Artigao M, Hurtado E, Coll C, Brasa A (1998) Mapping actual evapotranspiration by combining Landsat TM and NOAA-AVHRR images: application to the Barrax area, Albacete, Spain. Remote Sens Environ 63:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen B et al (2018) Global land-water nexus: agricultural land and freshwater use embodied in worldwide supply chains. Sci Total Environ 613:931–943Google Scholar
  23. Chirouze J, Boulet G, Jarlan L, Fieuzal R, Rodriguez JC, Ezzahar J, Raki SE, Bigeard G, Merlin O, Garatuza PJ (2014) Intercomparison of four remote-sensing-based energy balance methods to retrieve surface evapotranspiration and water stress of irrigated fields in semi-arid climate. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 18:1165–1188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Courault D, Seguin B, Olioso A (2005) Review on estimation of evapotranspiration from remote sensing data: From empirical to numerical modeling approaches. Irrig Drain Syst 19:223–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Delogu E et al (2018) Evaluation of the SPARSE dual-source model for predicting water stress and evapotranspiration from thermal infrared data over multiple crops and climates. Remote Sens (Basel) 10:1806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Elnmer A, Khadr M, Kanae S, Tawfik A (2019) Mapping daily and seasonally evapotranspiration using remote sensing techniques over the Nile delta. Agric Water Manag 213:682–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Foken T, Oncley S (1995) Workshop on instrumental and methodical problems of land surface flux measurements. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 76:1191–1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. French AN, Hunsaker DJ, Thorp KR (2015) Remote sensing of evapotranspiration over cotton using the TSEB and METRIC energy balance models. Remote Sens Environ 158:281–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fuehrer P, Friehe C (2002) Flux corrections revisited. Bound-Lay Meteorol 102:415–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gibson L, Jarmain C, Su Z, Eckardt F (2013) Estimating evapotranspiration using remote sensing and the Surface Energy Balance System–A South African perspective. Water Sa 39:477–484Google Scholar
  31. Gokmen M, Vekerdy Z, Verhoef A, Verhoef W, Batelaan O, Van der Tol C (2012) Integration of soil moisture in SEBS for improving evapotranspiration estimation under water stress conditions. Remote Sens Environ 121:261–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gonzalez-Dugo M, Neale C, Mateos L, Kustas W, Prueger J, Anderson M, Li F (2009) A comparison of operational remote sensing-based models for estimating crop evapotranspiration. Agric For Meteorol 149:1843–1853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hemakumara H, Chandrapala L, Moene AF (2003) Evapotranspiration fluxes over mixed vegetation areas measured from large aperture scintillometer. Agric Water Manag 58:109–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Irmak A, Ratcliffe I, Ranade P, Hubbard KG, Singh RK, Kamble B, Kjaersgaard J (2011) Estimation of land surface evapotranspiration with a satellite remote sensing procedure. Great Plains Res:73–88Google Scholar
  35. Jaksa WT, Sridhar V (2015) Effect of irrigation in simulating long-term evapotranspiration climatology in a human-dominated river basin system. Agric For Meteorol 200:109–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kalma JD, McVicar TR, McCabe MF (2008) Estimating land surface evaporation: a review of methods using remotely sensed surface temperature data. Surv Geophys 29:421–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kang S et al (2017) Improving agricultural water productivity to ensure food security in China under changing environment: from research to practice. Agric Water Manag 179:5–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kustas W, Norman J (1996) Use of remote sensing for evapotranspiration monitoring over land surfaces. Hydrol Sci J 41:495–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Li Z-L, Tang R, Wan Z, Bi Y, Zhou C, Tang B, Yan G, Zhang X (2009) A review of current methodologies for regional evapotranspiration estimation from remotely sensed data. Sensors 9:3801–3853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lian J, Huang M (2015) Evapotranspiration estimation for an oasis area in the Heihe River basin using Landsat-8 images and the METRIC model. Water Resour Manage 29:5157–5170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lian J, Huang M (2016) Comparison of three remote sensing based models to estimate evapotranspiration in an oasis-desert region. Agric Water Manag 165:153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Liaqat UW, Choi M (2015) Surface energy fluxes in the Northeast Asia ecosystem: SEBS and METRIC models using Landsat satellite images. Agric For Meteorol 214:60–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Liou Y-A, Kar S (2014) Evapotranspiration estimation with remote sensing and various surface energy balance algorithms—a review. Energies 7:2821–2849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Liu SM, Xu ZW, Wang W, Jia Z, Zhu M, Bai J, Wang J (2011) A comparison of eddy-covariance and large aperture scintillometer measurements with respect to the energy balance closure problem. