Advertisement

Recirculating Water Treatment in Closed Hydroponic Systems: Assessment of Granular Activated Carbon and Soft Templated Mesoporous Carbon for Adsorptive Removal of Root Exudates

  • Seyedahmad Hosseinzadeh
  • Ze Liu
  • Jasmien De Graeve
  • Mona BKheet
  • Wannes Libbrecht
  • Jeriffa De Clercq
  • Stijn Van HulleEmail author
Original Article
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

The present study deals with the characterization of reused nutrient solution (RNS) from a hydroponic farm (lettuce). Chemical analysis with GC-MS revealed the presence of eleven individual organic acids as a part of root exudates (acetic, acrylic, maleic, succinic, benzoic, phthalic, sebacic, myristic, palmitic, oleic and stearic acid). Based on these results, first batch tests were developed to determine the breakthrough time and the best kinetic model for adsorption of benzoic acid (as an indicator of these 11 organic acids) on two different types of carbon based adsorbents (granular activated carbon-GAC and soft templated mesoporous carbon-SMC). In order to evaluate the adsorption kinetics, four different kinetic models were fit to the experimental data. The pseudo-second-order best represented the experimental data for both adsorbents at all dosages, exhibiting high linear correlation coefficients (R2 ≥ 0.98). Second, to gain a better understanding of the adsorption efficiency during the batch experiments, several parameters were measured (i.e., COD, UV254, pH and EC) and the effect of adsorbent dosages on these parameters was studied. Third, the effect of different flow rates and bed heights on the breakthrough curve was studied during column tests. These curves were fitted to four well-known fixed-bed adsorption models, namely Thomas, Bohart−Adams, Yoon–Nelson and BDST models. The latter model was found to be most suitable (R2 ≥ 0.88) to predict the breakthrough curve for benzoic acid uptake on GAC in fixed bed column. Scale up analysis revealed that approximately 72 kg GAC is required to treat RNS during 27 days for a typical flow rate of 360 L h−1 (3200 kg L−1).

Graphical Abstract

Root exudates removal using adsorption process

Keywords

Closed hydroponics Root exudates Water treatment Sustainability Granular activated carbon (GAC) Soft templated mesoporous carbon (SMC) 

Notes

References

  1. Aksu Z, Gönen F (2004) Biosorption of phenol by immobilized activated sludge in a continuous packed bed: prediction of breakthrough curves. Process Biochem 39(5):599–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andriolo JL, Godoi RDS, Cogo CM, Bortolotto OC, Da Luz GL, Madaloz JC (2006) Growth and development of lettuce plants at high NH4 +: NO3 ratios in the nutrient solution. Hortic Bras 24(3):352–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asao T, Hasegawa K, Sueda Y, Tomita K, Taniguchi K, Hosoki T, Pramanik M, Matsui Y (2003) Autotoxicity of root exudates from taro. Sci Hortic 97(3):389–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asao T, Kitazawa H, Ban T, Pramanik MHR, Matsui Y, Hosoki T (2004) Search of autotoxic substances in some leaf vegetables. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 73(3):247–249Google Scholar
  5. Asao T, Kitazawa H, Tomita K, Suyama K, Yamamoto H, Hosoki T, Pramanik MHR (2004a) Mitigation of cucumber autotoxicity in hydroponic culture using microbial strain. Sci Hortic 99:207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Asao T, Kitazawa H, Ushio K, Sueda Y, Ban T, Pramanik MHR (2007) Autotoxicity in some ornamentals with the means to overcome it. Hort Science 42(6):1346–1350Google Scholar
  7. Babel S, Kurniawan TA (2003) Low-cost adsorbents for heavy metals uptake from contaminated water: a review. J Hazard Mater 97:219–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baral SS, Das N, Ramulu TS, Sahoo SK, Das SN, Chaudhury GR (2009) Removal of Cr(VI) by thermally activated weed Salvinia cucullata in a fixed bed column. J Hazard Mater 161:1427–1435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bohart GS, Adams EQ (1920) Some aspects of the behavior of charcoal with respect to chlorine. J Am Chem Soc 42(3):523–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Calero M, Hernáinz F, Blázquez G, Tenorio G, Martín-Lara MA (2009) Study of Cr (III) biosorption in a fixed-bed column. J Hazard Mater 171:886–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheung CW, Porter JF, McKay G (2001) Sorption kinetic analysis for the removal of cadmium ions from effluents using bone char. Water Res 35(3):605–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chu KH (2010) Fixed bed sorption: setting the record straight on the Bohart-Adams and Thomas models. J Hazard Mater 177:1006–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark RB (1982) Nutrient solution growth of sorghum and corn in mineral nutrition studies. J Plant Nutr 5(8):1039–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, Eaton AD (1999) Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water, 20th ed. APHA, Washington, 1325 pGoogle Scholar
  15. Cooney DO (1998) Adsorption design for wastewater treatment. CRC press, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  16. Curl EA, Truelove B (1986) The Rhizosphere. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, New York-Tokyo, p 288 ISBN 3–540–15803-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Demiral H, Gündüzoğlu G (2010) Removal of nitrate from aqueous solutions by activated carbon prepared from sugar beet bagasse. Bioresour Technol 101(6):1675–1680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Freundlich H, Hatfield HS (1926) Colloid and Capillary Chemistry. Methuen And Co. Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Goel J, Kadirvelu K, Rajagopal C, Garg VK (2005) Removal of lead (II) by adsorption using treated granular activated carbon: batch and column studies. J Hazard Mater 125:211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hameed BH, El-Khaiary MI (2008) Kinetics and equilibrium studies of malachite green adsorption on rice straw-derived char. J Hazard Mater 153:701–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ho YS, McKay G (1998) Sorption of dye from aqueous solution by peat. Chem Eng J 70(2):115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hosseinzadeh S, Bonarrigo G, Verheust Y, Roccaro P, Van Hulle S (2017a) Water reuse in closed hydroponic systems: comparison of GAC adsorption, ion exchange and ozonation processes to treat recycled nutrient solution. Aquac Eng 78:190–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hosseinzadeh S, Verheust Y, Bonarrigo G, Van Hulle S (2017b) Closed hydroponic systems: operational parameters, root exudates occurrence and related water treatment. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 16(1):59–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huett DO (1994) Growth, nutrient uptake and Tipburn severity of hydroponic lettuce in response to electrical conductivity and K:Ca ratio in solution. Aust J Agric Res 45:251–267Google Scholar
  25. Hutchins RA (1973) New method simplifies design of activated carbon systems. Chem Eng 80:133–138Google Scholar
  26. Ji L, Liu F, Xu Z, Zheng S, Zhu D (2010) Adsorption of pharmaceutical antibiotics on template-synthesized ordered micro-and mesoporous carbons. Environ Sci Technol 44(8):3116–3122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones DL, Nguyen C, Finlay RD (2009) Carbon flow in the rhizosphere: carbon trading at the soil–root interface. Plant Soil 321:5–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jung DH, Kim HJ, Choi GL, Ahn TI, Son JE, Sudduth KA (2015) Automated lettuce nutrient solution management using an array of ion-selective electrodes. Trans ASABE 58(5):1309–1319Google Scholar
  29. Kabsch-Korbutowicz M, Bilyk A, Molczan M (2006) The effect of feed water pretreatment on ultrafiltration membrane performance. Pol J Environ Stud 15(5):719–725Google Scholar
  30. Kitazawa H, Asao T, Ban T, Pramanik M, Hosoki T (2005) Autotoxicity of root exudates from strawberry in hydroponic culture. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 80(6):677–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kumar PA, Chakraborty S (2009) Fixed-bed column study for hexavalent chromium removal and recovery by short-chain polyaniline synthesized on jute fiber. J Hazard Mater 162:1086–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Langmuir I (1918) The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J Am Chem Soc 40(9):1361–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee JG, Lee BY, Lee HJ (2006) Accumulation of phytotoxic organic acids in reused nutrient solution during hydroponic cultivation of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Sci Hortic 110(2):119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Libbrecht W, Vandaele K, De Buysser K, Verberckmoes A, Thybaut JW, Poelman H, Van Der Voort P (2015) Tuning the pore geometry of ordered mesoporous carbons for enhanced adsorption of bisphenol-a. Materials 8(4):1652–1665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Libbrecht W, Verberckmoes A, Thybaut JW, Van Der Voort P, De Clercq J (2017) Tunable large pore mesoporous carbons for the enhanced adsorption of humic acid. Langmuir 33(27):6769–6777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Martins AC, Pezoti O, Cazetta AL, Bedin KC, Yamazaki DA, Bandoch GF, Asefa T, Visentainer JV, Almeida VC (2015) Removal of tetracycline by NaOH-activated carbon produced from macadamia nut shells: kinetic and equilibrium studies. Chem Eng J 260:291–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mimmo T, Hann S, Jaitz L, Cesco S, Gessa CE, Puschenreiter M (2011) Time and substrate dependent exudation of carboxylates by Lupinus albus L. and Brassica napus L. Plant Physiol Biochem 49(11):1272–1278Google Scholar
  38. Morgan L (1998) The pH factor in hydroponics. Coconut fiber. Growing Edge 9(4):25–33Google Scholar
  39. Odhiambo GO (2017) Water scarcity in the Arabian peninsula and socio-economic implications. Appl Water Sci 7(5):2479–2492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oloibiri V, Ufomba I, Chys M, Audenaert WT, Demeestere K, Van Hulle SW (2015) A comparative study on the efficiency of ozonation and coagulation–flocculation as pretreatment to activated carbon adsorption of biologically stabilized landfill leachate. Waste Manag 43:335–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ozacar MS, Sengil IA (2003) Adsorption of reactive dyes on calcined alunite from aqueous solutions. J Hazard Mater B98(1-3):211–224.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00358-8
  42. Quintelas C, Pereira R, Kaplan E, Tavares T (2013) Removal of Ni (II) from aqueous solutions by an Arthrobacter viscosus biofilm supported on zeolite: from laboratory to pilot scale. Bioresour Technol 142:368–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Resh HM (2012) Hydroponic food production: a definitive guidebook for the advanced home gardener and the commercial hydroponic grower, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  44. Rius-Ruiz FX, Andrade FJ, Riu J, Rius FX (2014) Computer-operated analytical platform for the determination of nutrients in hydroponic systems. Food Chem 147:92–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rockström J, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Hoff H, Rost S, Gerten D (2009) Future water availability for global food production: the potential of green water for increasing resilience to global change. Water Resour Res 45(7):W00A12.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006767
  46. Savvas D, Manos G (1999) Automated composition control of nutrient solution in closed soilless culture systems. J Agric Eng Res 73(1):29–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thomas HC (1944) Heterogeneous ion exchange in a flowing system. J Am Chem Soc 66(10):1664–1666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Van Os EA (2001) New developments in recirculation systems and disinfection methods for greenhouse crops. Part II. Hort Eng 16(3):4–8Google Scholar
  49. Wang G, Dou B, Zhang Z, Wang J, Liu H, Hao Z (2015) Adsorption of benzene, cyclohexane and hexane on ordered mesoporous carbon. J Environ Sci 30:65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weber WJ, Morris JC (1964) Equilibria and capacities for adsorption on carbon. J Sanit Eng Div 90(3):79–108Google Scholar
  51. Yoon YH, Nelson JH (1984) Application of gas adsorption kinetics I. A theoretical model for respirator cartridge service life. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 45(8):509–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yu JQ, Matsui Y (1993) Extraction and identification of phytotoxic substances accumulated in nutrient solution for the hydroponic culture of tomato. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 39:691–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhuang X, Wan Y, Feng C, Shen Y, Zhao D (2009) Highly efficient adsorption of bulky dye molecules in wastewater on ordered mesoporous carbons. Chem Mater 21(4):706–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zulfadhly Z, Mashitah MD, Bhatia S (2001) Heavy metals removal in fixed-bed column by the macro fungus Pycnoporus sanguineus. Environ Pollut 112(3):463–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seyedahmad Hosseinzadeh
    • 1
  • Ze Liu
    • 1
  • Jasmien De Graeve
    • 1
  • Mona BKheet
    • 1
  • Wannes Libbrecht
    • 2
  • Jeriffa De Clercq
    • 2
  • Stijn Van Hulle
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.LIWET, Department of Industrial Biological SciencesGhent UniversityKortrijkBelgium
  2. 2.Industrial Catalysis and Adsorption Technology (INCAT), Department of Materials, Textiles and Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and ArchitectureGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations