Advertisement

Green Stormwater Infrastructure (GSI) for Stormwater Management in the City of Los Angeles: Avalon Green Alleys Network

  • K. Majid SadeghiEmail author
  • Shahram Kharaghani
  • Wing Tam
  • Natalia Gaerlan
  • Hugo Loáiciga
SHORT COMMUNICATION

Abstract

Stormwater runoff creates flooding/pollution hazards in urban areas and Green Stormwater Infrastructure (GSI) provides modern technologies for prevention and mitigation. The Avalon Green Alley Network North and South GSI Demonstration Project (The GSIs) described in this article is a joint partnership between Los Angeles Sanitation (LASAN) and The Trust for Public Land (TPL). The GSIs is located in public alley right-of-way in a high-density neighborhood (residential, schools, parks, commercial building). The GSIs slows and infiltrates stormwater on site, capturing runoff from intersecting street catch basins, employing dry-well chambers, replacing impervious/conventional asphalt with permeable surfaces, percolating stormwater, and providing underground storage. The GSIs north section is closed to vehicular traffic after construction of a grassy swale to capture stormwater. Stormwater drains toward interlocking pavers and into underground infiltration trenches, with extra flows conveyed to a dry-well system. Monitoring includes groundwater monitoring wells, flow meters, and water-level loggers (measure water quality/quantity). Further benefits for the community includes of growing of vines/espalier trees, artistic paving, and mural artwork evoking artistic expression. The GSIs approach is setting a new trend for stormwater management in the City of Los Angeles in the untapped 1440 km of alleys, and serves as a model of community development through stormwater management to other cities.

Keywords

Green Stormwater infrastructure (GSI) Stormwater control measures (SCM) Infiltration trench Permeable pavers Dry Wells Green alleys 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the many employees of the City, especially those from the Watershed Protection Division of the LASAN. In addition, authors are grateful to The Trust for Public Land, the Council for Watershed Health, the Coalition for Responsible Community Development, and the Los Angeles Conservation Corps. Author’s gratitude is extended to all those individuals from governmental and private agencies who have contributed to stormwater control in the Avalon Green Alley Network. Funding for this GSIs has been provided in full or in part through an agreement with the California State Water Resource Control Board. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the California State Water Resources Control Board, nor does the citation of the trade names or commercial products implies or recommends their use.

Supplementary material

40710_2019_364_MOESM1_ESM.docx (28.3 mb)
ESM 1 Additional supporting information is found online under the Supporting Material tab for this article. The Supporting Material presents detail Avalon Alley GSI characteristics and monitoring procedures used in the manuscript and pictures of the site conditions. (DOCX 28992 kb)

References

  1. Campana ME (2017) Are Groundwater Management Districts in Oregon’s Future? 2017 American Water Resources Association Congress, Portland, OR, November 5–9Google Scholar
  2. City of Chicago (2010) The Chicago Green Alley Handbook. Department of Transportation, City of Chicago, Illinois (https://www.cityofchicago.org/content/dam/city/depts/cdot/Green_Alley_Handbook_2010.pdf)Google Scholar
  3. City of Los Angeles (2009a) Green infrastructure for Los Angeles. Addressing urban runoff and water supply through low impact Development/Green Streets & Green Alleys Design Guidelines Standards. City of Los Angeles, California (http://www.lastormwater.org/wp-content/files_mf/greenstreetguidelines.pdf)
  4. City of Los Angeles (2009b) Watershed Protection Division. Water Quality Compliance Master Plan for Urban Runoff. City of Los Angeles, California (http://www.lastormwater.org/wp-content/files_mf/wqcmpur.pdf)
  5. City of Los Angeles (2009c) Rainwater Harvesting Program - A Homeowner How to Guide. The City of Los Angeles Rainwater Harvesting Program (designed to help homeowners learn to capture rainwater for beneficial use, and reduce the amount of rainwater flowing from their roofs into the storm drain system). City of Los Angeles, California (http://www.lastormwater.org/wp-content/files_mf/homeowner_howto_guide.pdf)
  6. City of Los Angeles (2012) South LA Green Alley Master Plan. City of Los Angeles, California (http://www.lastormwater.org/green-la/south-la-green-alley-master-plan/)
  7. City of Los Angeles (2016) Development Best Management Practices Handbook. Low Impact Development. 5th Edition. City of Los Angeles, California (http://www.lastormwater.org/wp-content/files_mf/lidmanualfinal.pdf)
  8. City of Los Angeles (2018) Toward a greener Los Angeles, The Wilmington urban greening plan. Los Angeles, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  9. City of Richmond (2011) The City of Richmond Green Alley Program, Richmond, Virginia (https://www.villanova.edu/content/dam/villanova/engineering/vcase/sym-presentations/2011/51_4harper.pdf)
  10. Clary J, Piza H (2017) Cost of maintaining green infrastructure. ASCE, VirginiaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis AP (2005) Green engineering principles promote low-impact development. Environ Sci Technol 8-15:338–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gülbaz S, Kazezyılmaz-Alhan CM (2018) Impact of LID implementation on water quality in Alibeyköy watershed in Istanbul, Turkey. Environmental Processes 11(Supplement 1):201–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guo Q (2017) Stormwater manufactured treatment devises. ASCE, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  14. Hagekhalil A, Kharaghani S, Tam W, Haimann R, Susilo K (2014) Becoming the green-Blue City. Civ Eng 12:68–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Houle JJ, Roseen RM, Ballestero TP, Puls TA, Sherrard J (2013) Comparison of maintenance cost, labor demands, and system performance for LID and conventional stormwater management. J Environ Eng 139(7):932–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kurkalova LA (2015) Cost-effective placement of best management practices in a watershed: lessons learned from a conservation effects assessment project. J Am Water Works Assoc 51(2):359–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Larsen T, Broch K, Andersen MR (1998) First flush effects in an urban catchment area in Aalborg. Water Sci Technol 37(1):251–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Loáiciga HA (2005) Steady-state phreatic surfaces in sloping aquifers. Water Resour Res 41:W08402.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003861 Google Scholar
  19. Loáiciga HA, Sadeghi KM, Shivers S, Kharaghani S (2015a) Stormwater control measures: optimization methods for sizing and selection. J Water Resour Plan Manag 141(9):040150061–0401500610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Loáiciga HA, Sadeghi KM, Shivers S, Kharaghani S (2015b) Physical-economic approach for urban stormwater management: application to the City of Los Angeles. ASCE, World Environmental & Water Resources Congress, Austin, TX 17 – 21:374–408Google Scholar
  21. National Association of City Transportation Officials (2017) Urban Street Stormwater Guide. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  22. Novotny V (2002) Water quality-diffuse pollution and watershed management, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Sadeghi KM, Kharaghani S, Tam W, Johnson T, Hanna M (2017a) Broadway neighborhood stormwater greenway project in Los Angeles, California. ASCE, World Environmental & Water Resources Congress, Sacramento, CA 21-25:82–96Google Scholar
  24. Sadeghi KM, Loáiciga HA, Kharaghani S (2017b) Stormwater control measures for runoff and water quality management in urban landscapes. J Am Water Resour Assoc 54(1):124–133.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12547 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sebti A, Fuamba M, Bennis S (2016) Optimization model for BMP selection and placement in a combined sewer. J Water Resour Plan Manag 142(3):04015068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stenstrom MK, Kayhanian M (2005) First flush phenomenon characterization, Report to California Department of Transportation, CTSW-RT-05-73-02.6Google Scholar
  27. Yorko K, Cox B, McGill J, Reinicke J (2010) Mastering stormwater management: a decade of growth. Proceedings of the conference on watershed management 2010: innovations in watershed management under land use and climate change, ASCE press (New York), Madison, Wisconsin, August 23e-27 pp 683–691Google Scholar
  28. Zhen JX, Yu SL (2004) Optimal location and sizing of stormwater basins at the watershed scale. J Water Resour Plan Manag 130(4):339–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Majid Sadeghi
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Shahram Kharaghani
    • 1
  • Wing Tam
    • 1
  • Natalia Gaerlan
    • 3
    • 4
  • Hugo Loáiciga
    • 5
  1. 1.Watershed Protection DivisionLA SanitationCaliforniaUSA
  2. 2.Department of GeographyUniversity of CaliforniaCaliforniaUSA
  3. 3.Orange County ParksIrvineUSA
  4. 4.Formally at The Trust for Public LandPasadenaUSA
  5. 5.Department of GeographyUniversity of CaliforniaCaliforniaUSA

Personalised recommendations