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15:1291–1306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ma Y, Liu S, Song L, Xu Z, Liu Y, Xu T, Zhu Z (2018) Estimation of daily evapotranspiration and irrigation water efficiency at a Landsat-like scale for an arid irrigation area using multi-source remote sensing data. Remote Sens Environ 216:715–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Madugundu R, Al-Gaadi KA, Tola E, Hassaballa AA, Patil VC (2017a) Performance of the METRIC model in estimating evapotranspiration fluxes over an irrigated field in Saudi Arabia using Landsat-8 images. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 21:6135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Madugundu R, Al-Gaadi KA, Tola E, Kayad AG, Hassaballa AA, Patil VC (2017b) Seasonal dynamics of surface energy fluxes over a center-pivot irrigated cropland in Saudi Arabia. J Environ Biol 38:743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mahmoud SH, Alazba A (2016a) A coupled remote sensing and the Surface Energy Balance based algorithms to estimate actual evapotranspiration over the western and southern regions of Saudi Arabia. J Asian Earth Sci 124:269–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mahmoud SH, Alazba A (2016b) Surface energy balance algorithm for land-based consumption water use of different land uses-cover types in arid-semiarid regions. Water Sci Technol: Water Supp 16:1497–1451Google Scholar
  50. Mahmoud SH, Gan TY (2019) Irrigation water management in arid regions of Middle East: assessing spatio-temporal variation of actual evapotranspiration through remote sensing techniques and meteorological data. Agric Water Manag 212:35–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Massman W, Lee X (2002) Eddy covariance flux corrections and uncertainties in long-term studies of carbon and energy exchanges. Agric For Meteorol 113:121–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Matinfar H (2012) Evapotranspiration estimation base upon SEBAL model and fieldwork annals of. Biol Res 3:2459–2463Google Scholar
  53. Mauser W, Schädlich S (1998) Modelling the spatial distribution of evapotranspiration on different scales using remote sensing data. J Hydrol 212:250–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Menenti M, Choudhury B (1993) Parameterization of land surface evapotranspiration using a location dependent potential evapotranspiration and surface temperature range. Exchange Process Land Surf Range Space Time Scales 212:561–568Google Scholar
  55. Merlin O, Chirouze J, Olioso A, Jarlan L, Chehbouni G, Boulet G (2014) An image-based four-source surface energy balance model to estimate crop evapotranspiration from solar reflectance/thermal emission data (SEB-4S). Agric For Meteorol 184:188–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mohamed Y, Bastiaanssen W, Savenije H (2004) Spatial variability of evaporation and moisture storage in the swamps of the upper Nile studied by remote sensing techniques. J Hydrol 289:145–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50:885–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nakai T, Shimoyama K (2012) Ultrasonic anemometer angle of attack errors under turbulent conditions. Agric For Meteorol 162:14–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Parajuli PB, Jayakody P, Ouyang Y (2018) Evaluation of using remote sensing evapotranspiration data in SWAT. Water Resour Manage 32:985–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Roerink G, Su Z, Menenti M (2000) S-SEBI: a simple remote sensing algorithm to estimate the surface energy balance. Phys Chem Earth Part B: Hydrol Oceans Atmos 25:147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Saadi S et al (2018) Assessment of actual evapotranspiration over a semiarid heterogeneous land surface by means of coupled low-resolution remote sensing data with an energy balance model: comparison to extra-large aperture scintillometer measurements. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 22:2187–2209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Senay GB, Budde M, Verdin JP, Melesse AM (2007) A coupled remote sensing and simplified surface energy balance approach to estimate actual evapotranspiration from irrigated fields. Sensors 7:979–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Senay GB, Budde ME, Verdin JP (2011) Enhancing the Simplified Surface Energy Balance (SSEB) approach for estimating landscape ET: Validation with the METRIC model. Agric Water Manag 98:606–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Silva BB, Braga AC, Braga CC, de Oliveira LM, Montenegro SM, Barbosa Junior B (2016) Procedures for calculation of the albedo with OLI-Landsat 8 images: application to the Brazilian semi-arid. