Advertisement

Environmental Processes

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 283–302 | Cite as

A Critical Evaluation of Advanced Oxidation Processes for Emerging Contaminants Removal

  • Sara Ann Fast
  • Veera Gnaneswar GudeEmail author
  • Dennis D. Truax
  • James Martin
  • Benjamin S. Magbanua
Technical Note

Abstract

Removing emerging contaminants from waste streams has become a topic of growing interest. The adverse effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) have been well documented, but much remains to be known about these contaminants and their removal. Their removal with traditional methods has not been entirely successful. However, adequate degradation can be achieved through the use of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs). Multiple factors must be considered when completing an in-depth comparison; therefore, process engineering, environmental, and economic and social parameters were included in a deeper analysis. This study presents a ranking system to numerically score the performance of various AOPs (e.g., Ozonation, UV irradiation, Photocatalysis, Fenton reaction, and integrated processes) in several categories of parameters under engineering, environmental, and socioeconomic components. From this preliminary assessment, it was noted that H2O2/O3 (Perozonation) presented the highest average ranking (3.45), with other processes showing comparable performance. TiO2 photocatalysis received the lowest ranking (2.11).

Keywords

Endocrine disrupting chemicals Pharmaceutical and personal care products Advanced oxidation processes Cost analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE), the Bagley College of Engineering (BCoE), and the Office of Research and Economic Development (ORED) at Mississippi State University.

References

  1. Agüera A, Bueno MJM, Fernández-Alba AR (2013) New trends in the analytical determination of emerging contaminants and their transformation products in environmental waters. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20(6):3496–3515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Kdasi A, Idris A, Saed K, Guan CT (2004) Treatment of textile wastewater by advanced oxidation processes—a review. Global Nest: the Int J 6(3):222–230Google Scholar
  3. Andreozzi R, Caprio V, Insola A, Marotta R (1999) Advanced oxidation processes (AOP) for water purification and recovery. Catal Today 53(1):51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azbar N, Yonar T, Kestioglu K (2004) Comparison of various advanced oxidation processes and chemical treatment methods for COD and color removal from a polyester and acetate fiber dyeing effluent. Chemosphere 55(1):35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baquero F, Martínez JL, Cantón R (2008) Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in water environments. Curr Opin Biotechnol 19(3):260–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belgiorno V, Rizzo L, Fatta D, Della Rocca C, Lofrano G, Nikolaou A, Meric S (2007) Review on endocrine disrupting-emerging compounds in urban wastewater: occurrence and removal by photocatalysis and ultrasonic irradiation for wastewater reuse. Desalination 215(1):166–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benotti MJ, Trenholm RA, Vanderford BJ, Holady JC, Stanford BD, Snyder SA (2008) Pharmaceuticals and endocrine disrupting compounds in US drinking water. Environ Sci Technol 43(3):597–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonton A, Bouchard C, Barbeau B, Jedrzejak S (2012) Comparative life cycle assessment of water treatment plants. Desalination 284:42–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chong MN, Sharma AK, Burn S, Saint CP (2012) Feasibility study on the application of advanced oxidation technologies for decentralised wastewater treatment. J Clean Prod 35:230–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Comninellis C, Kapalka A, Malato S, Parsons SA, Poulios I, Mantzavinos D (2008) Advanced oxidation processes for water treatment: advances and trends for R&D. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 83(6):769–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis ML (2010) Water and wastewater engineering: design principles and practice. McGraw-Hill Education, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. del Mar Gómez-Ramos M, Pérez-Parada A, García-Reyes JF, Fernández-Alba AR, Agüera A (2011) Use of an accurate-mass database for the systematic identification of transformation products of organic contaminants in wastewater effluents. J Chromatogr A 1218(44):8002–8012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dodson RE, Nishioka M, Standley LJ, Perovich LJ, Brody JG, Rudel RA (2012) Endocrine disruptors and asthma-associated chemicals in consumer products. Environ Health Perspect 120(7):935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Esplugas S, Gimenez J, Contreras S, Pascual E, Rodríguez M (2002) Comparison of different advanced oxidation processes for phenol degradation. Water Res 36(4):1034–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Esplugas S, Bila DM, Krause LGT, Dezotti M (2007) Ozonation and advanced oxidation technologies to remove endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in water effluents. J Hazard Mater 149(3):631–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fick J, Lindberg RH, Tysklind M, Haemig PD, Waldenström J, Wallensten A, Olsen B (2007) Antiviral oseltamivir is not removed or degraded in normal sewage water treatment: implications for development of resistance by influenza A virus. PLoS One 2(10):986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gómez MJ, Sirtori C, Mezcua M, Fernández-Alba AR, Agüera A (2008) Photodegradation study of three dipyrone metabolites in various water systems: Identification and toxicity of their photodegradation products. Water Res 42(10):2698–2706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guo C, Ge M, Liu L, Gao G, Feng Y, Wang Y (2009) Directed synthesis of mesoporous TiO2 microspheres: catalysts and their photocatalysis for bisphenol A degradation. Environ Sci Technol 44(1):419–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haroune L, Salaun M, Ménard A, Legault CY, Bellenger JP (2014) Photocatalytic degradation of carbamazepine and three derivatives using TiO2 and ZnO: effect of pH, ionic strength, and natural organic matter. Sci Total Environ 475:16–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huber MM, Canonica S, Park GY, Von Gunten U (2003) Oxidation of pharmaceuticals during ozonation and advanced oxidation processes. Environ Sci Technol 37(5):1016–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. James CP, Germain E, Judd S (2014) Micropollutant removal by advanced oxidation of microfiltered secondary effluent for water reuse. Sep Purif Technol 127:77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim I, Tanaka H (2011) Energy consumption for PPCPs removal by O3 and O3/UV. Ozone Sci Eng 33(2):150–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Klausen MM, Grønborg O (2010) Pilot scale testing of advanced oxidation processes for degradation of geosmin and MIB in recirculated aquaculture. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 10(2):217–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Klavarioti M, Mantzavinos D, Kassinos D (2009) Removal of residual pharmaceuticals from aqueous systems by advanced oxidation processes. Environ Int 35(2):402–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Köhler C, Venditti S, Igos E, Klepiszewski K, Benetto E, Cornelissen A (2012) Elimination of pharmaceutical residues in biologically pre-treated hospital wastewater using advanced UV irradiation technology: a comparative assessment. J Hazard Mater 239:70–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Linden KG, Sharpless CM, Andrews S, Atasi K, Korategere V, Stefan M, Suffet IM (2005) Innovative UV technologies to oxidize organic and organoleptic chemicals. Water Environment Research FoundationGoogle Scholar
  27. Lloyd RV, Hanna PM, Mason RP (1997) The origin of the hydroxyl radical oxygen in the Fenton reaction. Free Radic Biol Med 22(5):885–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mahamuni NN, Adewuyi YG (2010) Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) involving ultrasound for waste water treatment: a review with emphasis on cost estimation. Ultrason Sonochem 17(6):990–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mehrjouei M, Müller S, Möller D (2014) Energy consumption of three different advanced oxidation methods for water treatment: a cost-effectiveness study. J Clean Prod 65:178–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Metcalf & Eddy, (2014) Wastewater engineering: treatment and resource recovery, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill Education, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Mir NA, Khan A, Muneer M, Vijayalakhsmi S (2013) Photocatalytic degradation of a widely used insecticide Thiamethoxam in aqueous suspension of TiO2: adsorption, kinetics, product analysis and toxicity assessment. Sci Total Environ 458:388–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Miranda-García N, Maldonado MI, Coronado JM, Malato S (2010) Degradation study of 15 emerging contaminants at low concentration by immobilized TiO2 in a pilot plant. Catal Today 151(1):107–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. National Water Research Institute (NWRI) (2000) Treatment technologies for removal of methyl tertiary butyl ethyl (MTBE) from drinking water: air stripping, advanced oxidation processes, granular activated carbon, synthetic resin sorbets, 2nd edn. California MTBE Research Partnership, Fountain ValleyGoogle Scholar
  34. O’Shea KE, Dionysiou DD (2012) Advanced oxidation processes for water treatment. J Phys Chem Lett 3(15):2112–2113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Oller I, Malato S, Sánchez-Pérez J (2011) Combination of advanced oxidation processes and biological treatments for wastewater decontamination—a review. Sci Total Environ 409(20):4141–4166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Poyatos JM, Muñio MM, Almecija MC, Torres JC, Hontoria E, Osorio F (2010) Advanced oxidation processes for wastewater treatment: state of the art. Water Air Soil Pollut 205(1-4):187–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rahman MF, Yanful EK, Jasim SY (2009) Occurrences of endocrine disrupting compounds and pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment and their removal from drinking water: Challenges in the context of the developing world. Desalination 248(1):578–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reynolds TD, Richards PA (1996) Unit operations and processes in environmental engineering, 2nd edn. Cengage Learning, StamfordGoogle Scholar
  39. Scientific Applications International Corporation (SAIC), Curran MA (2006) Life-cycle assessment: principles and practice. National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection AgencyGoogle Scholar
  40. Shemer H, Kunukcu YK, Linden KG (2006) Degradation of the pharmaceutical metronidazole via UV, Fenton and photo-Fenton processes. Chemosphere 63(2):269–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sichel C, Garcia C, Andre K (2011) Feasibility studies: UV/chlorine advanced oxidation treatment for the removal of emerging contaminants. Water Res 45(19):6371–6380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Snyder SA, Westerhoff P, Yoon Y, Sedlak DL (2003) Pharmaceuticals, personal care products, and endocrine disruptors in water: implications for the water industry. Environ Eng Sci 20(5):449–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stasinakis AS (2008) Use of selected advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) for wastewater treatment—a mini review. Global NEST J 10(3):376–385Google Scholar
  44. Westerhoff P, Yoon Y, Snyder S, Wert E (2005) Fate of endocrine-disruptor, pharmaceutical, and personal care product chemicals during simulated drinking water treatment processes. Environ Sci Technol 39(17):6649–6663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. World Health Organization (2003) Iron in drinking water. Retrieved March 12, 2015 from http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/chemicals/iron.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sara Ann Fast
    • 1
  • Veera Gnaneswar Gude
    • 1
    Email author
  • Dennis D. Truax
    • 1
  • James Martin
    • 1
  • Benjamin S. Magbanua
    • 1
  1. 1.Civil and Environmental Engineering DepartmentMississippi State UniversityMississippi StateUSA

Personalised recommendations