Effectiveness and Social Validity of the Soles of the Feet Mindfulness-Based Intervention with Special Education Students
- 408 Downloads
Soles of the Feet for Students (SOF) has demonstrated effectiveness at increasing academic engagement among general education students. This work intended to replicate and extend previous work by exploring the effectiveness and social validity of SOF among students receiving special education services, who had low levels of academic engagement and high levels of disruptive classroom behavior, in a public school setting. This study utilized a multiple baseline single-subject design. Four students (grades 4–7) were taught SOF over the course of five 20–30-min sessions. Direct observation data of student academically engaged behavior were collected during baseline and post intervention study phases. Students and teachers also completed social validity questionnaires. Following SOF training, all four students demonstrated improved mean levels of academically engaged behavior. Students and teachers also reported that SOF was an acceptable, feasible, and effective intervention. SOF offers a brief and effective manualized intervention to increase student academic engagement, and conversely reduce classroom disruptive behavior, for students receiving special education services.
KeywordsMindfulness Students Schools Youth Academic engagement Off-task behavior Special education Education context
Special thanks to the following for their participation in this research project (listed alphabetically): Jacob Groff, Brian Martens, Christabelle Moore, Maxwell Morris, Kara Tom, and Wayne Wilson. At the time this research study was conducted, all authors were affiliated with the University of Oregon.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Mental Health Grant.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Broidy, L. M., Nagin, D. S., Tremblay, R. E., Bates, J. E., Brame, B., Dodge, K. A., et al. (2003). Developmental trajectories of childhood disruptive behaviors and adolescent delinquency: a six-site, cross-national study. Developmental Psychology, 39, 222–245.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Felver, J.C. & Singh, N. N. (in preparation). Soles of the Feet for Students: a brief mindfulness-based intervention for disruptive behavior in the classroom. Treatment manual.Google Scholar
- Felver, J. C., Tipsord, J. M., Morris, M. J., Racer, K. H., & Dishion, T. J. (in press). The effects of mindfulness-based intervention on children’s attention regulation. Journal of Attention Disorders. doi: 10.1177/1087054714548032.
- Gettinger, M., & Miller, K. (2014). Best practices in increasing academic engaged time. In P. L. Harrison & A. Thomas (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology: Student-level services (pp. 19–35). Bethesda: NASP Publications.Google Scholar
- Greenwood, C. R., Horton, B. T., & Utley, C. A. (2002). Academic engagement: current perspectives on research and practice. School Psychology Review, 31, 328–349.Google Scholar
- Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from What Works Clearinghouse website: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf.
- Levendoski, L. S., & Cartledge, G. (2000). Self-monitoring for elementary school children with emotional disturbances: classroom application for increased academic responding. Behavioral Disorders, 25, 211–224.Google Scholar
- March, R. E., Horner, R. H., Lewis-Palmer, T., Brown, D., Crone, D. A., Todd, A. W., et al. (2000). Functional assessment checklist for teachers and staff (FACTS). Eugene: University of Oregon.Google Scholar
- Oregon Department of Education. (2011). School/district archived reports. Retrieved from http://www.ode.state.or.us.
- Schaeffer, C. M., Petras, H., Ialongo, N., Poduska, J., & Kellam, S. (2003). Modeling growth in boys' aggressive behavior across elementary school: links to later criminal involvement, conduct disorder, and antisocial personality disorder. Developmental Psychology, 39, 1020.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Singh, N. N., Wahler, R. G., Adkins, A. D., Myers, R. E., & The Mindfulness Research Group. (2003a). Soles of the feet: a mindfulness-based self-control intervention for aggression by an individual with mild mental retardation and mental illness. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 24, 158–169.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Witt, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom intervention strategies. Advances in school psychology, 4, 251–288.Google Scholar