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 20:3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Singh RK, Irmak A (2011) Treatment of anchor pixels in the METRIC model for improved estimation of sensible and latent heat fluxes. Hydrol Sci J 56:895–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Singh RK, Senay GB (2015) Comparison of four different energy balance models for estimating evapotranspiration in the Midwestern United States. Water 8:9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Song L, Liu S, Kustas WP, Zhou J, Xu Z, Xia T, Li M (2016) Application of remote sensing-based two-source energy balance model for mapping field surface fluxes with composite and component surface temperatures. Agric For Meteorol 230:8–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stewart B, Lal R (2018) Increasing world average yields of cereal crops: it’s all about water. In: Advances in agronomy, vol 151. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–44Google Scholar
  70. Sun Z, Wei B, Su W, Shen W, Wang C, You D, Liu Z (2011) Evapotranspiration estimation based on the SEBAL model in the Nansi Lake Wetland of China. Math Comput Model 54:1086–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tasumi M, Trezza R, Allen RG, Wright JL (2005) Operational aspects of satellite-based energy balance models for irrigated crops in the semi-arid US. Irrig Drain Syst 19:355–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. USGS (2015) Satellite image. https://ers.cr.usgs.gov/login/. Accessed 11 Nov 2015
  73. Valayamkunnath P, Sridhar V, Zhao W, Allen RG (2018) Intercomparison of surface energy fluxes, soil moisture, and evapotranspiration from eddy covariance, large-aperture scintillometer, and modeling across three ecosystems in a semiarid climate. Agric For Meteorol 248:22–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Van der Kwast J et al (2009) Evaluation of the surface energy balance system (SEBS) applied to ASTER imagery with flux-measurements at the SPARC 2004 site (Barrax, Spain). Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 6:1165–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wagle P, Bhattarai N, Gowda PH, Kakani VG (2017) Performance of five surface energy balance models for estimating daily evapotranspiration in high biomass sorghum. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 128:192–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Walter IA et al. (2000) ASCE’s standardized reference evapotranspiration equation. In: Proceedings of the Watershed Management 2000 Conference, June, 2000Google Scholar
  77. Waters R, Allen R, Bastiaanssen W, Tasumi M, Trezza R (2002) SEBAL surface energy balance algorithms for land Idaho implementation advanced training and users manual, Idaho, USAGoogle Scholar
  78. Wu X, Zhou J, Wang H, Li Y, Zhong B (2015) Evaluation of irrigation water use efficiency using remote sensing in the middle reach of the Heihe river, in the semi-arid northwestern China. Hydrol Process 29:2243–2257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. WWAP (2016) The United Nations world water development report 2016: water and jobs. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  80. Xue B-L, Wang L, Li X, Yang K, Chen D, Sun L (2013) Evaluation of evapotranspiration estimates for two river basins on the Tibetan Plateau by a water balance method. J Hydrol 492:290–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Yang Y et al (2018) Intercomparison of three two-source energy balance models for partitioning evaporation and transpiration in semiarid climates. Remote Sens (Basel) 10:1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zanter K (2016) Landsat 8 (L8) data users handbook Landsat science official websiteGoogle Scholar
  83. Zhan C, Yin J, Wang F, Dong Q (2015) Regional estimation and validation of remotely sensed evapotranspiration in China. Catena 133:35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zhang K, Kimball JS, Running SW (2016) A review of remote sensing based actual evapotranspiration estimation. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water 3:834–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zhao J, Olivas PC, Kunwor S, Malone SL, Staudhammer CL, Starr G, Oberbauer SF (2018) Comparison of sensible heat flux measured by large aperture scintillometer and eddy covariance in a seasonally-inundated wetland. Agric For Meteorol 259:345–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zhou X, Bi S, Yang Y, Tian F, Ren D (2014) Comparison of ET estimations by the three-temperature model, SEBAL model and eddy covariance observations. J Hydrol 519:769–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Alamoudi Water Research ChairKing Saud UniversityRiyadhKingdom of Saudi Arabia
  2. 2.Agricultural Engineering DepartmentKing Saud UniversityRiyadhKingdom of Saudi Arabia
  3. 3.Agricultural Engineering DepartmentAin Shams UniversityCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations