Attention please! Enhanced attention control abilities compensate for instructional impairments in multimedia learning
Learners exposed to multimedia learning contexts have to deal with a variety of visual stimuli, demanding a conducive design of learning material to maintain limitations in attentional resources. Within the current study, effects and constraints arising from two selected impairing features are investigated in more detail within a computer-based learning task on factor analysis. A sample of 53 students received a combination of textual and pictorial elements that explained the topic, while impaired attention was systematically induced in a 2 × 2 factorial between-subjects design by interrupting system-notifications (with vs. without) and seductive text passages (with vs. without). Learners’ ability for controlled attention was assessed with a standardized psychological attention inventory. Approaching the results, learners receiving seductive text passages spent significantly more time on the learning material. In addition, a moderation effect of attention control abilities on the relationship between interruptions and retention performance resulted. Explanations for the obtained findings are discussed referring to mechanisms of compensation, load, and activation.
KeywordsMultimedia learning Controlled attention Interruptions Seductive details Learning performance
- American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles and code of conduct for psychologists. Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Backhaus, K., Erichson, B., Plinke, W., & Weiber, R. (2006). Multivariate Analysemethoden. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung [Multivariate methods of analysis. An application-oriented introduction] (11th ed.). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Bortz, J. (2005). Statistik für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler [Statistics for behavioral and social scientists] (6th ed.). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Conway, A. R. A., & Kane, M. J. (2001). Capacity, control and conflict: An individual differences perspective on attentional capture. In C. L. Folk & B. S. Gibson (Eds.), Attraction, distraction and action. Multiple perspectives on attentional capture. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
- Irtel, H. (2007). PXLab: The Psychological Experiments Laboratory (Version 2.1.19) [Computer software]. Mannheim, Germany: University of Mannheim, Retrieved February 10th, 2016 from http://www.pxlab.de.
- Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Killgore, W. D. S. (2010). Effects of sleep deprivation on cognition. In G. A. Kerkhof & H. P. A. Van Dongen (Eds.), Progress in brain research (Vol. 185). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
- Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2014). Bayesian cognitive modeling: A practical course. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Mayer, R. E. (Ed.). (2014). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Moosbrugger, H., & Oehlschlägel, J. (2011). Frankfurter Aufmerksamkeits-Inventar 2 (FAIR-2) [Frankfurt Attention Inventory (2nd ed.). Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
- Rey, G. D. (2011). Seductive details in multimedia messages. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 20, 283–314.Google Scholar
- Wickens, C. D., Hollands, J. G., Banbury, S., & Parasuraman, R. (2013). Engineering psychology and human performance (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar