Unit Energy Consumption as Benchmark to Select Energy Positive Retrofitting Strategies for Finnish Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTPs): a Case Study of Mikkeli WWTP
- 84 Downloads
Retrofitting municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) to energy positive is a major challenge faced by many water utilities. Selection of innovative technologies to achieve retrofitting goals is critical for capital improvement programs in WWTPs. This paper aims to provide a statistical analysis method of unit energy consumption in conventional Finnish WWTPs, presenting Mikkeli WWTP as a case study. The average energy consumption at Finnish WWTPs was quantified as a mean of 0.49 kWh/m3 with a standard deviation of 0.197. The statistical analysis showed that the total energy consumption in Finnish WWTPs are positively correlated with inflow rate and sludge production. However, the unit energy consumption decreases with increasing plant capacity. The energy benchmarking of Mikkeli WWTP confirmed the energy gap of 0.11 kWh/kg COD in electricity. The major energy saving potentials are attributed to secondary treatment, screening and grit removal, and influent pump stations. A plausible innovative retrofitting strategy comprising four emerging energy-neutral or positive technologies is proposed to maximally harness the chemical energy content in wastewater: enhanced primary sedimentation, staged anaerobic fludized membrane bioreactor (SAF-MBR) with completely autotrophic nitrogen removal over nitrite process (CANON), and co-digestion of sludge with organic food-waste. The net energy balance of emerging technologies showed a maximum energy saving potential of 1.26 kWh/kg COD, which could be sufficient to overcome the energy gap of Mikkeli WWTP, providing net positive energy surplus of 1.15 kWh/kg COD.
KeywordsMunicipal WWTPs Energy consumptions Energy benchmarking Innovative energy positive retrofitting strategies
Authors would like to thank B. Anne, R. Risto, T. Esko, and P. Paula for providing the necessary database of energy consumptions in Mikkeli WWTP.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests in relation to this work.
- Bodík I, Kubaská M (2013) Energy and sustainability of operation of a wastewater treatment plant. Environ Prot Eng 39(2):15–24Google Scholar
- Crawford G, Sandino J (2010) Energy Efficiency in Wastewater Treatment in North America: A Compendium of Best Practices and Case Studies of Novel Approaches. IWA Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Daw J, Hallett K, DeWolfe J, Venner I (2012) Energy efficiency strategies for municipal wastewater treatment facilities. Technical Report NREL/TP-7A30-53341. Office of Energy, U.S. Department of Energy. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, GoldenGoogle Scholar
- European Union (EU) (2017) Standard method and online tool for assessing and improving the energy efficiency of wastewater treatment plants. Community Research and Development Information Service (CORDIS), 7–9Google Scholar
- Goldstein R, Smith W (2002) Water & sustainability: U.S. electricity consumption for water supply & treatment - the next half century. Water Supply, 4(Volume 4), 93Google Scholar
- Gurung K, Ncibi MC, Fontmorin J, Särkkä H, Sillanpää M (2016) Incorporating submerged MBR in conventional activated sludge process for municipal wastewater treatment : a feasibility and performance assessment. J Membr Sci Technol 6(3). https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9589.1000158
- Haimi H, Mulas M, Sahlstedt K, Vahala R (2009) Advanced operation and control methods of municipal wastewater treatment processes in Finland, Helsinki University of Technology, Water and Wastewater Engineering, Helsinki, pp. 45–48Google Scholar
- Katuri KP, Werner CM, Jimenez-Sandoval RJ, Chen W, Jeon S, Logan BE, Lai Z, Amy GL, Saikaly PE (2014) A novel anaerobic electrochemical membrane bioreactor (AnEMBR) with conductive hollow-fiber membrane for treatment of low-organic strength solutions. Environ Sci Technol 48(21):12833–12841. https://doi.org/10.1021/es504392n CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lauwers J, Appels L, Taes S, Van Impe J, Dewil R (2012) Anaerobic co-digestion of fats, oils and grease (FOG) with waste activated-sludge, PRES 2012: 15th International Conference on Process Integration, Modelling and Optimisation for Energy Saving and Pollution Reduction, Italian Association of Chemical Engineering - AIDIC, Prague, Czech Republic, Aug 25-29, Vol. 29, pp. 709 - 714, Chemical Engineering Transactions, https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/359467
- Meerburg FA, Boon N, Winckel TV, Vercamer JAR, Nopens I, Vlaeminck SE (2015) Toward energy-neutral wastewater treatment: a high-rate contact stabilization process to maximally recover sewage organics. Bioresour Technol 179:373–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.12.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Metcalf and Eddy (2003) Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse. McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
- Shen Y, Linville JL, Urgun-Demirtas M, Mintz MM, Snyder SW (2015) An overview of biogas production and utilization at full-scale wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in the United States: challenges and opportunities towards energy-neutral WWTPs. Renew Sust Energ Rev 50:346–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tang WZ, Sillanpää M (2018) Sustainable Environmental Engineering. WILEY, New York, pp 50130–50130Google Scholar
- Tarallo S, Shaw A, Kohl P, Eschborn R (2015) A guide to net-zero energy solutions for water resource recovery facilities- energy solutions for water. Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF). Alexandria,VAGoogle Scholar
- US EPA, NSF, US DOE (2015) Energy-positive water resource recovery workshop report. Workshop Date: April 28–29, 2015, Arlington, VAGoogle Scholar
- USEPA (2010) Evaluation of energy conservation measures for wastewater treatment facilities. EPA-832-R-10-005. September 2010. US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. https://nepis.epa.gov. Accessed 3 February 2018
- Wisconsin (2016). Energy best practices guide : water & wastewater industry. Focus on Energy. https://focusonenergy.com. Accessed 7 Feb 2018