Teacher-Directed Violence and Stress: the Role of School Setting
Teacher-directed violence (TDV), or violence in schools directed toward teachers, is a growing concern in contemporary schools (Bounds & Jenkins, Contemporary School Psychology, 20, 1–9, 2016; Espelage et al. 2011). Existing research suggests that some teachers are more at risk of TDV (e.g., teachers whom are White, female, homosexual, religious, older, or those teaching high school) but it is unclear if teachers from all school settings (i.e., rural, urban, or suburban) experience similar levels of TDV and stress associated with TDV. Additionally, there has been no research in the USA examining how teachers cope with teacher-directed violence. Little is known about to whom teachers reach out for social support and if that social support is effective in moderating teacher stress. Past research demonstrates that teaching is a high-stress occupation (Fimian, Exceptional Children, 52, 436–442, Fimian 1988), and some of this stress could be related to experiences of violence. The current study examined differences in TDV experiences among 117 rural, urban, and suburban teachers in the Midwest. Analyses revealed that teachers in urban schools experienced the highest levels of TDV, followed by teachers in rural schools, then suburban teachers. A similar result was found when teachers were asked about stress they experienced that was specific to violence at work. Interestingly, when assessing work stress, suburban teachers had the highest levels of work stress, followed by urban, then rural teachers.
KeywordsTeacher victimization Teacher-directed violence Teacher stress
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Brunetti, G. J. (2001). Why do they teach? A study of job satisfaction among long-term high school teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 28, 49–67.Google Scholar
- Espelage, D., Anderman, E. M., Brown, V. E., Jones, A., Lane, K. L., McMahon, S. D., et al. (2011). Understanding and preventing violence directed against teachers: recommendations for a national research, practice, and policy agenda. The American Psychologist, 68, 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fimian, M. (1988). Teacher Stress Inventory [Measurement instrument]. Retrieved from: http://www.instructionaltech.net/TSI/.
- Goldstein, S. E., Young, A., & Boyd, C. (2008). Relational aggression at school: associations with school safety and social climate. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 641–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-007-9192-4.
- Horng, E. (2005). Poor working conditions make urban schools hard-to-staff. University of California All Campus Consortium on Research for Diversity. UC Berkeley: University of California All Campus Consortium on Research for Diversity. Retrieved from: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/0269b641.
- Johnson, J., & Strange, M. (2007). Why Rural Matters 2007: the realities of rural education growth. Rural School and Community Trust. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED498859.pdf.
- Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: a descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 37–62. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737024001037.
- Leadbeater, B. J., Sukhawathanakul, P., Smith, A., Yeung Thompson, R. S., Gladstone, E. J., & Sklar, N. (2013). Bullying and victimization in rural schools: risks, reasons, and responses. Journal of Rural and Community Development, 8, 31–47.Google Scholar
- Martinez, A., McMahon, S. D., Espelage, D., Anderman, E. M., Reddy, L. A., & Sanchez, B. (2016). Teachers’ experiences with multiple victimization: Identifying demographic, cognitive, and contextual correlates. Journal of School Violence, 15, 387–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2015.1056879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mooij, T. (2011). Secondary school teachers' personal and school characteristics, experience of violence and perceived violence motives. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 17, 227–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2011.539803
- Patterson, G. R. (1976). The aggressive child: Victim and architect of a coercive system. In E. Mash, L. A. Hamerlynch, & L. C. Handy (Eds.), Behavior modification and families. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
- Reddy, L. A., Espelage, D., McMahon, S. D., Anderman, E. M., Lane, K. L., Brown, V. E., et al. (2013). Violence against teachers: case studies from the APA task force. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 1, 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2013.837019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sauter, S., Murphy, L., Colligan, M., Swanson, N., Hurrell, J., Scharf, F. S., et al. (1999). Stress at work (DHHS publication no. 99–101). Cincinnati: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.Google Scholar
- Stanford, B. H. (2001). Reflections of resilient, persevering urban teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 28, 75–85.Google Scholar
- Travers, C. J., & Cooper, C. L. (1996). Teachers under pressure: stress in the teaching profession. London: Routledge, Psychology Press.Google Scholar