Advertisement

Environmental Processes

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 43–63 | Cite as

Greywater Treatment Using Single and Combined Adsorbents for Landscape Irrigation

  • Mohammad Javad AmiriEmail author
  • Mehdi Bahrami
  • Morteza Badkouby
  • Ioannis K. Kalavrouziotis
Original Article
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

Greywater reuse can be considered as an additional supply of water not only to protect water resources but also to reduce water shortage. Thus, the aim of this research is to examine the feasibility of three adsorbents (activated carbon (AC), Iranian natural zeolite (Z) and stabilized nano zero-valent iron (nZVI)) in single and combined forms to treat greywater for reuse in landscape irrigation. For this purpose, greywater samples were collected from student hostel of Fasa University and analyzed in a batch mode experiment. Also, the adsorption of COD was studied in terms of kinetic, isotherm and thermodynamic models. The results indicated that among the seven treatments, the combination of AC, Z and nZVI had the best performance in greywater treatment. 85.75% removal of COD, 91.81% of TDS and 98.1% of turbidity were achieved by triple combined treatment. In double combined adsorbents, the highest adsorption rate of COD, TDS and turbidity was accomplished when AC+nZVI, AC+Z and nZVI+Z were used, respectively. The results also indicate that single adsorbents alone are not adequate to guarantee a sufficient reduction of COD, TDS and turbidity. Kinetics of COD removal by all treatments obeyed to pseudo-second-order model and the Freundlich isotherm closely fitted the experimental data. The COD data demonstrated that the sorption process is spontaneous and endothermic. The results indicated that the triple combined adsorbents were able to reduce the COD, TDS, turbidity and pH level to the required reuse in landscape irrigation and the results were satisfactory according to Iranian standards.

Keywords

Water shortage Pseudo-second-order model Freundlich model Iranian standards 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of Interest

The authors state that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abdul Halim A, Abdul Aziz H, Johari MAM, Ariffin KS (2010) Comparison study of ammonia and COD adsorption on zeolite, activated carbon and composite materials in landfill leachate treatment. Desalination 262:31–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aghakhani A, Mousavi SF, Mostafazadeh-Fard B, Rostamian R, seraji M (2011) Application of some combined adsorbents to remove salinity parameters from drainage water. Desalination 275(1–3):217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aghakhani A, Mousavi SF, Mostafazadeh-Fard B (2012) Desalination of saline water with single and combined adsorbents. Desalin Water Treat 51(7–9):1928–1935Google Scholar
  4. Albalawneh A, Chang TK (2015) Review of the greywater and proposed recycling scheme for agricultural irrigation reuses. Int J Res-GRANTHAALA 12(3):16–35Google Scholar
  5. Alcamo J, Henrichs T, Rösch T (2000) World water in 2025: global modeling and scenario analysis for the world commission on water for the 21st century. Center for Environmental Systems Research, University of Kassel, 34109 Kassel, Germany. Report No. 2Google Scholar
  6. Amiri MJ, Abedi-Koupai J, Eslamian SS, Mousavi SF, Hasheminejad H (2013) Modeling Pb(II) adsorption from aqueous solution by ostrich bone ash using adaptive neural-based fuzzy inference system. J Environ Sci Health, Part A 48(5):543–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Amiri MJ, Eslamian S, Arshadi M, Khozaei M (2015) Water recycling and community. In: Eslamian S (ed) Urban water reuse handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 261–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Amiri MJ, Abedi-Koupai J, Eslamian SS, Arshadi M (2016) Adsorption of Pb(II) and Hg(II) ions from aqueous single metal solutions by using surfactant-modified ostrich bone waste. Desalin Water Treat 57(35):16522–16539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Amiri MJ, Abedi-koupai J, Eslamian S (2017) Adsorption of Hg(II) and Pb(II) ions by nanoscale zero-valent iron supported on ostrich bone ash in a fixed-bed column system. Water Sci Technol 76(3):671–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chrispim MC, Nolasco MA (2017) Greywater treatment using a moving bed biofilm reactor at a university campus in Brazil. J Clean Prod 142(1):290–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Della Rocca C, Belgiorno V, Meriç S (2007) Overview of in-situ applicable nitrate removal processes. Desalination 204(1–3):46–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eriksson E, Auffarth K, Henze M, Ledin A (2002) Characteristics of grey wastewater. Urban Water J 4(1):85–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eslamian S, Amiri MJ, Abedi-Koupai J, Shaeri-Karimi S (2013) Reclamation of unconventional water using nano zero-valent iron particles: an application for groundwater. Int J Water 7(1/2):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fatta-Kassinos D, Kalavrouziotis IK, Koukoulakis PH, Vasquez MI (2011) The risks associated with wastewater reuse and xenobiotics in the agroecological environment. Sci Total Environ 409:3555–3563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Friedler E, Hadari M (2006) Economic feasibility of on-site greywater reuse in multi-storey buildings. Desalination 190:221–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gharaibeh SH, Moore SV, Buck A (1998) Effluent treatment of industrial wastewater using processed solid residue of olive mill products and commercial activated carbon. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 71(4):291–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gil A, Amiri MJ, Abedi-Koupai J, Eslamian S (2018) Adsorption/reduction of Hg (II) and Pb (II) from aqueous solutions by using bone ash/nZVI composite: effects of aging time, Fe loading quantity and co-existing ions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(3):2814–2829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Horsfall M Jr, Spiff AI (2008) Effects of temperature on the sorption of Pb2+ and Cd2+ from aqueous solution by Caladium bicolor (wild cocoyam) biomass. Electron J Biotechnol 8:162–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Itayama T, Kiji M, Suetsugu A, Tanaka N, Saito T, Iwami N, Mizuochi M, Inamori Y (2004) On site experiments of the slanted soil treatment systems for domestic gray water. Water Sci Technol 53(9):193–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jagadevan S, Jayamurthy M, Dobson P, Thompson I (2012) A novel hybrid nano zerovalent iron initiated oxidation-biological degradation approach for remediation of recalcitrant waste metalworking fluids. Water Res 46:2395–2404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leboda R (1993) Carbon-mineral adsorbents - new type of sorbents part II. Surface properties and methods of their modification. Mater Chem Phys 34(2):123–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li F, Wichmaan K, Otterpohl R (2009) Review of the technological approaches for grey water treatment and reuses. Sci Total Environ 407(11):3439–3449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Malekian R, Abedi-Koupai J, Eslamian SS, Mousavi SF, Abbaspour K, Afyuni M (2011) Ion-exchange process for ammonium removal and release using natural zeolite. Appl Clay Sci 51(3):323–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. March JG, Gual M, Orozco F (2004) Experiences on greywater re-use for toilet flushing in a hotel (Mallorca Island, Spain). Desalination 164(3):241–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pedrero F, Kalavrouziotis I, Alarcon JJ, Koukoulakis P, Asano T (2010) Use of treated municipal wastewater in irrigated agriculture-review of some practices in Spain and Greece. Agr Water Manage 97:1233–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pidou M (2006) Hybrid membrane processes for water reuse. PhD thesis, Cranfield University, UKGoogle Scholar
  27. Pidou M, Avery L, Stephenson T, Jeffrey P, Parsons SA, Liu S, Memon FA, Jefferson B (2008) Chemical solutions for greywater recycling. Chemosphere 71(1):147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Qu X, Alvarez JJ, Li Q (2013) Applications of nanotechnology in water and wastewater treatment. Water Res 47(12):3931–3946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shamabadi N, Bakhtiari H, Kochakian N, Farahani M (2015) The investigation and designing of an onsite grey water treatment system at Hazrat-e-Masoumeh University, Qom, IRAN. Energy Procedia 74:1337–1346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sievers JC, Wätzel T, Londong J, Kraft E (2016) Case study: characterization of source-separated blackwater and greywater in the ecological housing estate Lübeck “Flintenbreite” (Germany). Environ Earth Sci 75:1428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2004) Guidelines for Water Reuse. EPA 625-R-04e108. Office of Water, Washington DC. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/pubs/625r04108/625r04108appc.pdf (accessed 15.04.14)
  32. Vymazal J (2005) Horizontal sub-surface flow and hybrid constructed wetlands systems for wastewater treatment. Ecol Eng 25(5):478–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wilderer P (2004) Applying sustainable water management concepts in rural and urban areas: some thoughts about reasons, means and needs. Water Sci Technol 49(7):7–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. World Health Organization (1989) Health guidelines for the use of wastewater in agriculture and aquaculture. Tech Rep Ser 778 ISSN 0512-3054Google Scholar
  35. World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean (2006) A compendium of standards for wastewater reuse in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/116515
  36. Yocum D (2006) Design manual: greywater biofiltration constructed wetland system, Santa Barbara: Bren School of Environmental Science and Management. University of California, Santa Barbara (available online fiesta.bren.ucsb.edu/~chiapas2/.../greywater%20Wetlands-1.Pdf [accessed on 08.03.2011])
  37. Zipf MS, Pinheiro IG, Conegero MG (2016) Simplified greywater treatment systems: slow filters of sand and slate waste followed by granular activated carbon. J Environ Manag 176:119–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of AgricultureFasa UniversityFasaIran
  2. 2.School of Science and TechnologyHellenic Open UniversityPatrasGreece

Personalised recommendations