Navigating the Waters of Social Justice: Strategies from Veteran School Psychologists
- 89 Downloads
- 1 Citations
Abstract
Six school psychologist practitioners who self-identified as social justice change agents were interviewed for this study. Interview questions were informed by two central themes that were important to the understanding of school psychologists as change agents: defining social justice and potential application to school psychology practice. The interviews were coded via consensual qualitative research. Thirteen different themes emerged. Some of the most noteworthy findings related to being a social justice agent include taking personal responsibility to bring about change, using political savvy to navigate power structures, modeling the changes one is seeking to bring about, and working in a culturally responsive manner across differing perspectives.
Keywords
Social justice School psychology Advocacy Cultural responsivenessNotes
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
References
- Augustyniak, K. M., Kilanowski, L., & Privatera, G. J. (2016). Perception of leadership practices of school psychologists: views of multiple stakeholders. School Psychology Forum: Research Into Practice, 10, 371–385.Google Scholar
- Barrett, C., & A’Vant, E. R. (2017). The social justice task force. Communiqué, 46(2), 21.Google Scholar
- Blake, J. J., Gregory, A., James, M., & Hasan, G. W. (2016). Early warning signs: identifying opportunities to disrupt racial inequities in school discipline through data-based decision making. School Psychology Forum: Research In Practice, 10, 289–306.Google Scholar
- Briggs, A., McArdle, L., Bartucci, G., Kowalewicz, E., & Shriberg, D. (2009). Students’ perspectives on the incorporation of social justice in a school psychology graduate program. Trainers’ Forum, 28(4), 35–45.Google Scholar
- Castillo, J. M., & Curtis, M. J. (2014). Best practices in systems-level change. In P. L. Harrison & A. Thomas (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology: systems-level services (pp. 11–28). Bethesda: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
- Durham, J. I. (2012). Promoting social justice by addressing barriers to academic success. In D. Shriberg, S. Y. Song, A. H. Miranda, & K. M. Radliff (Eds.), School psychology and social justice: conceptual foundations and tools for practice (pp. 189–205). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Grapin, S. L. (2017). Social justice training in school psychology: applying principles of organizational consultation to facilitate change in graduate programs. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 27, 173–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2016.1217489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Graybill, E., Baker, C. N., Cloth, A. H., Fisher, S., & Nastasi, B. K. (2017). An analysis of social justice research in school psychology. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2017.1302850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. The Counseling Psychologist, 25, 517. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000097254001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jenkins, K., Conway, D., Reucker, D., Shriberg, D., & Jones, H. (2017). Bringing social justice principles to practice: new practitioners speak. Contemporary School Psychology, 21(32), 1–4.Google Scholar
- Jones, J. M. (2012). Family, school, and community partnerships. In D. Shriberg, S. Y. Song, A. H. Miranda, & K. M. Radliff (Eds.), School psychology and social justice: Conceptual foundations and tools for practice (pp. 270–293). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- McCabe, P., & Rubinson, F. (2008). Committing to social justice: the behavioral intention of school psychology and education trainees to advocate for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered youth. School Psychology Review, 37, 469–486.Google Scholar
- Miranda, A., Radliff, K. M., Cooper, J. M., & Eschenbrenner, C. R. (2014). Graduate student perceptions of the impact of training for social justice: development of a training model. Psychology in the Schools, 51, 348–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moy, G. E., Briggs, A., Shriberg, D., Furrey, K. J., Smith, P., & Tompkins, N. (2014). Developing school psychologists as agents of social justice: a qualitative analysis of student understanding across three years. Journal of School Psychology, 52, 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2014.03.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nastasi, B. K., & Varjas, K. (2012). School psychology and social justice in the global community. In D. Shriberg, S. Y. Song, A. H. Miranda, & K. M. Radliff (Eds.), School psychology and social justice: conceptual foundations and tools for practice (pp. 29–52). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Proctor, S. L. (2016). Introduction to the special issue: encouraging racial and social justice through the pre-K to graduate school pipeline. School psychology forum: research in practice, 10, 233–236.Google Scholar
- Sander, J. B. (2012). Consultation and collaboration. In D. Shriberg, S. Y. Song, A. H. Miranda, & K. M. Radliff (Eds.), School psychology and social justice: conceptual foundations and tools for practice (pp. 225–243). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Schultze, J., Winter, L. A., Woods, K., & Tyldesley, K. (2017). Investigating the significance of social justice in educational psychology practice—a systemic literature review. Educational & Child Psychology, 34(3), 57–73.Google Scholar
- Shriberg, D. (Ed.) (2009). Teaching for social justice in school psychology graduate programs: strategies and lessons learned [Special issue]. Trainer’s Forum, 28(3).Google Scholar
- Shriberg, D., & Clinton, A. (2016). The application of social justice principles to school psychology practice. School Psychology International, 37, 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034316646421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shriberg, D., & Fenning, P. (2009). School consultants as agents of social justice: implications for practice: introduction to the special topic issue. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 19, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474410802462751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shriberg, D., Bonner, M., Sarr, B. J., Walker, A. M., Hyland, M., & Chester, C. (2008). Social justice through a school psychology lens: definitions and applications. School Psychology Review, 37, 453–468.Google Scholar
- Shriberg, D., Wynne, M. E., Bartucci, G., Briggs, A., & Lombardo, A. (2011). School psychologists’ perspectives on social justice. School Psychology Forum: Research in Practice, 5(2), 37–53.Google Scholar
- Shriberg, D., Song, S. Y., Miranda, A. H., & Radliff, K. M. (2012). School psychology and social justice: conceptual foundations and tools for practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Singh, A. A., Urbano, A., Haston, M., & McMahon, E. (2010). School counselors’ strategies for social justice change: a grounded theory of what works in the real world. Professional School Counseling, 13, 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Song, S. Y., Miranda, A. H., Radliff, K. M., & Shriberg, D. (2018). School psychology in a global society: Roles and functions. Bethesda: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
- Vera, E. M., & Speight, S. L. (2003). Multicultural competence, social justice, and counseling psychology: expanding our roles. The Counseling Psychologist, 31, 253–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000003031003001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Williams, S. A. S., & Crockett, D. P. (2012). Institutional barriers: poverty and education. In D. Shriberg, S. Y. Song, A. H. Miranda, & K. M. Radliff (Eds.), School psychology and social justice: Conceptual foundations and tools for practice (pp. 137–154). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar