Advertisement

Exploring students’ learning and gaming performance as well as attention through a drill-based gaming experience for environmental education

  • Yi-Chun Lin
  • Ya-Hui Hsieh
  • Huei-Tse HouEmail author
  • Shu-Ming Wang
Article
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

This study aims to empirically and qualitatively explore elementary-school students’ learning and gaming performance as well as attention in response to resource classification tasks in a drill-based educational game and to further explore patterns in their gaming performance and attention. A mixed-methods design was employed, and performance analysis, video analysis, quantitative content analysis, and cluster analysis were used to analyze the data. Results showed that these students achieved statistically significant learning gains on resource classification through the gaming experience and exhibited different qualities in their gaming achievement. In addition, the attention aspects in Keller’s ARCS model can be further classified into sub-categories and can enrich the qualitative features of the attention aspects from the drill-based educational game perspective. The group of students who performed most poorly and divided their attention across diverse gaming components should receive more guidance and assistance in developing strategies for staying focused. This study also proposes suggestions for future researchers, instructors, and game designers interested in game-based learning.

Keywords

Environmental education Interactive learning environments Media in education Attention Learning and gaming performance 

Notes

References

  1. Alessi, S. M., & Trollip, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for learning: Methods and development. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  2. Boyle, E. A., Connolly, T. M., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). Engagement in digital entertainment games: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 771–780.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, S. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.Google Scholar
  4. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. E. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. Christensen, C. A., & Gerber, M. M. (1990). Effectiveness of computerized drill and practice games in teaching basic math facts. Exceptionality, 1(3), 149–165.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed-methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. De Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., & Boumans, R. M. J. (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41, 393–408.Google Scholar
  10. Di Serio, A., Ibáñez, M. B., & Kloos, C. D. (2012). Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.002.Google Scholar
  11. Environmental Protection Department. (2012). Garbage Classification and Resource Recycling. Retrieved July 23, 2012 from http://envir.epb.tpc.gov.tw/recycle1/page1-2.asp.
  12. Eow, Y. L., Ali, W., Wan, Z., Mahmud, R., & Baki, R. (2009). Form one students’ engagement with computer games and its effect on their academic achievement in a Malaysian secondary school. Computers & Education, 53, 1082–1091.Google Scholar
  13. Fukuyama, K. (2000). Effectiveness of Social Systems Sustained by Residents’Participation: A Collection System of Classified Resource and Rubbish. In Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (pp. 506–511), Tennessee, United States.  https://doi.org/10.1109/icsmc.2000.885043.
  14. Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), 441–467.Google Scholar
  15. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  16. Grimley, M., Green, R., Nilsen, T., & Thompson, D. (2012). Comparing computer game and traditional lecture using ratings from high and low achieving students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 619–638.Google Scholar
  17. Hoffman, B., & Nadelson, L. (2010). Motivational engagement and video gaming: A mixed methods study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(3), 245–270.Google Scholar
  18. Hopper, J. R., & Nielsen, J. M. (1991). Recycling as altruistic behavior: Normative and behavioral strategies to expand participation in a community recycling program. Environment and Behavior, 23(2), 195–220.Google Scholar
  19. Hou, H. T. (2010). Exploring the behavioural patterns in project-based learning with online discussion: Quantitative content analysis and progressive sequential analysis. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 52–60.Google Scholar
  20. Hou, H. T. (2012). Exploring the behavioral patterns of learners in an educational massively multiple online role-playing game (MMORPG). Computers & Education, 58(4), 1225–1233.Google Scholar
  21. Hou, H. T. (2015). Integrating cluster and sequential analysis to explore learners’ flow and behavioral patterns in a simulation game with situated-learning context for science courses: A video-based process exploration. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 424–435.Google Scholar
  22. Hou, H. T., Chang, K. E., & Sung, Y. T. (2010). Applying lag sequential analysis to detect visual behavioral patterns of online learning activities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 25–27.Google Scholar
  23. Huizenga, J., Admiraal, W., Akkerman, S., & ten Dam, G. (2009). Mobile game-based learning in secondary education: Engagement, motivation and learning in a mobile city game. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(4), 332–344.Google Scholar
  24. Ke, F. (2008). A case study of computer gaming for math: Engaged learning from gameplay? Computers & Education, 51, 1609–1620.Google Scholar
  25. Kebritchi, M., Hirumi, A., & Bai, H. Y. (2010). The effects of modern mathematics computer games on mathematics achievement and class motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 427–443.Google Scholar
  26. Keller, J. M. (1984). The use of the ARCS model of motivation in teacher training. In K. S. A. J. Trott (Ed.), Aspects of educational technology volume XVII: Staff development and career updating. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  27. Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model. New York, NY: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  28. Kiili, K. (2007). Foundation for problem-based gaming. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 394–404.Google Scholar
  29. Kim, S., & Chang, M. D. (2010). Computer Games for the Math Achievement of Diverse Students. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 224–232.Google Scholar
  30. Krcmar, M., Farrar, K., & McGloin, R. (2011). The effects of video game realism on attention, retention and aggressive outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 432–439.Google Scholar
  31. Lin, C.-H., & Liu, E. Z.-F. (2009). A comparison between drill-based and game-based typing software. In Z. Pan, A. D. Cheok, W. Müller, & M. Chang (Eds.), Transactions on edutainment III (pp. 48–58). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Lin, Y. C., Hsieh, Y. H., Hou, H. T., Yen Y. S., Chou, Y. S., & Chen, H. (2011). Designing a web-based drill game to improve learners resources classification abilities: A case study. In Paper presented at the 19th International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE2011), November 28 to December 2, 2011 Chiang Mai, Thailand.Google Scholar
  33. Luik, P. (2007). Characteristics of drills related to development of skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 56–68.Google Scholar
  34. Özdener, N., & Çelen, B. (2009). The effect of forming a score-based competitive system in cyber-drilling atmosphere for learning and motivation. International Journal of Human Sciences, 6(2), 222–238.Google Scholar
  35. Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4.Google Scholar
  36. Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32, 1–8.Google Scholar
  37. Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2004). Validity in quantitative content analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(1), 5–18.Google Scholar
  38. Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  39. Tennyson, R. D., & Jorczak, R. L. (2008). A conceptual framework for the empirical study of instructional games. In H. F. O’Neil & R. S. Perez (Eds.), Proceedings of the Computer Games and Team and Individual Learning (pp. 3–20). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  40. Trefry, G. (2010). Casual game design: Designing play for the gamer in all of us. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.Google Scholar
  41. Tsai, M. J., Hou, H. T., Lai, M. L., Liu, W. Y., & Yang, F. Y. (2012). Visual attention for solving multiple-choice science problem: An eye-tracking analysis. Computers & Education, 58, 375–385.Google Scholar
  42. Tuzun, H., Yilmaz-Soylu, M., Karakus, T., Inal, Y., & Kizilkaya, G. (2009). The effects of computer games on primary school students’ achievement and motivation in geography learning. Computers & Education, 52(1), 68–77.Google Scholar
  43. Van Eck, R. (2006). Digital game-based learning: It’s not just the digital natives who are restless. EDUCASE Review, 41(2), 16–30.Google Scholar
  44. Van Weenen, H. (2000). Towards a vision of a sustainable university. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 1(1), 20–34.Google Scholar
  45. Yueh, M.-C. M., Cowie, B., Barker, M., & Jones, A. (2010). What influences the emergence of a new subject in schools? The case of environmental education. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 5(3), 265–285.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Beijing Normal University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yi-Chun Lin
    • 1
  • Ya-Hui Hsieh
    • 1
  • Huei-Tse Hou
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shu-Ming Wang
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate Institute of Applied Science and Technology, National Taiwan University of Science and TechnologyTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Information Management, School of Continuing EducationChinese Culture UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations